We examine how call-center employees draw on opposed discourses to understand the purpose and consequences of performance measurement as workplace surveillance. Sometimes the workers saw performance measurement as a legitimate and impartial managerial tool serving the interests of everyone in the organization (e.g. by exposing free-riding, etc.). Other times, they saw performance measurement as intrusive and oppressive; imposed on them by managers who, as agents of employers, used it to serve a narrow set of interests (e.g. by intensifying work, etc.). Our analysis depicts how employees used an ironical process of predicate logic to develop flexible meaning-making strategies to cope with the apparent conflicts in meaning that arose from the two opposed discourses. We conclude by developing a three step method for the practical analysis of such ironical situations of competing discourses that facilitates our ability to reconsider and reconfigure meaning in more useful ways.
AilloJR (1993) Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology23(7): 499–507.
2.
AlgeBJ (2001) Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology86(4): 797–804.
3.
AlgeBJGreenbergJBrinsfieldCT (2006) An identity-based model of organizational monitoring: Integrating information, privacy, and organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management25: 71–135.
4.
BallK (2010) Workplace Surveillance: An overview. Labor History51(1): 87–106.
5.
BarkerJR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 408–437.
6.
BarkerJR (1999) The Discipline of Teamwork. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
7.
BarkerJRCheneyG (1994) The concept and the practices of discipline in contemporary organizational life. Communication Monographs61(1): 19–43.
8.
BeltVRichardsonRWebsterJ (2002) Women, social skill and interactive service work in telephone call centers. New Technology, Work and Employment17(1): 20–34.
9.
BensonJK (1977) Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly22(1): 1–21.
10.
BogardW (1996) The Simulation of Surveillance: Hypercontrol in Telematic Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BrownRH (1983) Dialectical irony. Literary form and sociological theory. Poetics Today4(3): 543–564.
12.
BrymanA (1989) Research Methods and Organization Studies. London: Unwin Hyman.
13.
CallaghanGThompsonP (2002) We recruit attitude: The selection and shaping of routine call center labour. Journal of Management Studies39(2): 233–254.
14.
CarlsonGN (1977) A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy1(3): 413–458.
15.
Collin-JacquesCSmithC (2005) Nursing on the line: Experience from England and Quebec (Canada). Human Relations58(1): 5–32.
16.
EsterbergKG (2002) Qualitative Methods in Social Research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
17.
FernieSMetcalfD (1999) (Not) hanging on the telephone: Payment systems in the new sweatshops. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations9: 23–68.
18.
FlemingP (2005) ‘Kindergarten cop’: Paternalism and resistance in a high-commitment workplace. Journal of Management Studies42(7): 1469–1489.
19.
FlemingPSewellG (2002) Looking for the Good Soldier Švejk: Alternative modalities of resistance in the contemporary workplace. Sociology36(4): 857–873.
20.
FosterWMWiebeE (2010) Praxis makes perfect: Recovering the ethical promise of Critical Management Studies. Journal of Business Ethics94(2): 271–283.
21.
FoucaultM (2000) Truth and juridical forms. In: FaubionJD (ed.) Michel Foucault: The Essential Works, vol. 3. New York: The New Press, 1–88.
22.
GarsonB (1988) The Electronic Sweatshop: How Computers are Transforming the Office of the Future into the Factory of the Past. New York: Simon and Schuster.
23.
GlucksmannMA (2004) Call configurations: varieties of call center and divisions of labor. Work, Employment and Society18(4): 795–811.
24.
GouldnerA (1955) Metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy. American Political Science Review49(2): 496–507.
25.
HackingI (1999) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
HallS (2001) The spectacle of the other. In: WetherellMTaylorSYatesSJ (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: SAGE, 324–344.
27.
HoyleEWallaceM (2008) Two faces of organizational irony: Endemic and pragmatic. Organization Studies29(11): 1427–1447.
28.
HuselidMA (1995) The impact of human-resource management-practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal38(3): 635–672.
