BACHMAN, J. G. , BOWER, D. G. , & MARCUS, P. M. (1965). Bases of supervisory power: a comparative study in five organizational settings , Amer. Psychologist20, 537-537 .
2.
BACHMAN, J. G. , SMITH, C. G. , & SLESINGER, J. A. (1966). Control performance and satisfaction: an analysis of structural and individual effects . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.4, 127-136 .
3.
BLALOC K, H. M., Jr. , (1964). Causal inference in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press .
4.
CAPLOW, T. & McGEE, R. (1948). The academic marketplace. New York: Basic Books .
5.
CARTWRIGHT, D. & ZANDER, A. (1960). Group dynamics: research and theory. Chapter 19. Evanston, III: Row, Peterson .
6.
DEMERATH, N. J. , STEPHENS, R. W. , & TAYLOR, R. R. (1967). Power, presidents, and professors. New York: Basic Books .
7.
ETZIONI, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall .
8.
FRENCH, J. R. P., JR. , & RAVEN, B. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Groups dynamics: research and theory. Evanston, III.: Row, Peterson , pp. 607-623.
9.
GEORGOPOULOS, B. S. (1965). Normative structure variables and organizational behavior: a comparative study . Hum. Relat.18, 155-169 .
10.
GOSS, MARY E. W. (1963). Patterns of bureaucracy among hospital staff physicians. In E. Freidson (Ed.), The hospital in modern society. New York: Free Press , pp. 170-194.
11.
JACKSON, J. M. (1960). Structural characteristics of norms. In G. E. Jensen , (Ed.). Dynamics of instructional groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , pp. 136-163.
12.
KAHN, R. L. , WOLFE, D. M. , QUINN, R. P. , SNOCK, J. D. & ROSENTHAL, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley .
13.
MARCH, J. G. , & SIMON H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley .
14.
NEWCOMB, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
15.
PARSONS, T. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations . Administrative Sci. Quart.1. 63-85, 225-239 .
16.
PELZ, D. G. & ANDREWS, F. M. (1964). Detecting causal priorities in panel study data . Amer. sociol. Rev.29, 836-848 .
17.
RAVEN, B. H. , & RI ETSMA, J. (1957). The effects of varied clarity of group goal and group path upon the individual and his relation to his group . Hum. Relat.1029-45 .
18.
SCHACHTER, S. , ELLERTSON, N. , McBRIDE, D. , & GREGORY, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity . Hum. Relat.4, 229-238 .
19.
SIMON, H. A. (1964). On the concept of organizational goal . Administrative Sci. Quart.9, 1-22 .
20.
TANNENBAUM, A. S. (1961). Control and effectiveness in a voluntary organization . Amer. J. Sociol.67, 33-46 .
21.
TANNENBAUM, A. S. (1962). Control in organizations: individual adjustment and organizational performance . Administrative Sci. Quart.7, 236-257 .
22.
TANNENBAUM, A. S. & BACHMAN, J. G. (1966). Attitude uniformity and role in a voluntary organization . Hum. Relat.19, 309-322 .
23.
THIBAUT, J. W. , & KELLEY, H. A. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley .
24.
WARRINER, C. K. (1965). The problem of organizational purpose . Sociological Quarterly 6, 139-146 .
25.
WIELAND, G. F. (1966). Organizational goals and their clarity in liberal arts colleges. Manuscript.
