I present a dyadic process model to explain the emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor–subordinate interaction. Based on a social exchange framework, the model draws on organizational justice and previous abusive supervision research, as well as insights from behavioral ethics literature. I argue that the emergence of abusive supervision originates from initial subordinate perceptions of supervisor injustice. When reconciliation does not occur, subordinate perceptions of supervisor injustice and supervisor perceptions of inadequate subordinate (response) behavior may accumulate and thereby increasingly reinforce one another in an escalating spiral. It is proposed that perceptions of power asymmetry inhibit reconciliation attempts (e.g. remedial voice) systematically. Eventually, the tipping point of intentional supervisor hostility is reached and crossed. I offer research propositions and discuss implications for future abusive supervision research.
AnderssonLMPearsonCM (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review24(3): 452–471.
2.
AndiappanMTreviñoLK (2011) Beyond righting the wrong: Supervisor–subordinate reconciliation after an injustice. Human Relations64(3): 359–386.
3.
AntonioniD (1994) The effect of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology47(2): 349–356.
4.
AquinoKReedA (2002) The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(6): 1423–1440.
5.
AquinoKTrippTMBiesRJ (2001) How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology86(1): 52–59.
6.
AquinoKTrippTMBiesRJ (2006) Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology91(3): 653–668.
7.
AryeeSChenZXSunLYDebrahYA (2007) Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology92(1): 191–201.
8.
BanduraA (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review3(3): 193–209.
9.
BarclayLJSkarlickiDP (2009) Healing the wounds of organizational injustice: Examining the benefits of expressive writing. Journal of Applied Psychology94(2): 511–523.
10.
BarskyAKaplanSABealDJ (2011) Just feelings? The role of affect in the formation of organizational fairness judgments. Journal of Management37(1): 248–279.
11.
BerkowitzL (1993) Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
BiesRJTrippTM (1998) Two faces of the powerless: Coping with tyranny. In: KramerRMNealeMA (eds) Power and Influence in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 203–219.
13.
BiesRJTrippTM (2002) Hot flashes, open wounds: Injustice and the tyranny of its emotions. In: SteinerDDSkarlickiDOGilliandSW (eds) Emerging Perspectives on Managing Organizational Justice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 203–223.
14.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
BolgerNDavisARafaeliE (2003) Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology54: 579–616.
16.
BoswellWROlson-BuchananJB (2004) Experiencing mistreatment at work: The role of grievance-filing, nature of mistreatment, and employee withdrawal. Academy of Management Journal47(1): 129–139.
17.
BradfieldMAquinoK (1999) The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management25(5): 607–631.
18.
BriefAPWeissHM (2002) Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology53: 279–307.
19.
BurtonJPHooblerJM (2011) Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology52(4): 389–398.
20.
CalderBJ (1977) An attribution theory of leadership. In: StawBMSalancikGR (eds) New Directions in Organizational Behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press, 179–204.
21.
CarlsonDFergusonMHunterEWhittenD (2012) Abusive supervision and work–family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout. Leadership Quarterly23(5): 849–859.
22.
ChiS-CSLiangS-G (2013) When do subordinates’ emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates’ emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. Leadership Quarterly24(1): 125–137.
23.
ClugstonMHowellJPDorfmanPW (2000) Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment?Journal of Management26(1): 5–30.
24.
CojuharencoIPatientDBashshurMR (2011) Seeing the ‘forest’ or the ‘trees’ of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes116(1): 17–31.
25.
ColquittJAConlonDEWessonMJPorterCOLHNgKY (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 425–445.
26.
CropanzanoRMitchellMS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31(6): 874–900.
27.
CropanzanoRByrneZSBobocelDRRuppDE (2001) Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior58(2): 164–209.
28.
CrossleyCD (2009) Emotional and behavioral reactions to social undermining: A closer look at perceived offender motives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes108(1): 14–24.
29.
El AkremiAVandenbergheCCamermanJ (2010) The role of justice and social exchange relationships in workplace deviance: Test of a mediated model. Human Relations63(11): 1687–1717.
30.
FarrellD (1983) Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal26(4): 596–607.
31.
FelsonRB (1982) Impression management and the escalation of aggression and violence. Social Psychology Quarterly45(4): 245–254.
32.
FiskeST (1993) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist48(6): 621–628.
33.
FolgerRCropanzanoR (1998) Organizational Justice and Human Relations Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
FolgerRCropanzanoR (2001) Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In: GreenbergJCropanzanoR (eds) Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1–55.
35.
FrenchJRPRavenB (1959) The bases of social power. In: CartwrightD (ed.) Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 150–167.
36.
FroneMR (2000) Interpersonal conflict at work and psychological outcomes: Testing a model among young workers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology5(2): 246–255.
37.
GreenSGMitchellTR (1979) Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance23(3): 429–458.
38.
GreenbergLBarlingJ (1996) Employee theft. In: CooperCLRousseauDM (eds) Trends in Organizational Behavior. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 49–64.
39.
GuoJRuppDEWeissHMTrougakosJP (2011) Organizational justice: A person-centric approach. In: GillilandSWSteinerDDSkarlickiDP (eds) Emerging Perspectives on Organizational Justice and Ethics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 3–32.
40.
HarlosKP (2010) If you build a remedial voice mechanism, will they come? Determinants of voicing interpersonal mistreatment at work. Human Relations63(3): 311–329.
41.
HarrisKKacmarKZivnuskaS (2007) An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. Leadership Quarterly18(3): 252–263.
42.
HirschmanA (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
44.
JamesK (1993) The social context of organizational justice: Cultural, intergroup, and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions. In: CropanzanoR (ed.) Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 21–50.
45.
