We address the centrality of affect in structuring social practices, including those of organizing and managing. Social practices, it is argued, are contingent upon actors’ affectively charged involvement in immanent, yet indeterminate social relations. To understand this generative involvement, we commend a temporally-sensitive, critically-oriented theoretical framework, grounded in an affect-based ontology of practice. We demonstrate the relevance and credibility of this proposal through an analysis of the interactions of Board members in a UK consulting company.
AdlerPAdlerP (1999) The ethnographers’ ball – revisited. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography28(5): 442–450.
2.
AndersonB (2009) Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society2(2): 77–81.
3.
BarbaletJ (2001) Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BhaskarRLaclauE (1998) Discourse theory vs. critical realism. Alethia1(1): 9–14.
5.
BöhmeG (2006) Architektur und Atmosphäre. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
6.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BriefAWeissH (2002) Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology53(1): 279–307.
8.
CederströmKSpicerA (2014) Discourse of the real kind: A post-foundational approach to organizational discourse analysis. Organization21(2): 178–205.
9.
ChiaPMackayB (2007) Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations60(1): 217–242.
10.
ClarkeM (2011) Talkin’ ‘bout a revolution: The social, political, and fantasmatic logics of education policy. Journal of Education Policy27(2): 173–191.
11.
CloughP (ed.) (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
CollinsRMunroR (2010) Exploring the sociological re-imagining of politics: A conversation. The Sociological Review58(4): 548–562.
13.
CorradiGGherardiSVerzelloniL (2010) Ten good reasons for assuming a ‘practice lens’ in organization studies. Management Learning41(3): 265–283.
14.
CostasJFlemingP (2009) Beyond dis-identification: A discursive approach to self-alienation in contemporary organizations. Human Relations62(3): 353–378.
15.
EkmanS (2013) Fantasies about work as limitless potential – how managers and employees seduce each other through dynamics of mutual recognition. Human Relations66(9): 1159–1181.
16.
ElfenbeinH (2007) Emotion in organizations: A review in stages. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley
, Working Paper 01–19–2007.
17.
FinemanS (1993) Emotion in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
FinemanS (2004) Getting the measure of emotion – and the cautionary tale of emotional intelligence. Human Relations57(6): 719–740.
19.
FotakiMLongSSchwartzH (2012) What can psychoanalysis offer organization studies today? Taking stock of current developments and thinking about future directions. Organization Studies33(9): 1105–1120.
20.
FoucaultM (2010) The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983 (ed., DavidsonAI and trans., BurchellG). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
FroshS (2002) Key Concepts in Psychoanalysis. London: The British Library/New York: New York University Press.
22.
GarfinkelH (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
GherardiS (2009) Introduction: The critical power of the practice lens. Management Learning. 40(2): 115–128.
24.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Oxford: Polity Press.
25.
GlynosJ (2003) Self-transgression and freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy6(2): 1–20.
26.
GlynosJ (2010) Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies3(3): 309–335.
27.
GlynosJHowarthD (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
28.
GlynosJHowarthD (2008) Critical explanation in social science: A logics approach. Swiss Journal of Sociology34(1): 5–35.
29.
GlynosJStavrakakisY (2008) Lacan and political subjectivity: Fantasy and enjoyment in psychoanalysis and political theory. Subjectivity24(1): 256–274.
30.
GlynosJHowarthDNorvalASpeedE (2009) Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review paper NCRM/014, National Centre for Research Methods.
31.
GlynosJKlimeckiRWillmottH (2012) Cooling out the marks: The identity and politics of the financial crisis. Journal of Cultural Economy5(3): 297–320.
32.
GlynosJKlimeckiRWillmottH (2015) Logics in policy and practice: A critical nodal analysis of the UK banking reform process. Critical Policy Studies. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.009841.
33.
GlynosJSpeedEWestK (2014) Logics of marginalisation in health and social care reform: Integration, choice, and provider-blind provision. Critical Social Policy35(1): 45–68.
HowarthD (2012) Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies3(3–4): 309–335.
39.
HowarthD (2013) Poststructuralism and After: Structure, Subjectivity and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
HynesM (2013) Reconceptualizing resistance: Sociology and the affective dimension of resistance. The British Journal of Sociology64(4): 559–577.
41.
JanssonN (2013) Organizational change as practice: A critical analysis. Organizational Change Management26(6): 1003–1019.
42.
JorgensenD (1989) Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
43.
