ALLPORT, F. H. (1954). The structuring of events: an outline of a general theory with applications to psychology . Psychol. Rev.61, 281-303 .
2.
ALLPORT, F. H. (1955). Theories of perception and the concept of structure. New York: Wiley .
3.
ALLPORT, F. H. (1962). A structuronomic conception of behaviour: I. Structural theory and the master problem of social psychology . J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.64, 3-30 .
4.
ANDERSON, R. C. (1959). Learning in discussion: a resume of the Authoritarian Democratic studies . Harv. Educ. Rev.29, 201-212 .
5.
ANDERSON, LYNN R. & FIEDLER, F. E. (1964). The effect of participatory and supervisory leadership on group creativity . J. appl. Psychol.48, 227-236 .
6.
CARTER, L. , HAYTHORN, W. , SHRIVER, B. & LANZETTA, J. (1950). The behaviour of leaders and other group members . J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.46, 589-595 .
7.
CARTWRIGHT, D. & ZANDER, A. (1953). Group dynamics. London: Tavistock .
8.
CATTELL, R. B. , SAUNDERS, D. R. & STICE, G. F. (1953). The dimensions of syntality in small groups . Hum. Relat.6, 331-336 .
9.
FIEDLER, F. E. (1963). A contingency model for the production of leadership effectiveness. Technical Report No. 10. Urbana: University of Illinois .
10.
FIEDLER, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. I. New York: Academic Press .
11.
FLAMENT, C. (1963). Applications of graph theory to group structure. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall .
12.
GEORGE, C. E. (1962). Research memorandum. Some determinants of small group effectiveness. Hum RRO research memo., Subtask Unifect , No. 26.
13.
GLANZER, M. & GLASER, R. (1959). Techniques for the study of group structure and behaviour. I. Analysis of structure . Psychol. Bull.56, 317-332 .
14.
GLANZER, M. & GLASER, R. (1961). Techniques for the study of group structure and behaviour. II. Empirical studies of the effects of structure in small groups . Psychol. Bull.58, 1-27 .
15.
HARARY, F. , NORMAN, R. Z. & CARTWRIGHT, D. (1965). Structural models: an introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York: Wiley .
16.
HESLIN, R. (1965). Predicting group task effectiveness from member characteristics . Psychol. Bull.62, 248-256 .
17.
KATZELL, R. A. (1962). Contrasting systems of work organization . Amer. Psychol.17, 102-108 .
18.
KELLY, H. K. & THIBAUT, J. W. (1954). Experimental studies of group problemsolving and process. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of socialpsychology, Vol. II. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley .
19.
KLUCKHOHN, C. & MURRAY, H. H. (Eds.). (1948). Personality in nature, society, and culture. New York: Knopf; London: Jonathan Cape , 1949.
20.
LEAVITT, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance . J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.46, 38-50 .
21.
LEWIN, K. , Lippirr, R. & WHm, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created 'social climates' . J. soc. Psychol.10, 271-299 .
22.
LEWIN, K. (1952). Field theory in social science. London: Tavistock .
23.
MORENO, F. B. (1946). Combining role and sociometric testing: a methodological approach . Sociometry9, 155-161 .
24.
MORRISSETTE, J. O. , PEARSON, W. H. & SWITZER, S. A. (1965). A mathematically defined task for the study of group performance . Hum. Relat.18, 187-192 .
25.
NADEL, S. F. (1957). The theory of social structure. London: Cohen & West; Melbourne: Melbourne University Press .
26.
O'BRIEN, G. E. (1964). The use of graph theory in social psychology. Unpublished paper delivered to the British Psychological Society, Australian Branch, Annual Conference, Armidale, N.S.W.
27.
OESER, O. A. & HARARY, F. (1962). A mathematical model for structural role theory, I . Hum. Relat.15, 89-109 .
28.
OESER, O. A. & HARARY, F. (1964). A mathematical model for structural role theory, II . Hum. Relat.17, 3-17 .
29.
PARSONS, T. & SHILS, E. A. (Eds.) (1951). Towards a general theory of action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press .
30.
ROBY, T. B. & LANZETTA, J. T. (1958). Considerations in the analysis of group tasks . Psychol. Bull.55, 88-101 .
31.
SHAW, M. E. (1954a). Some effects of unequal distribution of information upon group performance in various communication nets . J. abnorm. soc. Psychol.49, 547-553 .
32.
SHAW, M. E. (1954b). Some effects of problem complexity upon problem solution efficiency in different communication nets . J. exp. Psychol.48, 211-217 .
33.
SHAW, M. E. (1963). Scaling group tasks. A method for dimensional analysis. Technical Report No. 1. University of Florida .
34.
SHAW, M. E. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. I. New York: Academic Press . Pp. 111-149.
35.
THURSTONE, L. L. & CHAVE, E. J. (1929). The measurement of attitudes. Chicago: Chicago University Press .
36.
WEBER, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. Translated by E. A. Shils & A. French . Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press .
37.
WEBER, M. (1958). From Max Weber. Translated by H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills . New York: Oxford Univeristy Press .
38.
ZILLER, R. C. (1963). Leader assumed dissimilarity as a measure of prejudicial cognitive style . J. appl. Psychol.47, 339-342 .