Leadership is a process where leaders enact certain behaviors to influence followers. Yet, each follower may view the leader’s enactment differently, owing to differences in disposition and context. Here we examine leadership as a property attributed by followers to their leader, influenced by both the leader and followers’ personal attributes and the situation in which leaders and followers interact. Guiding this study, we asked: how do followers’ affect (negative and positive traits), motivation (regulatory focus), and cognitions (identity) and their congruence with their leader’s corresponding attributes influence their ratings of transformational leadership? Participants operated in extreme situations where their lives were often at risk because of exposure to combat. Results based on a sample of 1587 US Army soldiers operating in 262 units show that when there is a higher congruence between leaders’ and followers’ positive affect, promotion focus, relational identity, and collective identity, follower ratings of transformational leadership are higher, whereas a higher level of incongruence between followers’ and leaders’ positive and negative affect predicted lower ratings of transformational leadership. These findings differed based on the soldiers’ time spent in deployment and the level of combat exposure they experienced.
AronAAronENSmollanD (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(4): 596–612.
2.
AshforthBESchinoffBSRogersKM (2016) “I identify with her,” “I identify with him”: Unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations. Academy of Management Review41(1): 28–60.
3.
BarlingJLoughlinCKellowayEK (2002) Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology87(3): 488–496.
4.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
5.
BassBM (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics18(3): 19–31.
6.
BassBM (1995) Theory of transformational leadership redux. The Leadership Quarterly6(4): 463–478.
7.
BassBMAvolioBJ (1990) Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
8.
BassBMBassR (2009) The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications (4th edn). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
9.
BaumeisterRFLearyMR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin117(3): 497–529.
10.
BeckATEmeryGGreenbergRL (1985) Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective. New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
BliesePD (2002) Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. In: DrasgowFShmittN (eds) Measuring and Analyzing Behavior in Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 401–455.
12.
BonoJEIliesR (2006) Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. The Leadership Quarterly17(4): 317–334.
13.
BonoJEHooperACYoonDJ (2012) Impact of rater personality on transformational and transactional leadership ratings. The Leadership Quarterly23(1): 132–145.
14.
BoydNGTaylorRR (1998) A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly9(1): 1–25.
15.
BrewerMB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17(5): 475–482.
16.
BrewerMBGardnerW (1996) Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(1): 83–93.
17.
BrocknerJHigginsET (2001) Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes86(1): 35–66.
18.
BrownDJKeepingLM (2005) Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect. Leadership Quarterly16(2): 245–273.
19.
BurnsJMG (1978) Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
20.
CacioppoJTBerntsonGG (1994) Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin115(3): 401–423.
21.
ChenYWenZPengJ, et al. (2016) Leader-follower congruence in loneliness, LMX and turnover intention. Journal of Managerial Psychology31(4): 864–879.
22.
ColbertAEKristof-BrownALBradleyBH, et al. (2008) CEO transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal51(1): 81–96.
23.
CoylePTFotiR (2015) If you’re not with me you’re . . .? Examining prototypes and cooperation in leader–follower relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies22(2): 161–674.
24.
DavidsonRJ (2003) Affective neuroscience and psychophysiology: Toward a synthesis. Psychophysiology40(5): 655–665.
25.
EdwardsJR (1994) The study of congruence in organizational behavior: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes58(1): 51–100.
26.
EdwardsJR (2002) Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In: DrasgowFSchmittNW (eds) Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 350–400.
27.
EdwardsJRCableDM (2009) The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology94(3): 654–677.
28.
EdwardsJRParryME (1993) On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal36(6): 1577–1613.
29.
EdwardsJRRothbardNP (1999) Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes77(2): 85–129.
30.
EhrhartMGKleinKJ (2001) Predicting followers preferences for charismatic leadership: The influence of follower values and personality. The Leadership Quarterly12(2): 153–179.
31.
EpitropakiOMartinR (2005) Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology89(2): 293–310.
32.
FiskeSTTaylorSE (2013) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (2nd edn). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
33.
FotiRHansbroughTKEpitropakiO, et al. (2014) Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership Quarterly25(2): 411–412.
34.
FuchsS (2011) The impact of manager and top management identification on the relationship between perceived organizational justice and change-oriented behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal32(6): 555–583.
35.
HamstraMRVan YperenNWWisseB, et al. (2011) Transformational-transactional leadership styles and followers’ regulatory focus. Journal of Personnel Psychology10(4): 182–186.
36.
HannahSTSowdenWJ (2012) Leadership in the profession of arms. In: RumseyMG (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Leadership. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 291–310.
37.
HannahSTUhl-BienMAvolioBJ, et al. (2009) A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. The Leadership Quarterly20(6): 897–919.
38.
HansbroughTKLordRGSchynsB (2015) Reconsidering the accuracy of follower leadership ratings. The Leadership Quarterly26(2): 220–237.
39.
HaslamSAPlatowMJ (2001) The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(11): 1469–1479.
40.
HigginsET (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist52(12): 1280–1300.
41.
HigginsETIdsonLCFreitasAL, et al. (2003) Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(6): 1140–1153.
42.
HoffmanBJBynumBHPiccoloRF, et al. (2011) Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal54(4): 779–796.
43.
HogeCWCastroCAMesserSC, et al. (2004) Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine351(1): 13–22.
