Although workers’ cooperatives are regarded as credible alternatives to private companies to reform capitalism, scholars have only started to document the struggles inherent to cooperativization – the process by which private companies transition to cooperative forms. This article analyses how executives prevent actual cooperativization in practice by shaping and capturing governance structures. Relying on 35 interviews, observations, and focus groups of two private firms having adopted cooperative forms, we document a set of governance practices used by executives to prevent cooperativization: general assembly disempowerment, board neutralization, and executive committee entrenchment. We then explain how these practices interact to form a spiral of democratic governance prevention that generate spurious workers cooperatives. These results contribute to cooperative studies by explaining the role of executives and governance in preventing cooperativization. Our study enlarges the repertoire of worker cooperatives pathologies and offers political and organizational levers to limit the phenomena of cooperativization prevention and executives’ capture of governance structures.
AguinisHGabrielK (2022) If you are serious about impact, create a personal impact development plan. Business & Society61(4): 818–826.
2.
AllumFMarinaroISciarroneR (2019) Italian Mafias Today: Territory, Business and Politics. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
3.
AudebrandL (2017) Expanding the scope of paradox scholarship on social enterprise: The case for (re)introducing worker cooperatives. M@n@gement20(4): 368–393.
4.
AzkarragaJCheneyGUdaondoA (2012) Workers’ participation in a globalized market: Reflections on and from Mondragon. In: AzteniM (ed.) Alternative Work Organizations. London: Springer, 76–102.
5.
BasterretxeaICornforthCHeras-SaizarbitoriaI (2022) Corporate governance as a key aspect in the failure of worker cooperatives. Economic and Industrial Democracy43(1): 362–387.
6.
BattilanaJFuersteinMLeeM (2018) New prospects for organizational democracy? In: RanganS (ed.) Capitalism Beyond Mutuality? Perspectives Integrating Philosophy and Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 256–288.
7.
BernsteinP (1976) Workplace Democratization: Its Internal Dynamics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
8.
BirchallJ (2014) The Governance of Large Co-operative Businesses. Manchester: Co-operatives UK.
9.
BowmanBStoneB (2004) Cooperativization on the mondragon model: Alternative to globalizing capitalism. Humanity & Society28(3): 272–297.
10.
BretosIErrastiA (2017) Challenges and opportunities for the regeneration of multinational worker cooperatives: Lessons from the Mondragon Corporation – a case study of the Fagor Ederlan Group. Organization24(2): 154–173.
11.
BretosIErrastiA (2018) The challenges of managing across borders in worker cooperatives: Insights from the Mondragon cooperative group. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management6(1): 34–42.
12.
BretosIErrastiAMarcuelloC (2018) Ownership, governance, and the diffusion of HRM practices in multinational worker cooperatives: Case-study evidence from the Mondragon group. Human Resource Management Journal28(1): 76–91.
13.
BretosIErrastiAMarcuelloC (2020). Is there life after degeneration? The organizational life cycle of cooperatives under a ‘grow or die’ dichotomy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics91(3): 435–458.
14.
Bourlier-BarguesEHollandtsXValiorgueB (2018) Mettre en œuvre une gouvernance démocratique suite à une reprise en SCOP, une lecture en terme de travail instiutionnel. Revue Française de Gestion263(43): 31–50.
15.
CabantousLGondJ.-PHardingN, et al. (2016) Critical essay: Reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations69(2): 197–213.
16.
CG Scop (2013) Guide pratique de la reprise d’entreprise par les salariés en Scop. Paris: Confédération Générale des SCOP.
17.
CG Scop (2020) Rapport d'activité 2020. Paris: Confédération Générale des SCOP.
18.
CheneyGSanta CruzIPeredoA, et al. (2014) Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization21(5): 591–603.
19.
CloutierCLangleyA (2020) What makes a process theoretical contribution?Organization Theory1(1): 2631787720902473.
20.
ContuA (2020) Answering the crisis with intellectual activism: Making a difference as business schools scholars. Human Relations73(5): 737–757.
CornforthC (1995) Patterns of cooperative management: Beyond the degeneration thesis. Economic and Industrial Democracy16(4): 487–523.
23.
CornforthC (2004) The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics75(1): 11–32.
24.