JohnOPGrossJJ (2004) Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality72(6): 1301–1333.
46.
JonesDASkarlickiDP (2005) The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority’s fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment. Journal of Applied Psychology90(2): 363–372.
47.
JudgeTAPiccoloRFTomekK (2009) The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly20(6): 855–875.
48.
KeltnerDRobinsonRJ (1997) Defending the status quo: Power and bias in social conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23(10): 1066–1077.
49.
KetsdeVriesMFR (1990) The organizational fool: Balancing a leader’s hubris. Human Relations43(8): 751–770.
50.
KimSHSmithRHBrighamNL (1998) Effects of power imbalance and the presence of third parties on reactions to harm: Upward and downward revenge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24(4): 353–361.
51.
KlaasBSDeNisiAS (1989) Managerial reactions to employee dissent: The impact of grievance activity on performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal32(4): 705–717.
52.
KohlbergL (1981) The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
53.
LangleyA (2009) Studying processes in and around organizations. In: BuchananDABrymanA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: SAGE, 409–429.
54.
LavelleJJRuppDEBrocknerJ (2007) Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management33(6): 841–866.
55.
LewinD (1987) Dispute resolution in the nonunion firm. Journal of Conflict Resolution31(3): 465–502.
56.
Marcus-NewhallAPedersenWCCarlsonMMillerN (2000) Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(4): 670–689.
57.
MartinkoMJHarveyPDouglasSC (2007) The role, function, and contribution of attribution theory to leadership: A review. Leadership Quarterly18(6): 561–585.
58.
MartinkoMJHarveyPSikoraDDouglasSC (2011) Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. Leadership Quarterly22(4): 751–764.
59.
MitchellMSAmbroseML (2007) Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 1159–1168.
60.
MitchellTRGreenSGWoodRE (1981) An attributional model of leadership and the poor performing subordinate: Development and validation. In: CummingsLLStawBM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 197–234.
61.
MorrisonEWMillikenFJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review25(4): 706–725.
62.
O’ReillyJAquinoK (2011) A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review36(3): 526–543.
63.
OakesPJHaslamSATurnerJC (1994) Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
64.
Olson-BuchananJB (1996) Voicing discontent: What happens to the grievance filer after the grievance?Journal of Applied Psychology81(1): 52–63.
65.
Olson-BuchananJBBoswellWR (2002) The role of employee loyalty and formality in voicing discontent. Journal of Applied Psychology87(6): 1167–1174.
66.
Olson-BuchananJBBoswellWR (2008) An integrative model of experiencing and responding to mistreatment at work. Academy of Management Review33(1): 76–96.
67.
OpotowS (1990) Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues46(1): 1–20.
68.
PeirceRSPruittDGCzajaSJ (1993) Complainant-respondent differences in procedural choice. International Journal of Conflict Management4(3): 199–222.
69.
RestubogSLDScottKLZagenczykTJ (2011) When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology96(4): 713–729.
70.
RuppDECropanzanoR (2002) The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes89(1): 925–946.
71.
RuppDEPaddockEL (2010) From justice events to justice climate: A multi-level temporal model of information aggregation and judgment. In: MannixEANealeMAMullenE (eds) Fairness and Groups: Research on Managing Groups and Teams. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 245–273.
72.
ShaoRRuppDESkarlickiDPJonesKS (2013) Employee justice across cultures: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management39(1): 263–301.
73.
SkarlickiDPFolgerR (1997) Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology82(3): 434–443.
74.
SkarlickiDPFolgerRTeslukP (1999) Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal42(1): 100–108.
75.
SyT (2010) What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes113(2): 73-84.
76.
TepperBJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal43(2): 178–190.
77.
TepperBJ (2007) Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management33(3): 261–289.
78.
TepperBJDuffyMKShawJD (2001) Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology86(5): 974–983.
TepperBJMossSELockhartDECarrJC (2007) Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal50(5): 1169–1180.
81.
TepperBJCarrJCBreauxDMGeiderSHuCHuaW (2009) Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees workplace deviance – A power-dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes109(2): 156–167.
82.
TepperBJMossSEDuffyMK (2011) Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal54(2): 279–294.
83.
TrippTMBiesRJAquinoK (2007) A vigilante model of justice: Revenge, reconciliation, forgiveness, and avoidance. Social Justice Research20(1): 10–34.
84.
TurnleyWHFeldmanDC (1999) The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Human Relations52(7): 895–922.
85.
Uhl-BienM (2006) Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly17(6): 654–676.
86.
Uhl-BienMMaslynJM (2003) Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management29(4): 511–532.
87.
Van den BosK (2003) On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(3): 482–498.
88.
Van den BosKBurrowsJWUmphressE. (2005) Prior experiences as temporal frames of reference in social justice: The influence of previous fairness experiences on reactions to new and old supervisors. Social Justice Research18(2): 99–120.
89.
VandekerckhoveWCommersMSR (2003) Downward workplace mobbing: A sign of the times?Journal of Business Ethics45(1–2): 41–50.
90.
WallJAStarkJBStandiferRL (2001) Mediation: A current review and theory development. Journal of Conflict Resolution45(3): 370–391.
91.
WatzlawickPBeavinJHJacksonDD (1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
92.
WeissHMCropanzanoR (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In: StawBMCummingsLL (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1–74.
93.
WoodREMitchellTR (1981) Manager behavior in a social context: The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance28(3): 356–378.
94.
XinKPelledLH (2003) Supervisor–subordinate conflict and perceptions of leadership behavior: A field study. Leadership Quarterly14(1): 25–40.
95.
YuklGFalbeCM (1991) Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology76(3): 416–423.
96.
ZapfD (2002) Emotion work and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review12(2): 237–268.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
