Gig workers commonly face challenges that differ in nature or intensity from those experienced by traditional organizational workers. To better understand and support gig workers, we sought to develop a measure that reliably and validly assesses these challenges. We first define gig work and specify its core characteristics. We then provide an integrated conceptual framework for a measure of six challenges commonly faced by gig workers—viability, organizational, identity, relational, emotional, and career-path uncertainty. We then present five studies: item generation in Study 1; item reduction, exploratory assessment of the factor structure of these items, and initial tests of convergent validity in Study 2; and in the remaining three studies, we draw from different gig worker populations to accumulate evidence for the convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of our Gig Work Challenges Inventory (GWCI), and present initial tests of the universality of the gig challenges inventory across a range of socio-demographic, job type, and regional factors. Our findings establish the reliability and validity of a GWCI that can aid researchers seeking to better understand the types and impact of stressors gig workers face, which in turn can help to inform theory, practice, and public policy.
AguinisHLawalSO (2013) eLancing: A review and research agenda for bridging the science–practice gap. Human Resource Management Review23(1): 6–17.
2.
AlacovskaA (2017) The gendering power of genres: How female Scandinavian crime fiction writers experience professional authorship. Organization24(3): 377–396.
3.
AlderferCP (1972) Existence, Relatedness, and Growth: Human Needs in Organizational Settings. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4.
AllanP (2002) The contingent workforce: Challenges and new directions. American Business Review20(2): 103–110.
5.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1991) Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validates. Journal of Applied Psychology76(5): 732–740.
6.
AndersonTBidwellM (2019) Outside insiders: Understanding the role of contracting in the careers of managerial workers. Organization Science30(5): 1000–1029.
7.
AshforthBE (1989) The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes43(2): 207–242.
8.
AshfordSJCazaBBReidEM (2018) From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work. Research in Organizational Behavior38: 23–41.
9.
AshfordSJGeorgeEBlattR (2007) Old assumptions, new work: The opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. The Academy of Management Annals1(1): 65–117.
10.
BarleySR (1989) Careers, identities, and institutions: The legacy of the Chicago School of Sociology. In: ArthurMBHallDTLawrenceBS (eds) Handbook of Career Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–65.
11.
BarleySRKundaG (2004) Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BarleySRKundaG (2006) Contracting: A new form of professional practice. Academy of Management Perspectives20(1): 45–66.
13.
BarleySRBechkyBAMillikenFJ (2017) The changing nature of work: Careers, identities, and work lives in the 21st century. Academy of Management Discoveries3(2): 111–115.
14.
BauerTNTruxilloDMSanchezRJ, et al (2001) Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology54(2): 387–419.
15.
BeckerHS (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
BeehrTAWalshJTTaberTD (1976) Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology61(1): 61–67.
17.
BellesiaFMattarelliEBertolottiF, et al (2019) Platforms as entrepreneurial incubators? How online labor markets shape work identity. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 246–268.
18.
BennettDHennekamS (2018) Self-authorship and creative industries workers’ career decision-making. Human Relations71(11): 1454–1477.
19.
BergerTFreyCBLevinG, et al. (2019) Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ‘gig economy’. Economic Policy34(99): 429–477.
20.
BonannoGADiminichED (2013) Annual research review: Positive adjustment to adversity trajectories of minimal-impact resilience and emergent resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry54(4): 378–401.
21.
BrawleyAM (2017) The big, gig picture: We can’t assume the same constructs matter. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice10(4): 687–696.
22.
BrotheridgeCMLeeRT (2003) Development and validation of the Emotional Labour Scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology76(3): 365–379.
23.
ButlerNStoyanova RussellD (2018) No funny business: Precarious work and emotional labour in stand-up comedy. Human Relations71(12): 1666–1686.
CampionEDCazaBBMossSE (2020) Multiple jobholding: An integrative systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Management46(1): 165–191.
26.
CappelliPKellerJR (2013) Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review38(4): 575–596.
27.
CazaBBMossSVoughH (2018) From synchronizing to harmonizing: The process of authenticating multiple work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly63(4): 703–745.
28.
CnossenBBencherkiN (2019) The role of space in the emergence and endurance of organizing: How independent workers and material assemblages constitute organizations. Human Relations72(6): 1057–1080.
29.
ConnellyCEGallagherDG (2006) Independent and dependent contracting: Meaning and implications. Human Resource Management Review16(2): 95–106.
30.
ConnellyCEFieselerCČerneM, et al (2021) Working in the digitized economy: HRM theory & practice. Human Resource Management Review31(1): 100762.
31.
CortinaJMShengZKeenerSK, et al (2020) From alpha to omega and beyond! A look at the past, present, and (possible) future of psychometric soundness in theJournal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology105(12): 1351–1381.
32.
CostelloABOsborneJ (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation10(7): 1–9.
33.
CrossDSwartJ (2020) Professional fluidity: Reconceptualising the professional status of self-employed neo-professionals. Organization Studies. Epub ahead of print 28 September 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620964985.
34.
CullenKLGerbasiAChrobot-MasonD (2018) Thriving in central network positions: The role of political skill. Journal of Management44(2): 682–706.
