1. CHARTERS, W. W., Jr., and NEWCOMB, T. M."Some attitudinal effects of experimentally increased salience of a membership group." In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, and E. L. Hartley. (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (Rev. Ed.) New York: Holt, 1952. 415-420. 288-288.
2.
2. CHEIN, I., DEUTSCH, M., HYMAN, H., andJAHODA, MARIE (Eds.). "Con-sistency and inconsistency in intergroup relations."J. soc. Issues, 1949, 5, No. 3.
3.
3. HARTLEY, E. L., and HARTLEY, RUTH E.Fundamentals of social psychologyNew York: Knopf, 1952.
4.
4. KELLEY, H. H., and VOLKART, E. H."The resistance to change of group-anchored attitudes."Amer. sociol. Rev., 1952, 17, 453-465.
5.
5. KRIESBERG, M."Cross-pressures and attitudes."Publ. Opin. Quart., 1949, 13, 5-16.
6.
6. KULP, D. H., "II. Prestige, as measured by single-experience changes and their permanency."J. educ. Res., 1934, 27, 663-672.
7.
7. LAZARSFELD, P. F., BERELSON, B., and GAUDET, HAZEL. The people's choice (2nd Ed.) New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1948.
8.
8. LEWIN, K."Psycho-sociological problems of a minority group."Character and Pers., 1935, 3, 175-187.
9.
9. LEWIN, K."The conceptual representation and the measurement of psy-chological forces."Contr. to Psychol. Theory, 1938, 1, No. 4.
