How do individuals who engage in high-risk work deal with the existential threats that are part and parcel of their daily activities? Based on a qualitative study of fighter pilots, we find that experiences and responses to existential threats are shaped by three intersubjective processes, that is, socially constructed and accepted patterns of interactions by which individuals come to view existential threats as one of several challenges of their work, something that is common yet unremarkable. These processes draw from and impinge upon cherished social identities to inculcate in individuals: (1) a preoccupation with performance as a precondition for continued membership, thereby crowding out death anxiety; (2) a willingness to withstand no-holds barred collective scrutiny, thereby keeping their egos under check, and enhancing learning and safety; and (3) a view of death as a commonplace and therefore unremarkable facet of their activities. The contribution of our study is to illuminate the intersubjective processes implicated in the development of social identities that enable individuals in high-risk work to function effectively despite the existential threats they face.
AgerPBursztynLLeuchtL, et al. (2022) Killer incentives: Rivalry, performance and risk-taking among German fighter pilots, 1939–45. The Review of Economic Studies89(5): 2257–2292.
2.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2007) Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1265–1281.
3.
AlvessonMWillmottH (2002) Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies39(5): 619–644.
4.
AshforthBEMaelF (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
5.
AshforthBESchinoffBS (2016) Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior3: 111–137.
6.
AshforthBEHarrisonSHCorleyKG (2008) Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management34(3): 325–374.
7.
BacharachSBBambergerPA (2007) 9/11 and New York City firefighters’ post hoc unit support and control climates: A context theory of the consequences of involvement in traumatic work-related events. Academy of Management Journal50(4): 849–868.
8.
BacharachSBBambergerPADovehE (2008) Firefighters, critical incidents, and drinking to cope: The adequacy of unit-level performance resources as a source of vulnerability and protection. Journal of Applied Psychology93(1): 155.
9.
BeckerE (1997) The Denial of Death. New York: Free Press.
10.
BellE (1999) The negotiation of the working role in organisational ethnography. International Journal of Research Methodology2(1): 17–37.
11.
BhangaokarRKapadiaS (2009) At the interface of ‘Dharma’ and ‘Karma’: Interpreting moral discourse in India. Psychological Studies54: 96–108.
12.
BrownAD (ed.) (2020) Identities in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BurkePJ (1991) Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review56(6): 836–849.
14.
CandrianC (2014) Taming death and the consequences of discourse. Human Relations67(1): 53–69.
15.
CollinsonDL (1999) Surviving the rigs: Safety and surveillance on North Sea oil installations. Organization Studies20(4): 579–600.
16.
ConroySHenleCAShoreL, et al. (2017) Where there is light, there is dark: A review of the detrimental outcomes of high organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior38(2): 184–203.
17.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CoxCRDarrellAArrowoodRB (2019) The method behind the science: A guide to conducting terror management theory research. In: RoutledgeCVessM (eds) Handbook of Terror Management Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 85–132.
19.
CunliffeACouplandC (2012) From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations65(1): 63–88.
20.
DickP (2005) Dirty work designations: How police officers account for their use of coercive force. Human Relations58(11): 1363–1390.
21.
DunnAMScottCAllenJA, et al. (2016) Quantity and quality: Increasing safety norms through after action reviews. Human Relations69(5): 1209–1232.
22.
ElyRJMeyersonDE (2010) An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Research in Organizational Behavior30: 3–34.
23.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
24.
GallagherSMcGillowayS (2008) Living in critical times: The impact of critical incidents on frontline ambulance personnel: A qualitative perspective. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience9(3): 215–224.
25.
GrantAMWade-BenzoniKA (2009) The hot and cool of death awareness at work: Mortality cues, aging, and self-protective and prosocial motivations. Academy of Management Review34(4): 600–622.
26.
HällgrenMRouleauLDe RondM (2018) A matter of life or death: How extreme context research matters for management and organization studies. Academy of Management Annals12(1): 111–153.
27.
HardyCMaguireSPowerM, et al. (2020) Organizing risk: Organization and management theory for the risk society. Academy of Management Annals14(2): 1032–1066.
28.
Harmon-JonesESimonLGreenbergJ, et al. (1997) Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduced mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72(1): 24.
29.
HaslamSAJettenJMaskorM, et al. (2022) Developing high-reliability organisations: A social identity model. Safety Science153: 105814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105814
30.
HayesJSchimelJFaucherEH, et al. (2008) Evidence for the DTA hypothesis II: Threatening self-esteem increases death-thought accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(3): 600–613.
31.
HornseyMJ (2008) Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(1): 204–222.
32.
JacobsenABeehrTA (2020) Mortality salience in the workplace. In: RossiAMMeursJAPerrewePL (eds) Stress and Quality of Working Life: Finding Meaning in Grief and Suffering. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 61–80.