35.
Davis-BlakeAUzziB (1993) Determinants of employment externalization: A study of temporary workers and independent contractors. Administrative Science Quarterly38(2) 195–223.
36.
Den HartogDNDe HooghAHKeeganAE (2007) The interactive effects of belongingness and charisma on helping and compliance. Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 1131–1139.
37.
De StefanoV (2016) The rise of the “just-in time workforce”: On demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the “gig economy”. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal37(3): 461–471.
38.
DugganJShermanUCarberyR, et al (2020) Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal30(1): 114–132.
39.
EvansJAKundaGBarleyS (2004) Beach time, bridge time, and billable hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly49(1): 1–38.
40.
FaulknerRR (1983) Music on Demand. New York: Transaction Publishers.
41.
FlemingP (2017) The human capital hoax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization. Organization Studies38(5): 691–709.
42.
FriedmanG (2014) Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics2(2): 171–188.
43.
GalaisNMoserK (2009) Organizational commitment and the well-being of temporary agency workers: A longitudinal study. Human Relations62(4): 589–620.
44.
GarrettLESpreitzerGMBacevicePA (2017) Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies38(6): 821–842.
45.
GleimMRJohnsonCMLawsonSJ (2019) Sharers and sellers: A multi-group examination of gig economy workers’ perceptions. Journal of Business Research98: 142–152.
46.
GoodsCVeenABarrattT (2019) “Is your gig any good?”: Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. Journal of Industrial Relations61(4): 502–527.
47.
GrahamMLehdonvirtaVWoodA, et al (2017) The risks and rewards of online gig work at the global margins. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
48.
GrandeyAAGabrielAS (2015) Emotional labor at a crossroads: Where do we go from here?Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior2(1): 323–349.
49.
GrömpingU (2006) Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software17(1): 1–27.
50.
GudaHSubramanianU (2019) Your Uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives. Management Science65(5): 1995–2014.
51.
HackmanJROldhamGR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology60(2): 159–170.
52.
HarrisonDAMcLaughlinME (1991) Exploring the cognitive processes underlying responses to self-report instruments: Effects of item content on work attitude measures. In: Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami, August 1991.
53.
HarveyE (1967) Social change and the jazz musician. Social Forces46(1): 34–42.
54.
HeggestadEDScheafDJBanksGC, et al (2019) Scale adaptation in organizational science research: A review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management45(6): 2596–2627.
55.
HinkinTR (1995) A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management21(5): 967–988.
56.
HinkinTR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods1(1): 104–121.
57.
HobfollSE (2011) Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology84(1): 116–122.
58.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
59.
HughesEC (1958) Men and Their Work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
60.
HughesHHockeyJBerryG (2019) Power play: The use of space to control and signify power in the workplace. Culture and Organization26(4): 298–314.
61.
HughesMEWaiteLJHawkleyLC, et al (2004) A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging26(6): 655–672.
62.
IbarraH (1999) Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly44(4): 764–791.
63.
JahodaM (1981) Work, employment, and unemployment: Values, theories, and approaches in social research. American Psychologist36(2): 184–191.
64.
JanssensMSelsLVan Den BrandeI (2003) Multiple types of psychological contracts: A six-cluster solution. Human Relations56(11): 1349–1378.
65.
JohnsonJW (2000) A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research35(1): 1–19.
66.
JudgeTALockeEADurhamCC, et al (1998) Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology83(1): 17–34.
67.
KallebergAL (2000) Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology26(1): 341–365.
68.
KallebergAL (2009) Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review74(1): 1–22.
69.
KarasekRA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24(2): 285–308.
70.
KatzLFKruegerAB (2019) The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. ILR Review72(2): 382–416.
71.
KelloggKCValentineMAChristinA (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 366–410.
72.
KellowayKE (1995) Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior16(3): 215–225.
73.
KostDFieselerCWongSI (2018) Finding meaning in a hopeless place? The construction of meaningfulness in digital microwork. Computers in Human Behavior82: 101–110.
74.
KostDFieselerCWongSI (2019) Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron?Human Resource Management Journal30(1): 100–113.
75.
KuhnKM (2016) The rise of the “gig economy” and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology9(1): 157–162.
76.
KuhnKMGallowayT (2019) Expanding perspectives on gig work and gig workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 186–191.
77.
KuhnKMMalekiA (2017) Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and Instaserfs: Understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives31(3): 183–200.
78.
KundaGBarleySREvansJ (2002) Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review55(2): 234–261.
79.
LawlorLGWilleySL (2017) Are your workers employees or independent contractors: Three exercises to help students accurately classify workers. Journal of Legal Studies Education34(2): 167–205.
80.
LanajKJohnsonRWangM (2016) When lending a hand depletes the will: The daily costs and benefits of helping. Journal of Applied Psychology101(8): 1097–1110.
81.
LaneCM (2011) A Company of One: Insecurity, Independence, and the New World of White-Collar Unemployment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
82.
LeanaCRMittalVStiehlE (2012) Organizational behavior and the working poor. Organization Science23(3): 888–906.
83.