29.
JayM (1994) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
JermierJ (1988) Sabotage at work: The rational view. Research in the Sociology of Organizations6: 101–134.
31.
KauferDS (1983) Irony, interpretive form, and the theory of meaning. Poetics Today4(3): 451–464.
32.
KrugerJDunningD (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(6): 1121–1134.
33.
LandesDS (1986) What do bosses really do?Journal of Economic History46(3): 585–623.
34.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
35.
LyonD (2001) Facing the future: Seeking ethics for everyday surveillance. Ethics and Information Technology3(3): 171–181.
36.
MarcuseH (1964) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
37.
MarglinSA (1996) What do bosses do? In: LippitVD (ed.) Radical Political Economy: Explorations in Alternative Economic Analysis. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, 60–112.
38.
MarxGT (1999) Measuring everything that moves: The New Surveillance at work. Research in the Sociology of Work8: 165–189.
39.
MarxGT (2001) Murky conceptual waters: The public and the private. Ethics and Information Technology3(3): 157–169.
40.
McKerrowRE (1989) Critical rhetoric: Theory and practice. Communication Monographs56: 91–111.
41.
MillerSWeckertJ (2000) Privacy, the workplace and the internet. Journal of Business Ethics28(3): 255–265.
42.
MoormanRH (2003) Can electronic performance monitoring be fair? Exploring relationships among monitoring characteristics, perceived fairness, and job performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies10(2): 2–16.
43.
MueckeD (1969) The Compass of Irony. London: Methuen.
NebekerDMTatumBC (1993) The effects of computer monitoring, standards, and rewards on work performance, job-satisfaction, and stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology23(7): 508–536
46.
NussbaumMC (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
PosterM (1990) The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
49.
ReynoldsMVinceR (2004) Critical management education and action-based learning: Synergies and contradictions. Academy of Management Learning and Education3(4): 442–456.
50.
RoseEWrightG (2005) Satisfaction and dimensions of control among call center customer service representatives. International Journal of Human Resource Management16(1): 136–160.
51.
RothschildJWhittJA (1986) The Cooperative Workplace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
RyanRMDeciEL (2001) On happiness and human potential: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology52: 141–166.
53.
RynesSLCobertAEBrownKG (2002) HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management41(2): 149–174.
54.
SeoM-GCreedWED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review27(2): 222–247.
55.
SewellG (1998) The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly43(2): 397–429.
56.
SewellGBarkerJR (2001) Neither good, nor bad, but dangerous: Surveillance as an ethical paradox. Ethics and Information Technology3(3): 183–196.
57.
SewellGBarkerJR (2006) Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Academy of Management Review31(4): 934–961.
58.
StantonJMJulianAL (2002) The impact of social cues about an EPM system on performance quality and quantity. Computers in Human Behavior18(1): 85–101.
59.
TownsendK (2005) Electronic surveillance and cohesive teams: Room for resistance in an Australian call center?New Technology, Work and Employment20(1): 47–59.
60.
Van den BroekDCallaghanGThompsonP (2004) Teams without teamwork? Explaining the call center paradox. Economic and Industrial Democracy25(2): 197–218.
61.
WatermanAS (1993) Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64(4): 678–691.
62.
WeickKE (1985) Systematic observational methods. In: LindzeyGAronsonE (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Random House, 567–634.
63.
WelbourneTM (2007) Editor-in-Chief’s note: The HRM paradox. Human Resource Management46(4): 467–469.
64.
WhiteH (1978) Introduction: Tropology, discourse, and the modes of human consciousness. In: WhiteH, Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65.
WrightEO (2000) Working-class power, capitalist class interests, and class compromise. American Journal of Sociology105(4): 957–1002.
66.
WrightE (1978) Sociology and the irony model. Sociology12(3): 523–543.
67.
ZuboffS (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine. New York: Basic Books.
68.
ZweigDWebsterJ (2002) Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior23(5): 605–633.
