Toilets, a neglected facility in the study of human relations at work and beyond, have become increasingly important in discussions about future experiences of gender diversity. To further investigate the spatial production of gender and its potential expressions, we transformed a unisex single-occupancy toilet at Uppsala University into an all-gender or ‘hir-toilet’.1 With the aim to disrupt and expose the dominant spatial organization of the two binary genders, we inaugurated the hir-toilet with the help of a performance artist. We describe and analyse internal and external responses thereto, using Lefebvre’s work on dialectics and space. Focusing on how space is variously lived, conceived and perceived, our analysis questions the very rationale of gender categorizations. The results contribute to a renewed critique of binary thinking in the organization of workplaces by extending our understanding of how space and human relations mutually constitute each other.
AhonenPTienariJ (2009) United in diversity? Disciplinary normalization in an EU project. Organization16(5): 655–679.
2.
AshcraftLKMuhrSL (2018) Coding military command as a promiscuous practice? Unsettling the gender binaries of leadership metaphors. Human Relations71(2): 206–228.
3.
AshleyF (2021, forthcoming) ‘Trans’ is my gender modality: A modest terminological proposal. In: Erickson-SchrothL (ed.) Trans Bodies, Trans Selves (2nd edn). New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeyesTSteyaertC (2011a) The ontological politics of artistic interventions: Implications for performing action research. Action Research9(1): 100–115.
5.
BeyesTSteyaertC (2011b) Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization19(1): 45–61.
6.
BiehlBReynoldsNS (2018) Chicks with sticks: Becoming a business school Guerilla Knitter. Organizational Aesthetics7(1): 1–10.
7.
BlumVNastH (1996) Where’s the difference? The heterosexualization of alterity in Henri Lefebvre and Jacques Lacan. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14(5): 559–580.
8.
BondiL (1992) Gender and dichotomy. Progress in Human Geography16(1): 98–104.
9.
BorchCBondo HansenKLangeA-C (2015) Markets, bodies, and rhythms: A rhythmanalysis of financial markets from open-outcry trading to high-frequency trading. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space33(6): 1080–1097.
10.
BraidottiR (2006) Posthuman, all too human – Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society23(7–8): 197–208.
11.
BrewisJHamptonPMLinsteadS (1997) Unpacking Priscilla: Subjectivity and identity in the organization of gendered appearance. Human Relations50(10): 1275–1304.
12.
BrowneK (2004) Genderism and the bathroom problem: (Re)materialising sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies. Gender, Place & Culture11(3): 331–346.
13.
BurrellG (1984) Sex and organizational analysis. Organization Studies5(9): 97–118.
14.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
15.
ButlerJ (2007) Genustrubbel: feminism och identitetens subversion. Göteborg: Daidalos.
16.
CavanaghSL (2010) Queering Bathrooms: Gender, Sexuality, and the Hygienic Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
17.
CollinsonD (2005) Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations58(11): 1419–1442.
18.
ConlonD (2004) Productive bodies, performative spaces: Everyday life in Christopher Park. Sexualities7(4): 462–479.
19.
ConnellC (2011) The politics of the stall: Transgender and genderqueer workers negotiating “the bathroom question”. In: BobelCKwanS (eds) Embodied Resistance: Challenging the Norms, Breaking the Rules. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 175–185.
20.
CookAGlassC (2016) Do women advance equity? The effect of gender leadership composition on LGBT-friendly policies in American firms. Human Relations69(7): 1431–1456.
21.
CooperRBurrellG (1988) Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies9(1): 91–112.
22.
DaleKBurrellG (2007) The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space: Power, Identity and Materiality at Work: Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
DickL (2014) The queer frontier: Male same-sex experience in Western Canada’s settlement era. Journal of Canadian Studies48(1): 15–52.
24.
DoughertySDGoldstein HodeM (2016) Binary logics and the discursive interpretation of organizational policy: Making meaning of sexual harassment policy. Human Relations69(8): 1729–1755.
25.
DvorskyGHughesJ (2008) Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary. IEET Monograph Series. Boston, MA: Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET).
26.
Erickson-SchrothL (ed.) (2014) Trans Bodies, Trans Selves: A Resource for the Transgender Community. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Erickson-SchrothLJacobsAL (2017) “You’re in the Wrong Bathroom!” And 20 Other Myths and Misconceptions About Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming People. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
28.
FordJHardingN (2004) We went looking for an organization but could find only the metaphysics of its presence. Sociology38(4): 815–830.
29.
FranckK (1985) Social construction of the physical environment: The case of gender. Sociological Focus18(2): 143–160.
30.
GershensonO (2010) The restroom revolution – Unisex toilets and campus politics. In: MolotchHNorénL (eds) Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing. New York: NUY Press.
31.
GershensonOPennerB (2009) Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
32.
Glick SchillerN (2012) Situating identities: Towards an identities studies without binaries of difference. Identities – Global Studies in Culture and Power19(4): 520–532.
33.
HancockPTylerM (2004) ‘MOT your life’: Critical management studies and the management of everyday life. Human Relations57(5): 619–645.
34.
HansonSPrattG (1995) Gender, Work and Space. London and New York: Routledge.
35.
HardingN (2016) New directions in queer theory: Recent theorizing in the work of Lynne Huffer, Leo Bersani and Adam Phillips, and Lauren Berlant and Lee Edelman. Gender, Work and Organization23(1): 74–83.
36.
HeenH (2005) About feelings in action research: An experiment in first-person inquiry. Action Research3(3): 263–278.
37.
