This article assesses the extent to which the foreign-controlled subsidiaries of multinational firms have the discretion to establish their employment relations policies. Drawing on a survey of the activities of foreign-controlled multinational companies in Canada, it considers three lines of analysis: the parent company’s country of origin, the subsidiary’s specific organizational capabilities and its position in global value chains. While our results confirm that US-controlled subsidiaries have lower discretion than those from continental Europe and Asia, they also highlight the need to go beyond country-of-origin analysis. Organizational capabilities and the subsidiary’s role in global value chains are also important predictors of subsidiary discretion on employment relations policy.
AlmondP (2011a) Re-visiting country of origin effects on HRM in multinational corporations. Human Resource Management Journal21(3): 258–271.
2.
AlmondP (2011b) The sub-national embeddedness of international HRM. Human Relations64(4): 531–551.
3.
AlmondPFernerA (eds) (2006) American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations across National Borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
ArthursHW (2000) The hollowing out of corporate Canada? In: JensonJde Sousa SantosB (eds) Globalizing Institutions. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 29–51.
5.
ArthursHW (2009) The hollowing out of corporate Canada: Implications for transnational labor law, policy and practice. Buffalo Law Review57(3): 781–801.
6.
BairJ (2008) Analysing economic organization: Embedded networks and global value chains compared. Economy and Society37(3): 339–364.
7.
Barner-RasmussenWBjörkmanI (2005) Surmounting interunit barriers: Factors associated with interunit communication intensity in the multinational corporation. International Studies of Management and Organization35(1): 28–46.
8.
BélangerJBerggrenCBjörkmanTKöhlerC (eds) (1999) Being Local Worldwide: ABB and the Challenge of Global Management. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
BirkinshawJ (1996) How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies27(3): 467–495.
10.
BirkinshawJ (2000) Network relationships inside and outside the firm, and the development of capabilities. In: BirkinshawJHagströmP (eds) The Flexible Firm: Capability Management in Network Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4–18.
11.
BjörkmanIBarner-RasmussenWLiL (2004) Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies35(5): 443–455.
12.
BoteroJCDjankovSLaPortaRLopez-de-SilanesFSchleiferA (2004) The regulation of labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics119(4): 1339–1382.
13.
BouquetCBirkinshawJ (2008) Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management34(3): 477–508.
14.
ChangSJvan WitteloostuijnAEdenL (2010) Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies41: 178–184.
15.
ChristophersonSClarkJ (2007) Power in firm networks: What it means for regional innovation systems. Regional Studies41(9): 1223–1236.
16.
CoeNMHessMYeungHWDickenPHendersenJ (2004) ‘Globalizing’ regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers29(4): 468–484.
17.
CoeNMDickenPHessM (2008) Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography8(3): 271–295.
18.
CollinsonDMorganG (eds) (2009) Images of the Multinational Firm. Chichester: Wiley.
19.
DörrenbächerCGammelgaardJ (2010) Multinational corporations, inter-organizational networks and subsidiary charter removals. Journal of World Business45(3): 206–216.
20.
DörrenbächerCGammelgaardJ (2011) Subsidiary power in multinational corporations: The subtle role of micro-political bargaining power. Critical Perspectives on International Business7(1): 30–47.
21.
DörrenbächerCGeppertM (2009) A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: Evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France. European Management Journal27(2): 100–112.
22.
DörrenbächerCGeppertM (eds) (2011) Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
EdwardsPBélangerJ (2009) The multinational firm as a contested terrain. In: CollinsonSMorganG (eds) Images of the Multinational Firm. Chichester: Wiley, 193–216.
24.
FarndaleEBrewsterCPoutsmaE (2008). Coordinated vs. liberal market HRM: The impact of institutionalization on multinational firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management19(11): 2004–2023.
25.
Fenton-O’CreevyMGooderhamPNordhaugO (2008) Human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia: Centralisation or autonomy?Journal of International Business Studies39(1): 151–166.
26.
Fenton-O’CreevyMGooderhamPCerdinJ-LRonningR (2011) Bridging roles, social skill and embedded knowing in multinational organizations. In: DörrenbächerCGeppertM (eds) Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–136.
27.
FernerA (1997) Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resource Management Journal7(1): 19–37.
28.
FernerAAlmondPClarkI. (2004) The dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources. Organization Studies25(3): 363–391.
29.
