ADAMS, W. C. T. (1919). Superintendent's rating of teachers . J. Educ.90, 288-298 .
2.
ALLPORT, G. W. (1960). The open system in personality theory . J. abnorm. soc. psych., 61, 301-311 .
3.
ANDERS-RICHARDS, D. (1969). Teaching-practice: assessment procedures . Education for teaching, 80, 71-72 .
4.
ANDREWS, J. H. M. & BROWN, A. F. (1959). Can principals exclude their own personality characteristics when they rate their teachers?Educational admin. and supervision, 45, 234-242 .
5.
ARGYLE, M. & KENDON, A. (1967). The experimental analysis of social performance, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, 3. New York: Academic Press .
6.
ARGYLE, M. (1969). Social interaction. London: Methuen .
7.
BACH, J. O. (1952). Practice teaching success in relation to other measures of teaching ability . J. Exper. Educ., 30, 57-80 .
8.
BALES, R. F. (1953). A theoretical framework for interaction process analysis, in Cartwright, D. & Zander, A. (eds). Group Dynamics: research and theory. New York: Harper & Row .
9.
BARR, A. S. (1940). The measurement and prediction of teaching efficiency . Rev. educ. res., 10, 182-184 ; 13, 218-223 .
10.
BARR, A. S. & JONES, R. E. (1958). The measurement and prediction of teaching efficiency . Rev. educ. res., 28, 256-264 .
11.
BERNSTEIN, B. (1967). Open schools, open society . New Society, 10 (259), September 17.
12.
BILLS, R. E. (1952). An investigation of student centred teaching . J. educ. res., 46, 316-317
13.
BILLS, R. E. (1956). Personality changes during student centred teaching . J. educ. res., 50, 121-126 .
14.
BLUMBERG, A. & WEBER, W. A. (1968). Teacher morale as a function of perceived supervisor behaviour styles . J. educ. res., 62, No. 3.
15.
BOVARD, E. W. Jr. (1951). The psychology of classroom interaction . J. educ. res., 45, 215-234 .
16.
BOWERS, H. (1948). The pretraining selection of students . School (Comb.Ed.) 36, 490-491 , 560-562 .
17.
BOYCE, A. C. (1915). Methods of measuring teachers' efficiency . Nat. yearbook soc. stud. educ., 14, Part II.
18.
BROWN, B. B. , MENDENHALL, W. , & BEAVER, R. (1968). The reliability of observations of teachers' classroom behaviour . J. exper. educ., 36, No. 3.
19.
BUCKLEY, W. (ed.) (1968). Modern systems research for the behavioural scientist. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
20.
BUSWELL, M. M. (1953). The relationship between the social structure of the classroom and the academic success of the pupils . J. exper. educ., 22, 37-52 .
21.
CENTRAL SCHOOL BOARDS COMMITTEE FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH . (1951). Identifying superior teacher. New York: Inst. of Adm. Res.
22.
CHICHESTER, J. B. (1956). Who is the good teacher?Phi Delta Kappa, 37, 245-247 .
23.
CLARK, Jean M. (1967). The supervision of teaching practice . Education for Teaching, 74, 44-50 .
24.
COFFMAN, W. E. (1954). Determining students' concepts of effective teaching from their ratings of instructors . J. educ. psych., 45, 227-286 .
25.
DAVIS, Hazel (1964). Evolution of current practices in evaluating teacher competence, in Biddle, Bruce J. & Ellena, William J. (eds). Contemporary Research on Teacher Effectiveness, pp. 4146-4146. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
26.
DAY, R. C. & HAMBLIN, R. L. (1964). Some effects of close and punitive styles of supervision. Amer. j. soc.
27.
DI VESTA, F. J. (1954). Instructor-centered and student-centered approaches in teaching a human relations course . J. appl. psych., 38, 329-335 .
28.
ELLENA, W. J. , STEVENSON, M. , & WEBB, H. V. (eds). (1961). Who's a good teacher?Illinois, Evanston: American Association of School Administrators, Department of Classroom Teachers of the National Educational Association, and National School Boards Association .
29.
FLETCHER, C. (1958). Supervision and assessment of teaching practice . Educationfor Teaching, 47, 17-23 .