44.
HoggMA (2001) A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review5(3): 184–200.
45.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR (2008) Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6(1): 53–60.
46.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
47.
JacksonCLColquittJAWessonMJ, et al. (2006) Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology91(4): 884–899.
48.
JagoAG (1982) Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management Science28(3): 315–336.
49.
JansenKJKristof-BrownAL (2005) Marching to the beat of a different drummer: Examining the impact of pacing congruence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes97(2): 93–105.
50.
JohnsonRELordRG (2010) Implicit effects of justice on self-identity. Journal of Applied Psychology95(4): 681–695.
51.
JohnsonRESelentaCLordRG (2006) When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes99(2): 175–201.
52.
JosephDLDhananiLYShenW, et al. (2015) Is a happy leader a good leader? A meta-analytic investigation of leader trait affect and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly26(4): 557–576.
53.
JudgeTABonoJE (2000) Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology85(5): 751–765.
54.
JungDIAvolioBJ (2000) Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior21(8): 949–964.
55.
KarkRShamirB (2002) The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collective selves and further effects on followers. Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead2(2): 67–91.
56.
KarkRVan DijkD (2007) Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review32(2): 500–528.
57.
KarkRShamirBChenG (2003) The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology88(2): 246–255.
58.
Kristof-BrownALZimmermanRDJohnsonEC (2005) Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology58(2): 281–342.
59.
LePineMAZhangYCrawfordER, et al. (2016) Turning their pain to gain: Charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Academy of Management Journal59(3): 1036–1059.
60.
LiviSKennyDAAlbrightL, et al. (2008) A social relations analysis of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly19(2): 235–248.
61.
LockwoodPJordanCHKundaZ (2002) Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(4): 854–864.
62.
LordRG (1985) Accuracy in behavioral measurement: An alternative definition based on raters' cognitive schema and signal detection theory. Journal of Applied Psychology70(1): 66–71.
63.
LordRGEmrichCG (2000) Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box. The Leadership Quarterly11(4): 551–579.
64.
LordRGBrownDJFreibergSJ (1999) Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes78(3): 167–203.
65.
LordRGEpitropakiOFotiRJ, et al. (2020) Implicit leadership theories, implicit follower theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior7(1): 49–74.
66.
LuthansFYoussef-MorganCM (2017) Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4: 339–366.
67.
LyonsJBSchneiderTR (2009) The effects of leadership style on stress outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly20(5): 737–748.
68.
MartinkoMJMackeyJDMossSE, et al. (2018) An exploration of the role of subordinate affect in leader evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology103(7): 738–752.
69.
MayerJDSaloveyP (1993) The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence17(4): 433–442.
70.
Mental Health Advisory Team IV (2006) Mental Health Advisory Team (MHAT) IV Operation Iraq Freedom 05–07. Available at: http://www.armymedicine.army.mil (accessed 19 September 2020).
71.
MischelWShodaY (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review102(2): 246–268.
72.
PhillipsJS (1984) The accuracy of leadership ratings: A cognitive categorization perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance33(1): 125–138.
73.
PlatowMJvan KnippenbergD (2001) A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(11): 1508–1519.
74.
RobertsJKMonacoJPStovallH, et al. (2011) Explained variance in multilevel models. In: HoxJJRobertsJK (eds) Handbook of Advanced Multilevel Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge, 219–230.
75.
RubinRSMunzDCBommerWH (2005) Leading from within: The effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Academy of Management Journal48(5): 845–858.
76.
RushMCRussellJEA (1988) Leader prototypes and prototype-contingent consensus in leader behavior descriptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology24(1): 88–104.
77.
ShamirB (2007) Introduction: From passive recipients to active co-producers: The roles of followers in the leadership process. In: ShamirBPillaiRBlighMC, et al (eds) Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to James R. Meindl. Greenwich, CT: Information Age, vii–xxxix.
78.
ShamirBZakayEBreininE, et al. (1998) Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal41(4): 387–409.
79.
ShanockLRBaranBEGentryWA, et al. (2010) Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology25(4): 543–554.
80.
ShondrickSJDinhJELordRG (2010) Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly21(6): 959–978.
81.
SiemsenERothAOliveiraP (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods13(3): 456–476.
82.
SlussDMAshforthBE (2007) Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review32(1): 9–32.
83.
SnijdersTABBoskerRJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: SAGE.
84.
TepperBJDimotakisNLambertLS, et al. (2018) Examining follower responses to transformational leadership from a dynamic, person–environment fit perspective. Academy of Management Journal61(4): 1343–1368.
85.
TsengHCKangLM (2009) Regulatory focus, transformational leadership, uncertainty towards organizational change, and job satisfaction: In a Taiwan’s cultural setting. Asia Pacific Management Review14(2): 215–235.
86.
van KnippenbergDHoggMA (2018) Social identifications in organizational behavior. In: FerrisDLJohnsonRESedikidesC (eds) The Self at Work. New York, NY: Routledge, 72–90.
87.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54(6): 1063–1070.
88.
WatsonDWieseDVaidyaJ, et al. (1999) The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(5): 820–838.
89.
WuJBTsuiASKinickiAJ (2010) Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal53(1): 90–106.
90.
ZhangZWangMOShiJ (2012) Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 111–130.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