CornforthC (2012) Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly41(6): 1116–1135.
25.
CornforthCThomasASpearR, et al. (1988) Developing Successful Worker Co-operatives. London: SAGE.
DiefenbachT (2019) Why Michels’ iron law of oligarchy’ is not an iron law – and how democratic organisations can stay ‘oligarchy-free’. Organization Studies40(4): 545–562.
28.
DiefenbachT (2020) The Democratic Organisation: Democracy and the Future of Work. London: Routledge.
29.
Dombre-CosteF (2016) Favoriser la transmission d’entreprise en France: diagnostic et propositions. Paris: Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie.
30.
EbrahimABattilanaJMairJ (2014) The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior34: 81–100.
31.
EisenhardtKGraebnerM (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal50(1): 25–32.
32.
ErrastiA (2015) Mondragon’s Chinese subsidiaries: Coopitalist multinationals in practice. Economic and Industrial Democracy36(3): 479–499.
33.
ErrastiABretosIEtxezarretaE (2016) What do Mondragon coopitalist multinationals look like? The rise and fall of Fagor Electrodomesticos S. Coop. and its European subsidiaries. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics87(3): 433–456.
34.
EsperSCabantousLBarin-CruzL, et al. (2017) Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises. Organization24(5): 671–699.
35.
FerrerasIBattilanaJMédaD (2020) Le manifeste travail. Démocratiser, démarchandiser, dépolluer. Paris: Seuil.
36.
FlechaRNgaiP (2014) The challenge for Mondragon: Searching for the cooperative values in times of internationalization. Organization21(5): 666–682.
37.
FurnariSCrillyDMisangyiV, et al. (2021) Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review46(4): 778–799.
38.
GioiaDCorleyKHamiltonA (2012) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods16(1): 15–31.
39.
GondJ-PNybergD (2017) Materializing power to recover corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies38(8): 1127–1148.
40.
Heras-SaizarbitoriaI (2014) The ties that bind? Exploring the basic principles of worker-owned organizations in practice. Organization21(5): 645–665.
41.
IannuzziFSacchettoD (2022) Outsourcing and workers’ resistance practices in Venice’s hotel industry: The role of migrants employed by cooperatives. Economic and Industrial Democracy43(2): 877–897
42.
ICA (2017) Guidance Notes on the Cooperative Principles and Values. Bruxelles: International Cooperative Alliance.
43.
JaumierS (2017) Preventing chiefs from being chiefs: An ethnography of a co-operative sheet-metal factory. Organization24(2): 218–239.
44.
LangleyA (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
45.
LangleyASmallmanCTsoukasH, et al. (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 1–13.
46.
LecaBGondJ-PBarin CruzL (2014) Building ‘critical performativity engines’ for deprived communities: The construction of popular cooperative incubators in Brazil. Organization21(5): 683–712.
47.
LincolnYGubaE (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
48.
MartoneV (2017) Marketisation of social services and mafia infiltration: The case of migrant reception centres in Rome. European Review of Organised Crime4(1): 9–29.
49.
MichelsR (1915) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
50.
MichieJBlasiJBorzagaC (2017) The Oxford Handbook of Mutual, Co-operative, and Co-owned Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
MorganD (1996) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
52.
PanseraMRizziF (2020) Furbish or perish: Italian social cooperatives at a crossroads. Organization27(1): 17–35.
53.
ParanqueBWillmottH (2014) Cooperatives – saviours or gravediggers of capitalism? Critical performativity and the John Lewis Partnership. Organization21(5): 604–625.
54.
RiversoR (2019) Cooperative spurie ed appalti: nell’inferno del lavoro illegale. Questione giustizia.
55.
SpenceLdu GayP (2022) In praise of involvement. Business & Society61(4): 833–838.
56.
VietaM (2020) Workers’ Self-management in Argentina: Contesting Neo-liberalism by Occupying Companies, Creating Cooperatives, and Recuperating Autogestión. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Academic.
57.
WestphalJZajacE (2013) A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. Academy of Management Annals7(1): 607–661.
58.
YinR (2015) Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. London: Guilford Publications.
59.
ZanoniPContuAHealyS, et al. (2017) Post-capitalistic politics in the making: The imaginary and praxis of alternative economies. Organization24(5): 575–588.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