33.
JohnsG (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review31(2): 386–408.
34.
JonasEFischerP (2006) Terror management and religion: Evidence that intrinsic Religiousness mitigates worldview defense following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91(3): 553–567.
35.
JonasESchimelJGreenbergJ, et al. (2002) The Scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(10): 1342–1353.
36.
JuhlJ (2019) Terror management theory: A theory of psychological well-being. In: RoutledgeCVessM (eds) Handbook of Terror Management Theory. London: Academic Press, 303–324.
37.
KesslerIHeronPDopsonS (2012) Opening the window: Managing death in the workplace. Human Relations65(3): 291–312.
38.
La PorteLConsoliniP (1991) Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of high reliability organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory1(1): 19–47.
LucasK (2015) Workplace dignity: Communicating inherent earned and remediated dignity. Journal of Management Studies52(5): 621–646.
41.
McCrackenG (1988) The Long Interview, vol. 13. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
MaitlisSSonensheinS (2010) Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies47(3): 551–580.
43.
MartelaF (2015) Fallible inquiry with ethical ends-in-view: A pragmatist philosophy of science for organizational research. Organization Studies36(4): 537–563.
44.
MuldoonOHaslamSAHaslamC, et al. (2019) The social psychology of responses to trauma: Social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses. European Journal of Social Psychology30(1): 311–348.
45.
NagRCorleyKGGioiaDA (2007) The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal50(4): 821–847.
46.
O’NeillOARothbardNP (2017) Is love all you need? The effects of emotional culture, suppression, and work–family conflict on firefighter risk-taking and health. Academy of Management Journal60(1): 78–108.
47.
PrattMG (2000) The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly45(3): 456–493.
48.
PyszczynskiTSolomonSGreenbergJ (2003) In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49.
ReedyPLearmonthM (2011) Death and organization: Heidegger’s thought on death and life in organizations. Organization Studies32(1): 117–131.
50.
ReidEMO’NeillOABlair-LoyM (2018) Masculinity in male-dominated occupations: How teams, time, and tasks shape masculinity contests. Journal of Social Issues74(3): 579–606.
51.
RobertsKHBeaR (2001) Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives15(3): 70–78.
52.
RouleauLHällgrenMde RondM (2021) Covid-19 and our understanding of risk, emergencies, and crises. Journal of Management Studies58(1): 245–248.
53.
SætreASVan de VenA (2021) Generating theory by abduction. Academy of Management Review46(4): 684–701.
54.
SliterMKaleAYuanZ (2014a) Is humor the best medicine? The buffering effect of coping humor on traumatic stressors in firefighters. Journal of Organizational Behavior35(2): 257–272.
55.
SliterMTSinclairRRYuanZ, et al. (2014b) Don’t fear the reaper: Trait death anxiety, mortality salience, and occupational health. Journal of Applied Psychology99(4): 759–769.
56.
SmithW (2006) Organizing death: Remembrance and re-collection. Organization13(2): 225–244.
57.
SteinJHCropanzanoR (2011) Death awareness and organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior32(8): 1189–1193.
58.
TajfelHE (1978) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
59.
TearMJReaderTW (2023) Understanding safety culture and safety citizenship through the lens of social identity theory. Safety Science158: 105993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105993
60.
ThornborrowTBrownAD (2009) ‘Being regimented’: Aspiration, discipline and identity work in the British parachute regiment. Organization Studies30(4): 355–376.
61.
Van DickRCiampaVLiangS (2018) Shared identity in organizational stress and change. Current Opinion in Psychology23: 20–25.
62.
WeickKE (1990) The vulnerable system: An analysis of the Tenerife air disaster. Journal of Management16(3): 571–593.
63.
WeickKE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly38(4): 628–652.
64.
WeickKE (1996) Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly41(2): 301–313.
65.
WeickKE (2010) Reflections on enacted sensemaking in the Bhopal disaster. Journal of Management Studies47(3): 537–550.
66.
WeickKERobertsKH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 357–381.
67.
WeickKESutcliffeKM (2006) Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science17(4): 514–524.
68.
WeickKESutcliffeKM (2015) Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
69.
WeickKESutcliffeKMObstfeldD (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science16(4): 409–421.
70.
WeickKESutcliffeKMObstfeldD (2008) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Crisis Management3(1): 31–66.
71.
WicksD (2002) Institutional bases of identity construction and reproduction: The case of underground coal mining. Gender, Work & Organization9(3): 308–335.
72.
WolfeT (1979) The Right Stuff (Vintage Classics, Kindle Edition). London: Jonathan Cape Limited.
73.
YuanZBaranikLESinclairRR, et al. (2019) Memento Mori: The development and validation of the Death Reflection Scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior40(4): 417–433.
