LautschBKossekEEatonS (2009)
Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations62(6): 795–827https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709104543
2.
ShumateMFulkJ (2004)
Boundaries and role conflict when work and family are colocated: A communication network and symbolic interaction approach. Human Relations57(1): 55–74https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704042714
GibbsJ (2009)
Dialectics in a global software team: Negotiating tensions across time, space, and culture.Human Relations62(6): 905–935https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709104547
5.
BreuerCHüffmeierJHibbenF, et al. (2020)
Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams.Human Relations73(1): 3–34https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718818721
6.
VoelpelSEckhoffRFörsterJ (2008)
David against Goliath? Group size and bystander effects in virtual knowledge sharing. Human Relations61(2): 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707087787
7.
MalhotraAMajchrzakA (2014)
Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies. Human Relations67(4): 389–411https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713495284
8.
Van DyneLKossekELobelS (2007)
Less need to be there: Cross-level effects of work practices that support work-life flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB. Human Relations60(8): 1123–1154https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707081657