LehdonvirtaV (2018) Flexibility in the gig economy: Managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment33(1): 13–29.
84.
LeiterMPMaslachC (2016) Latent burnout profiles: A new approach to understanding the burnout experience. Burnout Research3(4): 89–100.
85.
MaddenLKidderDEddlestonK, et al (2017) A conservation of resources study of standard and contingent employees. Personnel Review46(3): 644–661.
86.
MalinBJChandlerC (2017) Free to work anxiously: Splintering precarity among drivers for Uber and Lyft. Communication, Culture & Critique10(2): 382–400.
87.
MeijerinkJKeeganA (2019) Conceptualizing human resource management in the gig economy. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 214–232.
88.
MengerPM (2003) Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology25(1): 541–574.
89.
MuthénLKMuthénBO (1998–2017) Mplus User’s Guide (8th Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
90.
OECD (2019) Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. Paris: OECD Publishing.
91.
O’MahonySBechkyB (2006) Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Academy of Management Journal49(5): 918–941.
92.
OzcelikHBarsadeSG (2018) No employee an island: Workplace loneliness and job performance. Academy of Management Journal61(6): 2343–2366.
93.
PanteliNRaptiAScholariosD (2020) “If he just knew who we were”: Microworkers’ emerging bonds of attachment in a fragmented employment relationship. Work, Employment & Society34(3): 476–494.
94.
PetriglieriGAshfordSJWrzesniewskiA (2019) Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly64(1): 124–170.
95.
PorathCSpreitzerGGibsonC, et al (2012) Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior33(2): 250–275.
96.
PreacherKJMacCallumRC (2002) Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behavior Genetics32(2): 153–161.
97.
RanganathanA (2018) The artisan and his audience: Identification with work and price setting in a handicraft cluster in southern India. Administrative Science Quarterly63(3): 637–667.
98.
RavenelleAJ (2019) “We’re not Uber”: Control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 269–285.
99.
ReillyP (2017) The layers of a clown: Career development in cultural production industries. Academy of Management Discoveries3(2): 145–164.
100.
RizzoJRHouseRJLirtzmanSI (1970) Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly15(2): 150–163.
101.
RosenblatA (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms are Rewriting the Rules of Work. California, USA: University of California Press.
102.
RosenblatAStarkL (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication10: 3758–3784.
103.
RossoBDDekasKHWrzesniewskiA (2010) On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior30: 91–127.
104.
RowlandsLHandyJ (2012) An addictive environment: New Zealand film production workers’ subjective experiences of project-based labour. Human Relations65(5): 657–680.
105.
SaucierG (1994) Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment63(3): 506–516.
106.
SchneiderBAlderferCP (1973) Three studies of measures of need satisfaction in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly18(4): 489–505.
107.
ShafferJDegeestDLiA (2015) Tackling the problem of construct proliferation: A guide to assessing the discriminant validity of conceptually related constructs. Organizational Research Methods19(1): 80–110.
108.
ShevchukAStrebkovDDavisN (2019) The autonomy paradox: How night work undermines subjective well-being of internet-based freelancers. ILR Review72(1): 75–100.
109.
SmithBWDalenJWigginsK, et al (2008) The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine15: 194–200.
110.
SpreitzerGMCameronLGarrettL (2017) Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4(1): 473–499.
111.
StanfordJ (2017) The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review28(3): 382–401.
112.
StegerMFDikBJDuffyRD (2012) Measuring meaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment20(3): 322–337.
113.
StoreyJSalamanGPlatmanK (2005) Living with enterprise in an enterprise economy: Freelance and contract workers in the media. Human Relations58(8): 1033–1054.
114.
TourangeauRRipsLJRasinskiK (2000) The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115.
TranMSokasRK (2017) The gig economy and contingent work: An occupational health assessment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine59(4): e63–e66.
116.
VallasSChristinA (2018) Work and identity in an era of precarious employment: How workers respond to “personal branding” discourse. Work and Occupations45(1): 3–37.
117.
VallasSSchorJB (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology46(1): 273–294.
118.
VeenABarrattTGoodC (2020) Platform-capital’s “app-etite” for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society34(3): 388–406.
119.
VinokurACaplanRA (1987) Attitudes and social support: Determinants of jobseeking behavior and well-being among the unemployed. Journal of Applied Social Psychology17(12): 1007–1024.
120.
WayneJHMatthewsROdle-DusseauH, et al (2019) Fit of role involvement with values: Theoretical, conceptual, and psychometric development of work and family authenticity. Journal of Vocational Behavior115: 1–20.
121.
WeijtersBBaumgartnerH (2012) Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: A review. Journal of Marketing Research49(5): 737–747.
122.
WoodAJGrahamMLehdonvirtaV, et al (2019) Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society33(1): 56–75.
123.
WoodSMichaelidesGTotterdellP (2013) The impact of fluctuating workloads on well being and the mediating role of work−nonwork interference in this relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology18(1): 106–119.
124.
WongSIFieselerCKostD (2020) Digital labourers’ proactivity and the venture for meaningful work: Fruitful or fruitless?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. Epub ahead of print 10 June 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12317.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