HirstASchwabenlandC (2018) Doing gender in the ‘new office’. Gender, Work and Organization25(2): 159–176.
38.
IrigarayL (1993) An Ethics of Sexual Difference: Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
Isaiah GreenAFollertMOsterlundK, et al. (2010) Space, place and sexual sociality: Towards an ‘atmospheric analysis’. Gender, Work and Organization17(1): 7–27.
40.
JeanesEKnightsDMartinPY (eds) (2011) Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization. Chichester: John Wiley.
41.
JohnstonLLonghurstR (2010) Space, Place and Sex. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
42.
KnightsD (1997) Organization theory in the age of deconstruction: Dualism, gender and postmodernism revisited. Organization Studies18(1): 1–19.
43.
KornbergerMCleggRS (2004) Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies25(7): 1095–1114.
44.
LacanJ (1966/2006) Écrits (FinkB, transl.). New York/London: Norton and Co.
45.
LefebvreH (1987) The everyday and everydayness. LevichC (transl.). Yale French Studies73: 7–11.
46.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space. Nicholson-SmithD (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
47.
LefebvreH (2003) Space and the state. In: BrennerNJessopBJonesM, et al. (eds) State / Space: A Reader. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
LefebvreH (2009) State, Space, World: Selected Essays. BrennerNEldenS (eds); MooreGBrennerNEldenS (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49.
LefebvreH (2013) Rhythmanalysis – Space, Time and Everyday Life. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
50.
LewinK (1946) Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues2(4): 34–46.
51.
LewisP (2014) Postfeminism, femininities and organization studies: Exploring a new agenda. Organization Studies35(12): 1845–1866.
52.
LinsteadSPullenA (2006) Gender as multiplicity: Desire, displacement, difference and dispersion. Human Relations59(9): 1287–1310.
53.
LiuYGreyC (2018) History, gendered space and organizational identity: An archival study of a university building. Human Relations71(5): 640–667.
54.
MartínezE (2017) Invisible in plain sight: A reflection on the potential and perils of an action research study of “positive deviants”. Action Research15(1): 53–56.
55.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
56.
McDonaldJ (2016) Expanding queer reflexivity: The closet as a guiding metaphor for reflexive practice. Management Learning47(4): 391–406.
57.
Meijer CosteraIPrinsB (1998) How bodies come to matter: An interview with Judith Butler. The University of Chicago Press Journals23(2): 275–286.
58.
MengisJNicoliniDGorliM (2018) The video production of space: How different recording practices matter. Organisational Research Methods21(2): 288–315.
59.
MuhrSLSullivanKRRichC (2016) Situated transgressiveness: Exploring one transwoman’s lived experiences across three situated contexts. Gender, Work and Organization23(1): 52–70.
60.
MumbyKD (2005) Theorizing resistance in organization studies. Management Communication Quarterly19(1): 19–44.
61.
MumbyKDStohlC (1991) Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse & Society2(3): 313–332.
62.
PhillipsMPullenARhodesC (2014) Writing organization as gendered practice: Interrupting the libidinal economy. Organization Studies35(3): 313–333.
63.
RanadeS (2007) The way she moves: Mapping the everyday production of gender-space. Economic and Political Weekly42(17): 1519–1526.
64.
RoseE (1978) Generalized self-management: The position of Henri Lefebvre. Human Relations31(7): 617–630.
65.
RumensN (2012) Queering cross-sex friendships: An analysis of gay and bisexual men’s workplace friendships with heterosexual women. Human Relations65(8): 955–978.
66.
RumensNde SouzaEMBrewisJ (2019) Queering queer theory in management and organization studies: Notes toward queering heterosexuality. Organization Studies40(4): 593–612.
67.
ShieldsR (1998) Lefebvre, Love and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics. London and New York: Routledge.
68.
ShorttH (2015) Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations68(4): 633–658.
69.
SlaterJJonesCProcterL (2018) School toilets: Queer, disabled bodies and gendered lessons of embodiment. Gender and Education30(8): 951–965.
70.
SojaWE (1996) Thirdspace Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-imagined Places. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
ThanemT (2011) Embodying transgender in studies of gender, work and organization. In: JeanesEKnightsDYanceyPM (eds) Handbook of Gender, Work & Organization. Chichester: Wiley, 191–204.
73.
ThanemTWallenbergL (2016) Just doing gender? Transvestism and the power of underdoing gender in everyday life and work. Organization23(2): 250–271.
74.
TylerMCohenL (2010) Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies31(2): 175–198.
75.
Van LaerK (2018) The role of co-workers in the production of (homo)sexuality at work: A Foucauldian approach to the sexual identity processes of gay and lesbian employees. Human Relations71(2): 229–255.
76.
WangYYoungJE (2014) Beyond pink and blue: Gendered attitudes towards robots in society. Proceedings of Gender and IT Appropriation. Science and Practice on Dialogue – Forum for Interdisciplinary Exchange, Siegen, Germany, 49–59.
77.
WapshottRMallettO (2012) The spatial implications of homeworking: A Lefebvrian approach to the rewards and challenges of home-based work. Organization19(1): 63–79.
78.
WestCZimmermanHD (1987) Doing gender. Gender and Society1(2): 125–151.
79.
YanowD (2010) Giving voice to space: Academic practices and the material world. In: van MarrewijkAYanowD (eds) Organizational Spaces: Rematerializing the Workaday World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 139–158.
80.
ZhangZSpicerA (2014) ‘Leader, you first’: The everyday production of hierarchical space in a Chinese bureaucracy. Human Relations67(6): 739–762.
