How are organizational discourses enacted by people at work? In this article, instead of treating subjects as somewhat distinct from such discourses, I argue that the two are inescapably intertwined. The concept of ‘ek-stasis’ helps us to understand this. Ekstasis invokes an idea of the ‘self ’ that, through processes of identification, is always located outside of itself, embedded in a wider sociality. I explore this dynamic through an in-depth study of the powerful discourse of ‘ethical living’, and its enactment in one contemporary development sector organization, EWH. This ek-static enactment was somewhat ambivalent: involving mutual recognition between colleagues, but also processes of exclusion and policing. I highlight how attention to feeling and passion was important in understanding the relation between workplace discourse and identification processes, in this setting. This study shows that a view of workplace selves as ek-static is useful for understanding the enactment of discourse at work, and that this enactment can be both passionate and ambivalent.
Alexander J., Smith P. ( 1993) The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Theory and Society22(2): 151-207.
2.
Alvesson M., Karreman D. ( 2000) Varieties of discourse: on the study of organisations through discourse analysis. Human Relations53(9): 1125-1149.
3.
Alvesson M., Willmott H. ( 2002) Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies39(5): 619-644.
4.
Barley S., Kunda G. ( 1992) Design and devotion: surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly37(3): 363-399.
5.
Borgerson J. ( 2005) JudithButler: on organizing subjectivities. Sociological Review 53(Oct.): 63-79.
6.
Butler J. ( 1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity . London: Routledge.
7.
Butler J. ( 1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ . London: Routledge.
8.
Butler J. ( 1997) The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. London: Routledge.
9.
Butler J. ( 2004) Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
10.
Davis M. ( 1971) That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences1(2): 309-344.
11.
Dick P., Cassell C. ( 2002) Barriers to managing diversity in a UK constabulary: The role of discourse. Journal of Management Studies39(7): 953-976.
12.
Eisenhardt KM ( 1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(1): 532-550.
13.
Ford J., Harding N. ( 2004) We went looking for an Organisation but could find only the Metaphysics of its Presence. Sociology38(4): 815-830.
14.
Foucault M. ( 1981) The order of discourse. In: Young R (ed.) Untying the Text. London: Kegan Paul, 48-78.
15.
Foucault M. ( 1982) The subject and power. In: Dreyfus H and Rabinow P (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 208-228.
16.
Geertz C. ( 1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Grant D., Keenoy T., and Oswick C. ( 1998) Organizational discourse: Of diversity, dichotomy and multi-disciplinarity. In: Grant D, Keenoy T, and Oswick C (eds) Discourse and Organization, London: SAGE, 1-14.
18.
Grey C. ( 1994) Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline . Sociology28(2): 479-497.
19.
Hancock P., Tyler M. ( 2001) Managing subjectivity and the dialectic of self-consciousness: Hegel and organization theory. Organization8(4): 565-586.
20.
Halford S., Leonard P. ( 2005) Place, space and time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities . Organization Studies27(5): 657-676.
21.
Hall S. ( 2000) Who needs identity? In: Du Gay P, Evans J, and Redman P (eds) Identity: A Reader. London: SAGE, 15-30.
22.
Harding N. ( 2003) The Social Construction of Management. London: Routledge.
23.
Hodgson D. ( 2005) Putting on a professional performance: Performativity, subversion and project management. Organization12(1): 51-68.
24.
Honneth A. ( 1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
25.
Jones C., Spicer A. ( 2005) Disidentifying the subject: Lacanian comments on subjectivity, resistance and enterprise. Organization12(2): 223-246.
26.
Karreman D., Alvesson M. ( 2004) Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization11(1): 149-175.
27.
Knights D., Vurdubakis T. ( 1994) Foucault, power, resistance and all that. In: Jermier J, Knights D, and Nord W (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations. Routledge: London, 167-198.
28.
Knights D., Willmott H. ( 1989) Power and subjectivity at work: from degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology23(4): 535-558.
29.
Kondo D. ( 1990) Crafting Selves: Power, Gender and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Kunda G. ( 1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
Lloyd, M. ( 1998) Politics and melancholia. Women’s Philosophy Review20: 25-43.
32.
Lutz C. ( 1988) Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Maitlis S., Ozcelik H. ( 2004) Toxic decision processes: A study of emotion in organizational decision making. Organization Science15(4): 375-393.
34.
Marshak R., Keenoy T., Oswick C., and Grant D. ( 2000) From outer worlds to inner worlds. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science36(2): 245-258.
35.
McNay L. ( 2003) Agency, anticipation and indeterminacy in feminist theory . Feminist Theory4(2): 139-148.
36.
Pratt M. ( 2000) The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: managing identification among amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly45(3): 456-493.
37.
Roberts J. ( 2005) The power of the ‘imaginary’ in disciplinary processes. Organization12(5): 619-642.
38.
Said E. ( 1978) Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
39.
Schultze U. ( 2000) A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly24(1): 1-39.
40.
Strauss A., Corbin J. ( 1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: SAGE.
41.
Symon G. ( 2005) Exploring resistance from a rhetorical perspective. Organization Studies. 26(11): 1641-1663.
42.
Taylor C. ( 1994) The politics of recognition. In: Gutman A (ed.) Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition . Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 25-74.
43.
Walsham G. ( 1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method . European Journal of Information Systems4(2): 74-81.
44.
Wray-Bliss E. ( 2003) Research subjects/research subjections: the politics and ethics of critical research. Organization10(2): 307-325.
