Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-11
Environmentally specific transformational leadership and team pro-environmental behaviors: The roles of pro-environmental goal clarity,pro-environmental harmonious passion,and power distance
Does environmentally specific transformational leadership promote team pro-environmental behaviors? If so, why and when? Using the cognitive-affective processing system framework, we explore the idea that environmentally specific transformational leadership facilitates team pro-environmental behaviors via team pro-environmental goal clarity and team pro-environmental harmonious passion separately and that such indirect relationships are stronger when the team power distance is high. We used three waves of data from 113 teams in six Chinese manufacturing organizations to test our theoretical predictions. The results of regression analyses show that environmentally specific transformational leadership is positively related to team pro-environmental behaviors; this relationship is parallel mediated by team pro-environmental goal clarity and team pro-environmental harmonious passion. Furthermore, the team power distance strengthens the above parallel mediation effects such that in teams with high levels of power distance, environmentally specific transformational leadership strongly provokes team members’ pro-environmental goal clarity, pro-environmental harmonious passion, and subsequent pro-environmental behaviors. These findings suggest that environmentally specific transformational leadership is an effective approach for organizations to improve their teams’ pro-environmental behaviors, particularly in the context of strong power distance.
AfsarBBadirYKianiUS (2016) Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology45: 79–88.
2.
AnandSVidyarthiPRolnickiS (2018) Leader–member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors: Contextual effects of leader power distance and group task interdependence. The Leadership Quarterly29(4): 489–500.
3.
BambergSReesJSeebauerS (2015) Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology43: 155–165.
4.
BartelCASaavedraR (2000) The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly45(2): 197–231.
5.
BernerthJBAguinisH (2016) A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology69(1): 229–283.
6.
BiemannTColeMSVoelpelS (2012) Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly23(1): 66–80.
7.
BissingolsonMJIyerAFieldingKS, et al. (2013) Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior34(2): 156–175.
8.
BoiralOPailléP (2012) Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: Measurement and validation. Journal of Business Ethics109(4): 431–445.
9.
CardonMS (2008) Is passion contagious? The transference of entrepreneurial passion to subordinates. Human Resource Management Review18(2): 77–86.
10.
ChanD (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology83(2): 234–246.
11.
ChenYSChangCHLinYH (2014) Green transformational leadership and green performance: The mediation effects of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Sustainability6(10): 6604–6621.
12.
CherulnikPDDonleyKAWiewelTSR, et al. (2001) Charisma is contagious: The effect of leaders’ charisma on observers’ affect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology31(10): 2149–2159.
13.
ColeMSCarterMZZhangZ (2013) Leader–team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: The mediating role of procedural justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology98(6): 962–973.
14.
DawsonJ (2003) Do we have enough? The accuracy of incomplete data from small groups. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting Best Paper Proceedings, Briarcliff Manor, NY.
15.
DeSimoneJAHarmsPDDeSimoneAJ (2015) Best practice recommendations for data screening. Journal of Organizational Behavior36(2): 171–181.
16.
DorfmanPHowellJP (1988) Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. In: FarmerRNMcGounEG (eds) Advances in International Comparative Management. London: JAI Press, 127–150.
17.
EarleyPC (1999) Playing follow the leader: Status-determining traits in relation to collective efficacy across cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes80(3): 192–212.
18.
EdwardsJRLambertLS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods12(1): 1–22.
19.
EgriCPHermanS (2000) Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal43(4): 571–604.
20.
FarhJLHackettRDLiangJ (2007) Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support – employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal50(3): 715–729.
21.
FritscheIBarthMJugertP, et al. (2018) A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review125(2): 245–269.
22.
GinsbergJMBloomPN (2004) Choosing the right green marketing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review46(1): 79–84.
23.
GravesLMSarkisJZhuQ (2013) How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology35: 81–91.
24.
HarveyJFJohnsonKJRoloffKS, et al. (2019) From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning. Human Relations72(11): 1726–1751.
25.
HatfieldECacioppoJRapsonRL (1994) Emotional Contagion. Paris: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HinkinTR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods1(1): 104–121.
27.
HoVTWongSSLeeCH (2011) A tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies48(1): 26–47.
28.
HofstedeG (1980) Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?Organizational Dynamics9(1): 42–63.
29.
HuJLidenRC (2011) Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology96(4): 851–862.
30.
HuJErdoganBJiangK, et al. (2018) Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. Journal of Applied Psychology103(3): 313–323.
31.
JavidanMDorfmanPWDe LuqueMS, et al. (2006) In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from project globe. Academy of Management Perspectives20(1): 67–90.
32.
KimAKimYHanK (2019) A cross level investigation on the linkage between job satisfaction and voluntary workplace green behavior. Journal of Business Ethics159(4): 1199–1214.
33.
KimAKimYHanK, et al. (2014) Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management43(5): 1335–1358.
34.
KirkmanBLChenGFarhJL, et al. (2009) Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal52(4): 744–764.
35.
KoopmanJLanajKScottBA (2016) Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal59(2): 414–435.
36.
KuraKM (2016) Linking environmentally specific transformational leadership and environmental concern to green behaviour at work. Global Business Review 17(3S): 1S–14S.
37.
LockeEALathamGP (1990) Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science1(4): 240–246.
38.
LockeEALathamGPErezM (1988) The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review13(1): 23–39.
39.
McGrathJE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.
MischelWShodaY (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review102(2): 246–268.
41.
MullerARPfarrerMDLittleLM (2014) A theory of collective empathy in corporate philanthropy decisions. Academy of Management Review39(1): 1–21.
NapierBJFerrisGR (1993) Distance in organizations. Human Resource Management Review3(4): 321–357.
44.
NortonTAZacherHParkerSL, et al. (2017) Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior38(7): 996–1015.
45.
OnesDSDilchertS (2012) Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology5(4): 444–466.
46.
PengJWangZChenX (2019) Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. Journal of Business Ethics159(2): 419–433.
47.
PortugalEYuklG (1994) Perspectives on environmental leadership. Leadership Quarterly5(3–4): 271–276.
48.
RaineriNPailléP (2016) Linking corporate policy and supervisory support with environmental citizenship behaviors: The role of employee environmental beliefs and commitment. Journal of Business Ethics137(1): 129–148.
49.
RichardsonHAVandenbergRJ (2005) Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work-unit level model of employee involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior26(5): 561–589.
50.
RobertsonJL (2018) The nature, measurement and nomological network of environmentally specific transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics151(4): 961–975.
51.
RobertsonJLBarlingJ (2013) Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior34(2): 176–194.
52.
RobertsonJLBarlingJ (2017) Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal38(1): 22–41.
53.
RobertsonJLCarletonE (2018) Uncovering how and when environmental leadership affects employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies25(2): 197–210.
54.
SawyerJE (1992) Goal and process clarity: Specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology77(2): 130–142.
55.
SchaubroeckJLamSSKChaSE (2007) Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 1020–1030.
56.
ShemlaMWeggeJ (2019) Managing diverse teams by enhancing team identification: The mediating role of perceived diversity. Human Relations72(4): 755–777.
57.
StaatsHHarlandPWilkeHAM (2004) Effecting durable change: A team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environment & Behavior36(3): 341–367.
58.
TianQRobertsonJL (2019) How and when does perceived CSR affect employees’ engagement in voluntary pro-environmental behavior?Journal of Business Ethics155(2): 399–412.
59.
VallerandRJSalvySJMageauGA, et al. (2007) On the role of passion in performance. Journal of Personality75(3): 505–533.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