KempC (2010) Building bridges between structure and agency: Exploring the theoretical potential for a synthesis between habitus and reflexivity. Essex Graduate Journal of Sociology10: 4–12.
44.
KingD (2009) Journeys into critical thinking: Intersecting Foucault into the organizational practice debate. In: Wolfram CoxJLeTrent-JonesTVoronovMWeirD (eds) Critical Management Studies at Work. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 130–143.
45.
KnightsDWillmottH (1989) Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology23(4): 535–558.
46.
LaclauE (1993) Discourse. In: GoodinREPettitP (eds) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 431–437.
47.
LaclauE (1995) The time is out of joint. Diacritics25(2): 86–96.
48.
LaclauE (2000) Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In: ButlerJLaclauEZizekS (eds) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (Phronesis). London: Verso, 44–89.
49.
LaclauEMouffeC (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
LokJDe RondM (2013) On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns and the Cambridge University boat club. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 185–207.
52.
LokJWillmottH (2013) Identities and identifications in organizations: Dynamics of antipathy, deadlock, and alliance. Journal of Management Enquiry23(3): 215–230
53.
LugosiP (2006) Between overt and covert research: Concealment and disclosure in an ethnographic study of commercial hospitality. Qualitative Inquiry12(3): 541–561.
54.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
55.
MiddletonDBrownSD (2005) The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. London: SAGE.
56.
MillerJM (2001) Covert participant observation: Reconsidering the least used method. In: MillerJMTewksburyR (eds) Extreme Methods: Innovative Approaches to Social Science Research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 13–21.
57.
NicoliniD (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
OrumAMFeaginJRSjobergG (1991) The nature of the case study. In: FeaginJROrumAMSjobergG (eds) A Case for the Case Study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
59.
RouseJ (2001) Two concepts of practices. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKVon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, 189–198.
60.
SandbergJTsoukasH (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorising through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review36(2): 338–360.
61.
SchmidtDGibsonD (2010) Emotions in ethics and the workplace: How can feelings be integrated into business pedagogy? In: 13th Annual Colleagues in Jesuit Business Education (CJBE) Conference. Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
62.
ShotterJ (2011) Reflections on sociomateriality and dialogicality in organization studies: From ‘inter-’ to ‘intra-thinking’… in performing practices. Paper for submission to the book series Perspectives on Process Organization Studies (P-PROS), Volume 3, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Process Organization Studies in Corfu, 16–18 June.
63.
SiebenB (2007) Doing research on emotion and virtual work: A compass to assist orientation. Human Relations60(4): 561–580.
64.
SiebenBWettergrenÅ (2010) Emotionalizing Organizations and Organizing Emotions. New York: Palgrave. Macmillan.
65.
SimpsonBMarshallN (2010) The mutuality of emotions and learning in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry19(4): 351–365.
66.
StakeRE (1978) The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher7: 5–8.
67.
StennerP (2008) A.N. Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity22(1): 90–109.
68.
SternD (2004) The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: Norton.
69.
SturdyA (2003) Knowing the unknowable? A discussion of methodological and theoretical issues in emotion research and organization studies. Organization10(1): 81–105.
70.
ThompsonM (2011) Ontological shift or ontological drift? Reality claims, epistemological frameworks and theory generation in organization studies. Academy of Management Review36(4): 754–773.
71.
ThompsonM (2012) People, practice, and technology: Restoring Giddens’ broader philosophy to the study of information systems. Information and Organization22(3): 188–207.
Van MaanenJ (1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
75.
VoronovMVinceR (2012) Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review37(1): 58–81.
76.
WagenaarH (2011) Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
77.
WalkerdineV (2010) Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body & Society16(1): 91–116.
78.
WebsterJ (2008) Establishing the ‘truth’ of the matter: Confessional reflexivity as introspection and avowal. Psychology & Society1(1): 65–76.
79.
WestK (2011) Articulating discursive and materialist conceptions of practice in the logics approach to critical policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies5(4): 414–433.
80.
WetherellM (2012) Affect and Emotion. London: SAGE.
81.
WillmottHC (1986) Unconscious sources of motivation in the theory of the subject: An exploration and critique of Giddens’ dualistic models of action and personality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour16(1): 105–122.
82.
ZienkowskiJ (2012) Overcoming the post-structuralist methodological deficit – metapragmatic markers and interpretive logics in a critique of the Bologna process. Pragmatics22(3): 501–534.
83.
ŽĭzekS (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
