This study advances our understanding of why and how the performance of standardized safety routines varies. Based on six months of field research and interviews in a molecular biology laboratory, this study examines the divergence of safety regulations and actual routine performance. It identifies distinct routine components that address different aspects of safety. While safety regulations and training aim at preventing adverse effects of hazardous substances on the scientists, the scientists are concerned about potential contamination of their experiments. This study investigates the relationship between organizational and scientific objectives. It argues that organizational objectives fall behind scientific objectives in safety routine performance to the extent that their pursuit requires a set of actions separate from those actions that suffice to meet the scientists’ professional concern.
Ashforth, B.E. & Fried, Y.The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations , 1988, 41, 305-29.
2.
Barley, S.R.Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41, 404-41.
3.
Barley, S.R. & Bechky, B.A.In the backrooms of science: The work of technicians in science labs. Work and Occupations, 1994, 21, 85-126.
4.
Becker, M.C.Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004, 13, 643-77.
5.
Cohen, M.D. & Bacdayan, P.Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 1994, 5, 554-68.
6.
Cohen, W.M., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M. & Winter, S.G.Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1996, 5, 653-98.
7.
Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963.
8.
Feldman, M.S.Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 2000, 11, 611-29.
9.
Feldman, M.S.A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines . Industrial and Corporate Change, 2003, 12, 727-52.
10.
Feldman, M.S. & Pentland, B.T.Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change . Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48, 94-118.
11.
Feldman, M.S. & Rafaeli, A.Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 2002, 39, 309-31.
12.
Fujimura, J.H.Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation’ . In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 168-211.
13.
Gersick, C.J.G. & Hackman, J.R.Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990, 47, 65-97.
14.
Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D.To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 2000, 7, 329-48.
15.
Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D.Learning the trade. A culture of safety in practice. Organization , 2002, 9, 191-223.
16.
Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. & Odella, F.What do you mean by safety? Conflicting perspectives on accident causation and safety management in a construction firm. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1998, 6, 202-13.
17.
Gray, G.C.The regulation of corporate violations. British Journal of Criminology, 2006, 46, 875-92.
18.
Guldenmund, F.W.The use of questionnaires in safety culture research - An evaluation. Safety Science, 2007, 45, 723-43.
19.
Howard-Grenville, J.A.The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 2005, 16, 618-36.
20.
Kleinman, D.L.Untangling context: Understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world. Science Technology & Human Values, 1998, 23, 285-314.
21.
Knorr-Cetina, K.The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
22.
Knorr-Cetina, K.The couch, the cathedral, and the laboratory: On the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 113-38.
23.
Langer, E.J.Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1989, pp. 137-73.
24.
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.
25.
Lynch, M.E.Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science, 1988, 18, 265-89.
26.
March, J.G.Understanding how decisions happen in organizations. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 9-32.
27.
March, J.G. & Simon, H.A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
28.
Mody, C.A little dirt never hurt anyone: Knowledge-making and contamination in materials science. Social Studies of Science, 2001, 31, 7-36.
29.
Narduzzo, A.E., Rocco, M. & Warglien, M.Talking about routines in the field. In G. Dosi, R. Nelson & S.G. Winter (Eds), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 27-50.
30.
Nelson, R. & Winter, S.G.An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston, MA: Belknap Press, 1982.
31.
Orr, J.Talking about machines. An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press, 1996.
32.
Owen-Smith, J.Managing laboratory work through skepticism: Processes of evaluation and control . American Sociological Review, 2001, 66, 427-52.
33.
Pentland, B.T.Organizing moves in software-support hot lines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37, 527-48.
Pentland, B.T.Sequential variety in work processes. Organization Science , 2003, 14, 528-40.
36.
Pentland, B.T. & Feldman, M.S.Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005, 14, 793-815.
37.
Pentland, B.T. & Rueter, H.H.Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39, 484-510.
38.
Reynaud, B.The void at the heart of rules: Routines in the context of rule-following . The case of the Paris Metro Workshop. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005, 14, 847-71.
39.
Sims, B.Safe science: Material and social order in laboratory work. Social Studies of Science, 2005, 35, 333-66.
40.
Stinchcombe, A.L.Information and organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
41.
Thompson, J.D.Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
42.
Turner, B.A.The development of a safety culture. Chemistry & Industry , 1991, 7, 241-3.
43.
Turner, B.A.The sociology of safety. In D. Blockley (Ed.), Engineering safety. London: McGraw-Hill , 1992, pp. 186-201.
44.
Turner, B.A.Patterns of crisis behavior: A qualitative inquiry. In A. Bryman & B. Burgess (Eds), Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 195-215.
45.
Weick, K.E. & Sutcliffe, K.M.Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 2006, 17, 514-24.
46.
Winter, S.G.Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines, and replication. In C.A. Montgomery (Ed.), Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, 1995 , pp. 147-78.