30.
GOLDHAMMER, R. (1969). Clinical supervision. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
31.
FLOUD, J. & HALSEY, A. H. (1959). Education and social structure: theories and methods . Harvard educ. rev.29, 288-296 .
32.
GOWAN, J. C. (1955). Prediction of teaching success: prediction by rating authority . Calif. j. educ. res., 6, 147-152 .
33.
GOUGH, H. G. & PEMBERTON, W. H. (1952). Personality characteristics related to success in practice teaching . J. appl. psych., 36, 307-311 .
34.
GRIFFITHS, A. & MOORE A. H. (1967). Schools and teaching practice . Education for Teaching, 74, 33-39 .
35.
HALL, E. (1970). School placement and teaching marks . Education for Teaching, 82, 55-57 .
36.
HARVEY, D. (1969). Explanation in geography. London: Arnold .
37.
HOPPER, E. (1967). Some efects of supervisory style: a sociological analysis. Br. j. soc.
38.
JOHNSON, G. B. (1955). An evaluating instrument for the analysis of teacher effectiveness . J. exper. educ., 23, 331-344 .
39.
KRUMBOLTZ, J. D. & FARQUHAR, W. W. (1957). The effect of three teaching methods on achievement and motivational outcomes in a how-to-study course . Psych. mono., 1, No. 14. (Whole No. 443).
40.
LANZ, D. L. (1967). The relationship of university supervisors and supervising teachers' ratings to observed student teachers' behaviour . Am. educ. res. J., 4, No. 3, 279-288 .
41.
LIPPITT, R. & WHYTE, R. K. (1947). An experimental study of leadership and group life, in Newcomb, T. M. & Hartley, E. L. , Readings in social psychology, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
42.
McKEACHIE, W. J. (1954). Student-centered vs. instructor-centered instruction . J. educ. psych., 45, 143-150 .
43.
MERIAM, L. L. (1906). Normal school education and efficiency in teaching. Teach. coll. contr. educ., No. I.
44.
MITZEL, H. E. (1957). A behavioural approach to the assessment of teacher effectiveness. New York: Office of Research and Evaluation .
45.
MORRISON, A. & McINTYRE, D. (1969). Teachers and teaching. London: Penguin Books .
46.
POPPLETON, Pamela K. (1969). The assessment of teaching practice . Higher educ. j., 17, No. 3, 15-19 .
47.
RABINOWITZ, W. & TRAVERS, R M. W. (1953). Problems of defining and assessing teacher effectivenss . Educational Theory, 3, 212-219 .
48.
REAVIS, W. C. & COOPER, D. H. (1945). The evaluation of teacher merit in city school systems. Supplementary educ. mono. No. 59. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago .
49.
ROBERTSON, J. D. C. (1957). An analysis of the views of supervisors on the attributes of successful student teachers . Br. j. educ. psych., 27, 115-126 .
50.
SHIPMAN, M. D. (1966). The assessment of teaching practice. Education for Teaching, No. 70, 28-31.
51.
STERN, G. C. (1967). Measuring noncognitive variables in research on teaching, in Gage, N. L. (ed.) Handbook of research on teaching, Chicago: Rand McNally & Co. , 398-447.
52.
SYMONDS, P. M. (1955). Characteristics of the effective teacher based on pupil evaluations . J. exper. educ., 23, 289-310 .
53.
THIBAUT, J. W. & KELLEY, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley .
54.
TIEGS, E. W. (1928). An evaluation of some techniques of teacher selection. Bloomington, Ill.: Public Schools Publishing Company .
55.
TUDHOPE, W. J. (1942). A study of the training college final teaching mark as a criterion of future success in the teaching profession . Br. j. educ. psych., 12, 167-171 , and 13, 16-23 .
56.
VANDER, W. L. S. (1956). The evaluation of teaching . Am. school bd. j., 133, 27-30 .
57.
WHITNEY, F. L. (1924). The prediction of teaching success. Bloomington Ill.: Public Schools Publishing Company .
58.
YUILL, B. (1968). Supervision -principles and techniques. London: George Allen & Unwin , International Business Management Series: 2.