The aim of this article is to unravel the gendered practices in ambition and challenge the hegemonic masculinity within it. Our findings are based on a qualitative study using focus groups in which Dutch men and women, full-timers and part-timers, constructed different meanings of ambition. The men and women in our study used three manifest discourses of ambition in the workplace, regarding individual development, mastery of the task, and upward career mobility. A critical analysis of these three discourses indicates how cultural and organizational norms on gender and working hours affect these constructions of ambition. We argue that a fourth discourse, ‘ambition as a resource’, is a major driving force of inequality. ‘Ambition as a resource’ is the dominant hegemonic discourse in organizations, and its power effects mitigate the impact of other discourses on ambition, revealing the potential for change when different discourses of ambition are valued.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society20(4): 441–464.
3.
AlvessonM (1998) Gender relations and identity at work: A case study of masculinities and femininities in an advertising agency. Human Relations51(8): 969–1005.
4.
AlvessonMBillingY (2009) Understanding Gender and Organizations. London: SAGE.
5.
AlvessonMSköldbergK (2009) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
6.
ArendellT (1997) Reflections on the researcher-researched relationship: A woman interviewing men. Qualitative Sociology20(3): 341–368.
7.
BassBStogdillR (1990) Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. New York: The Free Press.
8.
BenschopY (1996) De Mantel der Gelijkheid. Gender in Organisaties [Covered by Equality. Gender in Organizations]. Assen: Van Gorcum.
9.
BenschopYDoorewaardH (1998) Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies19(5): 787–805.
10.
BenschopYBleijenberghIVan den BrinkMPetersPFokkingaBPasB (2009) Ambitie Kent Geen Tijd [Ambition Without Time]. Den Haag: Taskforce Deeltijd+.
11.
BergerPLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Knowledge: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
12.
BicknellMLiefoogheA (2006) The art of stress. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology79(3): 377–394.
13.
BloorM (2001) Focus Groups in Social Research. London: SAGE.
14.
BrounsMBosmanRVan LamoenI (2004) Een Kwestie Van Kwaliteit. Loopbanen Van Cum Laude Gepromoveerde Mannen en Vrouwen [A Question of Quality. Careers of Men and Women who Obtained their PhD with Honors (‘Cum Laude’)]. Groningen: Facultair bedrijf RUG.
15.
Bruyn-HundtM (1988) Vrouwen Op de Arbeidsmarkt [The Labor Market Position of Women]. Utrecht: Spectrum.
16.
BurrV (2003) Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.
ConnellRMesserschmidtJ (2005) Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society19(6): 829–859.
21.
DayRAllenT (2004) The relationship between career motivation and self-efficacy with protégé career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior64(1): 72–91.
22.
De PaterI (2005) Doing things right or doing the right thing: A new perspective on the gender gap in career success. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Kurt Lewin Institute, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
23.
De PaterIVan VianenABechtoldtM (2010) Gender differences in job challenge: A matter of task allocation. Gender, Work and Organization17(4): 433–453.
24.
DickP (2004) Discourse analysis. In: CassellCSymonG (eds), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: SAGE.
25.
DickPCassellC (2002) Barriers to managing diversity in a UK constabulary: The role of discourse. Journal of Management Studies39(7): 953–976.
26.
DickPHydeR (2006) Consent as resistance, resistance as consent: Re-reading part-time professionals’ acceptance of their marginal positions. Gender Work and Organization13(6): 543–564.
27.
DoorewaardHBenschopY (2003) HRM and organizational change: An emotional endeavor. Journal of Organizational Change Management16(3): 272–286.
28.
EaglyAKarauS (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109(3): 573–598.
29.
ElchardusMSmitsW (2008) The vanishing flexible: Ambition, self-realization and flexibility in the career perspectives of young Belgian adults. Work, Employment and Society22(2): 243–262.
30.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
FaircloughN (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Pearson.
32.
FaircloughNWodakR (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van DijkT (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE.
33.
FelsA (2008) Vrouwen en Ambitie: Nieuwe Keuzes, Hardnekkige Taboes [Women and Ambition: New Choices, Persistent Taboos]. Nieuwegein: Réunion.
34.
FletcherJ (1998) Relational practice – A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of Management Inquiry7(2): 163–186.
35.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
36.
GergenKJ (1999) An Invitation to Social Construction. London: SAGE.
