How do we understand the nature of organizational creativity when dealing with complex, composite ideas rather than singular ones? In response to this question, we problematize assumptions of the linearity of creative processes and the singularity of ideas in mainstream creativity theory. We draw on the work of Bakhtin and longitudinal research in two contrasting cases: developing hydrocarbon prospects and concepts for films and TV series. From these two cases, we highlight two forms of work on ideas: (i) intertextual placing, whereby focal ideas are constituted by being connected to other elements in a larger idea field; and (ii) legitimating imaginings, where ideas of what to do are linked to ideas of what is worth doing and becoming. This ongoing constitution and legitimating is not confined to particular stages but takes place in practices of generating, connecting, communicating, evaluating and reshaping ideas, which we call idea work. The article contributes to a better understanding of the processual character of creativity and the deeply intertextual nature of ideas, including the multiplicity of idea content and shifting parts–whole relationships. Idea work also serves to explore the neglected role of co-optative power in creativity.
AlvessonMSandbergJ (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review36(2): 247–271.
2.
AlvessonMSandbergJ (2013) Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies50(1): 128–152.
3.
AndersonNPotočnikKZhouJ (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management40(5): 1297–1333.
4.
AshcraftKLKuhnTRCoorenF (2009) Constitutional amendments: ‘Materializing’ organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals3(1): 1–64.
5.
BaerM (2012) Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal55(5): 1102–1119.
6.
BakhtinMM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
7.
BakhtinMM (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
8.
BakhtinMM (1993) Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
9.
BechkyBAO’MahonyS (2016) Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation. In: ElsbachKDKramerRM (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods. New York, NY: Routledge, 168–176.
10.
BriggsCLBaumanR (1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology2(2): 131–172.
11.
CallonMLawJ (1982) On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science12(4): 615–625.
12.
CarlsenA (2006) Organizational becoming as dialogic imagination of practice: The case of the Indomitable Gauls. Organization Science17(1): 132–149.
13.
CarlsenACleggSGjersvikR (2012) Idea Work: Lessons of the Extraordinary in Everyday Creativity. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
CleggSRHaugaardM (2009) The SAGE Handbook of Power. London: SAGE.
16.
CooperRG (2001) Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
17.
CoorenF (2018) Acting for, with, and through: A relational perspective on agency in MSF’s organizing. In: BrummansBHJM (ed.) The Agency of Organizing. New York, NY: Routledge, 142–169.
18.
CoorenFSandlerS (2014) Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin. Communication Theory24(3): 225–244.
19.
CoorenFKuhnTCornelissenJPet al. (2011) Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies32(9): 1149–1170.
20.
CunliffeACouplandC (2012) From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations65(1): 63–88.
21.
Czarniawska-JoergesBSevónG (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in a Global Economy. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
22.
ElsbachKDKramerRM (2003) Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal46(3): 283–301.
23.
FeldmanMSOrlikowskiWJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science22(5): 1240–1253.
FordC (2009) Prototyping processes that affect organizational creativity. In: TudorRRuncoMAMogerS (eds) The Routledge Companion to Creativity. London: Routledge, 317–326.
26.
GaboraL (2015) Probing the mind behind the (literal and figurative) lightbulb. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts9(1): 20–24.
27.
GarudRGehmanJGiulianiAP (2014) Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy43(7): 1177–1188.
28.
GarudRGehmanJKumaraswamyAet al. (2016) From the process of innovation to innovation as process. In: LangleyATsoukasH (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: SAGE, 451–465.
29.
GeorgeJM (2007) Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals1(1): 439–477.
30.
HargadonA (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth about How Companies Innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
HargadonABechkyBA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science17(4): 484–500.
32.
HargadonADouglasY (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly46(3): 476–501.
33.
HargadonASuttonRI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly42(4): 716–749.
34.
HarrisonSHRouseED (2015) An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal58(2): 375–404.
35.
HarveyS (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review39(3): 324–343.
36.
HarveySKouC-Y (2013) Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly58(3): 346–386.
37.
HennesseyBAAmabileTM (2010) Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology61(1): 569–598.
38.
HolquistM (2002) Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World. London and New York: Psychology Press.
39.
Howard-GrenvilleJGolden-BiddleKIrwinJet al. (2011) Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organization Science22(2): 522–539.
40.
KaufmanJCSternbergRJ (2010) The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KuhnT (2014) Extending the constitutive project: Response to Cooren and Sandler. Communication Theory24(3): 245–251.
42.
LangleyA (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
43.
LangleyASmallmanCTsoukasHet al. (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 1–13.
LockeKGolden-BiddleK (1997) Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and ‘problematizing’ in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal40(5): 1023–1062.
46.
LockeKGolden-BiddleKFeldmanMS (2008) Perspective-making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science19(6): 907–918.
MartineTCoorenF (2016) A relational approach to materiality and organizing: The case of a creative idea. In: IntronaLKavanaghDKellySet al. (eds) Beyond Interpretivism? New Encounters with Technology and Organization. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 143–166.
49.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
MurphyKM (2004) Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity11(4): 267–278.
52.
MørkBEHoholmTMaaninen-OlssonEet al. (2012) Changing practice through boundary organizing: A case from medical R&D. Human Relations65(2): 263–288.
53.
ObstfeldD (2012) Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organization Science23(6): 1571–1592.
54.
PattonMQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
PaulusPDzindoletMKohnN (2011) Collaborative creativity: Group creativity and team innovation. In: MumfordMD (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Creativity. London: Academic Press, 327–357.
56.
Perry-SmithJEMannucciPV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review42(1): 53–79.
57.
RaabTFrodemanR (2002) What is it like to be a geologist? A phenomenology of geology and its epistemological implications. Philosophy & Geography5(1): 69–81.
58.
RhodesC (2000) Ghostwriting research: Positioning the researcher in the interview text. Qualitative Inquiry6(4): 511–525.
59.
Rojas-DrummondSAlbarránCLittletonK (2008) Collaboration, creativity and the co-construction of oral and written texts. Thinking Skills and Creativity3(3): 177–191.
60.
SandbergJTsoukasH (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review36(2): 338–360.
61.
SawyerK (2007) Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.
62.
SawyerRKDeZutterS (2009) Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts3(2): 81–92.
63.
SeidelVPO’MahonyS (2014) Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organization Science25(3): 691–712.
64.
SimontonDK (2004) Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
65.
SomechADrach-ZahavyA (2013) Translating team creativity to innovation implementation. The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management39(3): 684–708.
66.
SonensheinS (2014) How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal57(3): 814–848.
67.
SpradleyJ (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
68.
SternbergRJLubartTI (1999) The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In: SternbergRJ (ed.) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambrige University Press, 3–15.
69.
SuddabyR (2006) From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal49(4): 633–642.
70.
TaylorC (1985) Interpretation and the sciences of man. Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–57.
71.
TsoukasH (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science20(6): 941–957.
72.
WatsonTJ (2011) Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies48(1): 202–217.
73.
WhittleAMuellerF (2008) Intra-preneurship and enrolment: Building networks of ideas. Organization15(3): 445–462.
74.
WoolgarS (2004) Marketing ideas. Economy and Society33(4): 448–462.
75.
ZhouJHoeverIJ (2014) Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior1(1): 333–359.
76.
ZhouJShalleyCE (2008) Expanding the scope and impact of organizational creativity research. In: ZhouJShalleyCE (eds) Handbook of Organizational Creativity Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 347–368.
