Relational resources are now recognized as significant factors in workplaces and increasing attention is being given to the motivational impact of giving, in addition to receiving social support. Our study builds on this work to determine the role of such relational mechanisms in work engagement, a concept that simultaneously captures drive and well-being. Data from 182 midwives from two maternity hospitals revealed a best-fit model where perceived supervisor support, social support from peers, prosocial impact on others and autonomy explained 52 percent of variance in work engagement. Perceived prosocial impact acted as a significant partial mediator between autonomy and work engagement. This study provides evidence for the importance of perceived prosocial impact and the role of immediate supervisors in facilitating work engagement in midwifery. Results highlight the value of relational resources and suggest their explicit inclusion in current models of work engagement.
AnderssonLMPearsonCM (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review24(3): 452–471.
2.
BakkerABAlbrechtSLLeiterMP (2011) Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology20(1): 74–88.
3.
BakkerABBalPM (2010) Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology83(1): 189–206.
4.
BakkerABDemeroutiE (2007) The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology22(3): 309–328.
5.
BakkerABHakanenJJDemeroutiEXanthopoulouD (2007) Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology99(2): 274–284.
6.
BandalosDLFinneySJ (2001) Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In: MarcoulidesGASchumackerRE (eds) New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 269–296.
7.
BatsonCD (1994) Prosocial motivation: Why do we help others? In: TesserA (ed.) Advanced Social Psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 333–381.
8.
BergJMDuttonJEWrzesniewskiA (2007) What is Job Crafting and Why Does it Matter?University of Michigan, Ross School of Business: Center for Positive Organizational Scholarship, 1–8.
9.
BrowneMWCudeckR (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BollenKALongJS (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 136–162.
10.
CortinaLMMagleyVJ (2009) Patterns and profiles of responses to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology14(3): 272–288.
11.
CutronaCERussellD (1987) The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. In: JonesWHPerlmanD (eds) Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 37–67.
12.
DemeroutiEBakkerABNachreinerFSchaufeliWB (2001) The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology80: 499–512.
13.
DemeroutiEMostertKBakkerAB (2010) Burnout and work engagement: A thorough investigation of the independency of both constructs. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology15(3): 209–222.
14.
EdwardsJR (2008) Person-environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. Academy of Management Annals2(1): 167–230.
15.
EisenbergerRStinglhamberFVandenbergheCSucharskiILRhoadesL (2002) Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology87(3): 565–573.
16.
EngelbrechtS (2006) Motivation and burnout in human service work: The case of midwifery in Denmark. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.
17.
FreeneyYMTiernanJ (2009) Exploration of the facilitators of and barriers to work engagement in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies46(12): 1557–1565.
18.
GrantAM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review32(2): 393–417.
19.
GrantAM (2008) The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology93(1): 108–124.
20.
GrantAMHofmannDA (2011) It’s not all about me: Motivating hospital hand hygiene by focusing on patients. Psychological Science22(12): 1494–1499.
21.
GrantAMParkerSK (2009) Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals3(1): 317–375.
22.
GrantAMSonnentagS (2010) Doing good buffers against feeling bad: Prosocial impact compensates for negative task and self-evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes111(1): 13–22.
23.
HackmanJROldhamGR (1980) Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
HakanenJJPerhoniemiRToppinen-TannerS (2008) Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative, and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior73(1): 78–91.
25.
HalbeslebenJR (2006) Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology91(5): 1134–1145.
26.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
27.
HumphreySENahrgangJDMorgesonFP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology92(5): 1332–1356.
28.
JonesMCJohnstonDW (2012) Does clinical incident seriousness and receipt of work-based support influence mood experienced by nurses at work? A behavioural diary study. International Journal of Nursing Studies49(8): 978–987.
29.
KPMG (2008) Independent Review of Maternity and Gynaecology Services in the Greater Dublin Area. Dublin, Ireland: KPMG.
30.
LeiterMPLaschingerHSDayAGilin-OoreD (2011) The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology96(6): 1258–1274.
31.
MacDonaldC (2002) Nursing autonomy as relational. Nursing Ethics9(2): 194–201.
32.
MackinPSinclairM (2003) Labour ward midwives’ perception of stress. Journal of Advanced Nursing27(5): 986–991.
33.
MaslachCLeiterMP (1997) The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do About It. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
MaunoSKinnunenURuokolainenM (2007) Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior70(1): 149–171.
35.
MorgesonFPHumphreySE (2006) The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology91(6): 1321–1339.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology63: 539–569.
38.
RayEBMillerKI (1994) Social support, home/work stress, and burnout: Who can help?Journal of Applied Behavioral Science30(3): 357–373.
39.
RichardsonHASimmeringMJSturmanMC (2009) A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods12(4): 762–800.
40.
RyffCSingerB (1998) The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry9(1): 1–28.
41.
SchaufeliWBBakkerAB (2004) Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour25(3): 293–315.
42.
SchaufeliWBSalanovaMGonzález-RomáVBakkerAB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies3(1): 71–92.
43.
SeppäläPMaunoSFeldtTHakanenJKinnunenUTolvanenASchaufeliW (2009) The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies10(4): 459–481.
44.
ShroutPEBolgerN (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods7(4): 422–445.
45.
SimpsonMR (2009) Predictors of work engagement among medical-surgical nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research31(1): 44–65.
46.
SonnentagSMojzaEJDemeroutiEBakkerAB (2012) Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology97(4): 842–853.
47.
TuckeyMBakkerABDollardMF (2012) Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology17(1): 15–27.
48.
VermeulenMMustardC (2000) Gender differences in job strain, social support at work, and psychological distress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology5(4): 428–440.
49.
WatsonD (2000) Mood and Temperament. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
50.
WrzesniewskiADuttonJE (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review26(2): 179–201.
51.
XanthopoulouDBakkerABDemeroutiESchaufeliWB (2007) The role of personal resources in the Job Demands-Resources Model. International Journal of Stress Management14(2): 121–141.
52.
XanthopoulouDBakkerABDemeroutiESchaufeliWB (2009) Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior74(3): 235–244.
53.
XanthopoulouDBakkerABHeuvenEDemeroutiESchaufeliWB (2008) Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among cabin attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology13(4): 345–356.
