Building on social comparison theory, we posit that a firm’s pay dispersion affects its innovation through employee participation and voluntary turnover. By analyzing data collected at both employee and organizational levels from 1419 firms, we found that pay dispersion had an inverted U-shaped effect on employee participation, which in turn enhanced innovation. Pay dispersion had a positive effect on voluntary turnover, which in turn impaired innovation. These findings contribute to research on economic inequity by revealing the mediation mechanisms of employee participation and voluntary turnover in the relationship between pay dispersion and organizational innovation.
AbelsonMABaysingerBD (1984) Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. Academy of Management Review9(2): 331–341.
2.
AdamsJS (1963) Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology67(5): 422–436.
3.
AguinisHO’BoyleE (2014) Star performers in twenty-first century organizations. Personnel Psychology67(2): 313–350.
4.
AguinisHO’BoyleEGonzalez-MuléEJooH (in press) Cumulative advantage: Conductors and insulators of heavy-tailed productivity distributions and productivity stars. Personnel Psychology.
5.
AikenLSWestSG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
6.
ArthurJBAiman-SmithL (2001) Gainsharing and organizational learning: An analysis of employee suggestions over time. Academy of Management Journal44(4): 737–754.
7.
BarberAESimmeringMJ (2002) Understanding pay plan acceptance: The role of distributive justice theory. Human Resource Management Review12(1): 25–42.
8.
BauerTNBodnerTErdoganB. (2007) Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology92(3): 707–721.
9.
BeaumontPBHarrisRID (2003) Internal wage structures and organizational performance. British Journal of Industrial Relations41(1): 53–70.
10.
BeckJWBeattyASSackettPR (2014) On the distribution of job performance: The role of measurement characteristics in observed departures from normality. Personnel Psychology67(3): 531–566.
11.
BloomM (1999) The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal42(1): 25–40.
12.
BrownMPSturmanMCSimmeringMJ (2003) Compensation policy and organizational performance: The efficiency, operational, and financial implications of pay levels and pay structure. Academy of Management Journal46(6): 752–762.
13.
BucciolAFossNJPiovesanM (2014) Pay dispersion and performance in teams. PLoS ONE9(11): e112631.
14.
BuddJWGollanPJWilkinsonA (2000) New approaches to employee voice and participation in organizations. Human Relations63(3): 303–310.
15.
CampbellBAGancoMFrancoAMAgarwalR (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management Journal33(1): 65–87.
16.
CarnahanSAgarwalRCampbellBA (2012) Heterogeneity in turnover: The effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers. Strategic Management Journal33(12): 1411–1430.
17.
ChristieAMBarlingJ (2010) Beyond status: Relating status inequality to performance and health in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology95(5): 920–934.
18.
CohenWMLevinthalDA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152.
19.
ConnellyBLHaynesKTTihanyiL. (2014) Minding the gap: Antecedents and consequences of top management-to-worker pay dispersion. Journal of Management. DOI: 10.1177/0149206313503015.
20.
CookeWN (1994) Employee participation programs, group-based incentives, and company performance: A union-nonunion comparison. Industrial & Labor Relations Review47(4): 594–609.
21.
CottonJLVollrathDAFroggattKL. (1988) Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review13(1): 8–22.
22.
CowherdDMLevineDI (1992) Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly37(4): 302–320.
23.
DessGGShawJD (2001) Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review26(3): 446–456.
24.
DessGGLumpkinGTCovinJG (1997) Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal18(9): 677–695.
25.
DingDZAkhtarSGeGL (2009) Effects of inter-and intra-hierarchy wage dispersions on firm performance in Chinese enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management20(11): 2370–2381.
26.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7(2): 117–170.
27.
FranckENueschS (2011) The effect of wage dispersion on team outcome and the way team outcome is produced. Applied Economics43(23): 3037–3049.
28.
FrickBPrinzJWinkelmannK (2003) Pay inequalities and team performance: Empirical evidence from the North American major leagues. International Journal of Manpower24(4): 472–488.
29.
GallieD (2013) Direct participation and the quality of work. Human Relations66(4): 453–473.
30.