37.
HakimC (2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
HallS (2001) Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In: WetherellMTaylorSYatesSJ (eds), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: SAGE, 72–81.
39.
HearnJ (2010) Reflecting on men and social policy: Contemporary critical debates and implications for social policy. Critical Social Policy30(2): 165–188.
40.
HearnJCollinsonD (2006) Men, masculinities and workplace diversity/diversion. In: KonradAPrasadPPringleJ (eds), Handbook of Workplace Diversity. London: SAGE.
41.
HeilmanMWallenAFuchsDTamkinsM (2004) Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 416–427.
42.
HolmesJ (2006) Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
43.
JudgeTCableDBoudreauJBretzR (1995) An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology48(3): 485–519.
44.
KaplanRDrathWKofodimosJ (1991) Beyond Ambition: How Driven Managers Can Lead Better and Live Better. San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
KarakowskyLElangovanA (2001) Risky decision making in mixed-gender teams: Whose risk tolerance matters?Small Group Research32(1): 94–111.
46.
KitzingerJ (1994) The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness16(1): 103–121.
47.
LarimerCHannaganRSmithK (2007) Balancing ambition and gender among decision makers. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science614(1): 56–73.
48.
LondonM (1983) Toward a theory of career motivation. Academy of Management Review8(4): 620–630.
49.
LondonM (1993) Career motivation of full- and part-time workers in mid and late career. International Journal of Career Management5(1): 21–29.
50.
MartinP (2003) ‘Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society17(4): 342–366.
51.
MerensAVan den BrakelMHartgersMHermansB (2011) Emancipatiemonitor 2010. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau en Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
52.
MescherS (2011) Ambiguities in work-life balance support.Unpublished doctoral thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
53.
MorganD (1996) Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology22: 129–152.
54.
MorganD (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
55.
MurphyW (2007) Individual and relational dynamics of ambition in careers. Dissertation Abstracts International68(3, suppl. A): 113.
56.
Nagy Hesse-BiberS (2007) Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
PanayiotouA (2010) ‘Macho’ managers and organizational heroes: Competing masculinities in popular films. Organization17(6): 659–683.
59.
PhelanJMoss-RacusinCRudmanL (2008) Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women Quarterly32(4): 406–413.
60.
PhillipsNHardyC (1997) Managing multiple identities: Discourse, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization4(2): 159–185.
61.
PortegijsW (2009) Deeltijd in Nederland in Hoofdlijnen. Factsheet Deeltijdarbeid [The Outlines of Part-Time Work in the Netherlands. Factsheet Part-Time Work]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
62.
RudmanLGlickP (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues57(4): 743–762.
63.
SearleJ (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
64.
SheridanA (2004) Chronic presenteeism: The multiple dimensions to men’s absence from part-time work. Gender Work and Organization11(2): 207–225.
65.
Smith-LovinLBrodyC (1989) Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review54(3): 424–435.
66.
SoolsAVan EngenMBaerveldtC (2007) Gendered career-making practices: On doing ambition or how managers discursively position themselves in a multinational corporation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology80(3): 413–435.
67.
Taskforce DeeltijdPlus (2010) De Discussie Voorbij. Eindrapport Taskforce DeeltijdPlus [Beyond the Discussion. Final Report Taskforce Part-Time Plus]. Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.
68.
TienariJQuackSTheobaldH (2002) Organizational reforms, ‘ideal workers’ and gender orders: A cross-societal comparison. Organization Studies23(2): 249–279.
69.
ValianV (1999) Why So Slow?The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70.
Van BeekAHendrikseWPouwelsBSchippersJ (2010) Werkende Vaders: Strategieen Voor Vaders Die Werk en Zorg Willen Combineren [Working Fathers: Strategies for Fathers Who Want to Combine Work and Care]. Zeist: Van Doorne Huiskes and Partners.
71.
Van den BrinkMBenschopY (2012) Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization19(4): 507–524.
72.
Van EngenMDikkersJVinkenburgCDe RooyE (2009) Career success of fathers and mothers: The impact of motherhood ideology, work-home culture, and work-home arrangements. Gedrag and Organisatie22(2): 146–171.
73.
VianenAKeizerW (1996) Gender differences in managerial intention. Gender, Work and Organization3(2): 103–114.
74.
WilkinsonS (1998) Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum21(1): 111–125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