FernerATregaskisOEdwardsPEdwardsTMarginsonP (2011) HRM structures and subsidiary discretion in foreign multinationals in the UK. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(3): 483–509.
30.
Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (2011) Canada’s State of Trade: Trade and Investment Update – 2011. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
31.
GereffiG (2005) The global economy: Organization, governance, and development. In: SmelserNJSwedbergR (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd edn.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 160–182.
32.
GereffiGHumphreyJSturgeonT (2005) The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy12(1): 78–104.
33.
GooderhamPNordhaugORingdalK (2006) National embeddedness and calculative human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia. Human Relations59(11): 1491–1513.
34.
HallPAGingerichDW (2009) Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science39(3): 449–482.
35.
HallPASoskiceD (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
HerodARainnieAMcGrath-ChampS (2007) Working space: Why incorporating the geographical is central to theorizing work and employment practices. Work, Employment and Society21(2): 247–264.
37.
HerrigelGZeitlinJ (2010) Inter-firm relations in global manufacturing: Disintegrated production and its globalization. In: MorganGCampbellJLCrouchCPedersenOWhitleyR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 527–561.
38.
JacobyS (2005) The Embedded Corporation: Corporate Governance and Employment Relations in Japan and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
JohansonJPhalbergCThileniusP (1996) Conflict and control in MNC new product introduction. Journal of Market-Focused Management1(3): 249–265.
40.
KrahnHJLoweGSHughesKD (2011) Work, Industry, and Canadian Society, 6th edn.Toronto: Nelson.
41.
KristensenPHZeitlinJ (2005) Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferAVishnyRW (1998) Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy106(6): 1113–1155.
43.
LingYFloydSWBaldridgeDC (2005) Towards a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies36(6): 337–354.
44.
MeyerKEMudambiRNarulaR (2011) Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies48(2): 235–252.
45.
MorganG (2011) Reflections on the macro-politics of micro-politics. In: DörrenbächerCGeppertM (eds) Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 415–436.
46.
MorganGKristensenPH (2006) The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations59(11): 1467–1490.
47.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2007) Staying Competitive in the Global Economy: Moving Up the Value Chain. Paris: OECD.
48.
ParryEDickmannMMorleyM (2008) North American MNCs and their HR policies in liberal and coordinated market economies. International Journal of Human Resource Management19(11): 2024–2040.
49.
PilatDCimperAOlsenKWebbC (2006) The changing nature of manufacturing in OECD countries. STI Working Paper 2006/9, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
50.
PudelkoMHarzingAW (2007) Country-of-origin, localization, or dominance effect? An empirical investigation of HRM practices in foreign subsidiaries. Human Resource Management46(4): 535–559.
51.
RugmanAD’CruzJ (1993) The ‘Double Diamond’ model of international competitiveness: The Canadian experience. Management International Review33(2): 17–39.
52.
RugmanAOhCH (2012) Why the home region matters: Location and regional multinationals. British Journal of Management: 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00817.x (accessed 26 June 2012).
53.
RugmanAVerbekeA (2005) Towards a theory of regional multinationals: A transaction cost economics approach. Management International Review45(1): 5–17.
54.
RugmanAVerbekeAYuanW (2011) Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal’s classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management Studies48(2): 253–277.
55.
RutherfordTHolmesJ (2008) ‘The flea on the tail of the dog’: Power in global production networks and the restructuring of Canadian automotive clusters. Journal of Economic Geography8(4): 519–544.
56.
RutherfordTHolmesJ (2012) (Small) differences that (still) matter? Cross-border regions and work place governance in the Southern Ontario and US Great Lakes automotive industry. Regional Studies: 1–12 (accessed 26 June 2012).
57.
SmithC (2005) Beyond convergence and divergence: Explaining variations in organizational practices and forms. In: AckroydSBattRThompsonPTolbertPS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 602–625.
58.
SmithCMeiksinsP (1995) System, society and dominance effects in cross-national organisational analysis. Work, Employment and Society9(2): 241–267.
59.
SturgeonTVan BiesebroeckJGereffiG (2008) Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automobile industry. Journal of Economic Geography8(3): 297–321.
60.
SweeneyBA (2010) Comparing employment relations in a cross-border region: The case of Cascadia’s forest products industry. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, 377 pp.
World Bank (2012) Doing Business in a More Transparent World. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
64.
World Economic Forum (2011) The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
65.
ZhangYRajagopalanN (2004) When the known devil is better than an unknown God: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Academy of Management Journal47(4): 483–500.