GoodmanPS (1977) Social comparison processes in organizations. In: SalancikGStawB (eds) New Directions in Organizational Behavior. Chicago, IL: St. Clair Press, 97–132.
31.
GrundCWestergaard-NielsenN (2008) The dispersion of employees’ wage increases and firm performance. Industrial and Labor Relations Review61(4): 485–501.
32.
HeymanF (2005) Pay inequality and firm performance: Evidence from matched employer-employee data. Applied Economics37(11): 1313–1327.
33.
HibbsDALockingH (2000) Wage dispersion and productive efficiency: Evidence for Sweden. Journal of Labor Economics18(4): 755–782.
34.
JewellRTMolinaDJ (2004) Productive efficiency and salary distribution: The case of US Major League Baseball. Scottish Journal of Political Economy51(1): 127–142.
35.
KepesSDeleryJGuptaN (2009) Contingencies in the effects of pay range on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology62(3): 497–531.
36.
LeonardDSensiperS (1998) The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review40(3): 112–132.
37.
LewisKHerndonB (2011) Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science22(5): 1254–1265.
38.
MellahiKWilkinsonA (2010) Slash and burn or nip and tuck? Downsizing, innovation and human resources. International Journal of Human Resource Management21(13): 2291–2305.
39.
MorrisMHKuratkoDF (2002) Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development within Organizations. Mason, OH: South-Western College.
40.
NickersonJAZengerTR (2008) Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal29(13): 1429–1449.
41.
O’BoyleEAguinisH (2012) The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology65(1): 79–119.
42.
PfefferJLangtonN (1993) The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 382–407.
43.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-YPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
44.
ReagansRMcEvilyB (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly48(2): 240–267.
45.
SawyerRK (2006) Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
SchulerRS (1986) Fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship in organizations: Implications for organization structure and human resource management practices. Human Resource Management25(4): 607–629.
47.
SeligJPPreacherKJ (2008) Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Available at: http://quantpsy.org/.
48.
SelsLDe WinneSMaesJ. (2006) Unravelling the HRMperformance link: Value-creating and cost-increasing effects of small business HRM. Journal of Management Studies43(2): 319–342.
49.
ShawJDDeleryJEJenkinsGDGuptaN (1998) An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal41(5): 511–525.
50.
ShawJDDuffyMKJohnsonJLLockhartDE (2005) Turnover, social capital losses, and performance. Academy of Management Journal48(4): 594–606.
51.
ShawJDGuptaNDeleryJE (2002) Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence. Strategic Management Journal23(6): 491–512.
52.
SongXMMontoya-WeissMMSchmidtJB (1997) Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. Journal of Product Innovation Management14(1): 35–47.
53.
StainbackKTomaskovic-DeveyDSkaggsS (2010) Organizational approaches to inequality: Inertia, relative power, and environments. Annual Review of Sociology36(1): 225–247.
54.
Statistics Canada (2002) Guide to the Analysis of the Workplace and Employee Survey 2000. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
55.
ThornhillS (2006) Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing21(5): 687–703.
56.
ThornhillSWhiteRE (2007) Strategic purity: A multi-industry evaluation of pure vs. hybrid business strategies. Strategic Management Journal28(5): 553–561.
57.
TrevorCOReillyGGerhartB (2012) Reconsidering pay dispersion’s effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal55(3): 585–610.
58.
UtterbackJAbernathyW (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. OMEGA3(6): 639–656.
59.
WalsworthSVermaA (2007) Globalization, human resource practices and innovation: Recent evidence from the Canadian workplace and employee survey. Industrial Relations46(2): 222–240.
60.
WilliamsLJEdwardsJRVandenbergRJ (2003) Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management29(6): 903–936.
61.
YanadoriYCuiV (2013) Creating incentives for innovation? The relationship between pay dispersion in R&D groups and firm innovation performance. Strategic Management Journal34(12): 1502–1511.
62.
YangHKlaasBS (2011) Pay dispersion and the financial performance of the firm: Evidence from Korea. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(1): 2147–2166.
63.
YangYKonradAM (2011) Diversity and organizational innovation: The role of employee involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior32(8): 1062–1083.
64.
ZengerTR (1994) Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Science40(6): 708–729.
