Information and communication technologies play a key role in contemporary organizations. Supported by a longitudinal study of changes in purchasing practices, owing to the implementation of an e-business system at a large, global corporation, this article shows the interplay between the technology and the role of the users. We argue that the introduction of the e-business system increased the hierarchy and bureaucracy but also that the purchasers' professional identities and established work procedures were threatened by the technology being used. The results indicate how a technological artifact is by no means detached from the broader reformulating of managerial procedures and practices, instead reflecting and embodying some of the managerial virtues of predictability and hierarchy. Since technology is playing an increasingly key role in most industries and domains, it is also suggested that the intersection between technology and professions be examined in more detail.
Abbott, A.The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
2.
Ackroyd, S.Organization contra organizations: Professionals and organizational change in the United Kingdom. Organization Studies, 1996, 17, 599-621.
3.
Adler, P.New technologies, new skills. California Management Review , 1986, XXIX, 9-28.
4.
Barley, S.R.Technology as an occasion of structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 78-108.
5.
Barley, S.R.The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35, 61-103.
6.
Bechky, A.Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction . American Journal of Sociology, 2003, 109, 720-52.
7.
Becker, H.S., Geer, B., Highes, E.C. & Strauss, A.L.Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1961.
8.
Bertolotti, F., Macrì, D.M. & Tagliaventi, M.R.Social and organisational implications of CAD usage: A grounded theory in a fashion company. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2004, 19, 110-27.
9.
Bijker, W.E.Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995.
10.
Bijker, W.E. & Law, J.Shaping society/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992 .
11.
Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, T.J. (Eds). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987.
12.
Blauner, R.Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1964.
13.
Blomgren, M.The drive for transparency: organizational field transformations in Swedish healthcare. Public Administration, 2007, 85, 67-82.
14.
Boland, R.J., Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y.Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representation in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 2007, 18, 631-47.
15.
Bolton, S.C.A simple matter of control? NHS hospital nurses and new management. Journal of Management Studies, 2004, 41, 317-33.
16.
Burri, R.V.Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science, 2008, 38, 35-62.
17.
Burris, B.Computerization of the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology , 1998, 24, 141-57.
Cowan, R.S.More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
20.
Czarniawska, B.Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Malmö: Liber, 2007.
21.
Engesmo, J. & Tjora, A.H.Documenting for whom? A symbolic interactionist analysis of technologically induced changes of nursing handovers. New Technology, Work and Organization, 2006, 21, 176-89.
22.
Freidson, E.Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge . Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.
23.
Gitelman, L.Scripts, grooves, and writing machines. Representing technology in the Edison era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.
24.
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1967.
25.
Grint, K. & Woolgar, S.The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.
26.
Halpern, S.A.Dynamics of professional control: Internal coalitions and crossprofessional boundaries. American Journal of Sociology, 1992, 97, 994-1021.
27.
Heidegger, M.The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper and Row, 1977.
28.
Howcroft, D.After the goldrush: Deconstructing the myths of the dot.com market. Journal of Information Technology, 2001, 16, 195-204.
29.
Johnson, E.Surgical simulations and simulated surgeons: Reconstituting medical practices and practitioners in simulations. Social Studies of Science , 2007, 37, 585-608.
30.
Kalling, T., Fazekas, L. & Tobisson, M.`It's all e-biz, kids.' A quantitative study of Swedish executives' view on e-business between 1997 and 2001. In J. Hedman , T. Kalling, D. Khakhar & O. Steen (Eds), Lund on informatics. Malmö: Liber, 2005.
31.
Kallinikos, J.Deconstructing information packages. Organizational and behavioural implications of ERP systems. Information, Technology & People, 2004, 17, 8-30.
32.
Kallinikos, J.The order of technology: Complexity and control in a connected world. Information and Organization, 2005, 185-202.
33.
Kallinikos, J.Farewell to constructivism. Technology and context-embedded action. In C. Avgerou, C. Ciborra & F. Land (Eds), The social study of information and communication technology: Innovations, actors, and contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 140-61.
34.
Knox, H., O'Doherty, D., Vurdubakis, T. & Westrup, C.Rites of passage: Organization as an excess of flows. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2007, 23, 265-84.
35.
Kosmala, K. & Herrbach, O.The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms. Human Relations, 2006, 59, 1393-428.
36.
Kostera, M.Organisational ethnography: Methods and inspirations. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2007.
37.
Lamont, M. & Molnár, V.The study of boundaries in social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 2002, 28, 167-95.
38.
Larson, M.S.The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.
39.
Law, J.Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.
40.
Law, J. & Singleton, V.Object lessons. Organization, 2005, 12, 331-55.
41.
Leonardi, P.M. & Barley, S.R.Materiality and change: Challenges to building theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 2008, 18, 159-76.
42.
Mackenzie, A.Problematizing the technological: The object as event? Social Epistemology, 2005, 19, 381-99.
43.
March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P.The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 1975, 3, 147-71.
44.
Martin, P.Y. & Turner, B.A.Grounded theory and organizational research. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 1986, 22, 141-57.
45.
May, C., Gask, L., Atkinson, T., Ellis, N., Mair, F. & Esmail, A.Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: The case of telepsychiatry. Social Science & Medicine, 2001, 52, 1889-901.
46.
McGivern, G. & Ferlie, E.Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal. Human Relations, 2007, 60, 1361-85.
47.
Mclaughlin, J. & Webster, A.Rationalising knowledge: IT systems, professional identities and power. The Sociological Review, 1998, 46, 781-802.
48.
Nye, D.E. Technology matters: Questions to live with. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006.
49.
Orlikowski, W.J.The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations . Organization Science, 1992, 3, 398-427.
50.
Orlikowski, W.J.Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective . Information Systems Research, 1996, 7, 63-92.
Orlikowski, W.J. & Iacono, C.S.Research commentary: Desperately seeking the `IT' in IT research - A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research , 2001, 12, 121-34.
53.
Oudshoorn, N. & Pinch, T. (Eds). How users matter. The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003.
54.
Pentland, B.T. & Feldman, M.S.Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organization Science, 2007, 18, 781-95.
55.
Poster, M.Information please: Culture and politics in the age of digital machines. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.
56.
Prasad, P.Symbolic process in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36, 1400-29.
57.
Ross, A. & Chiasson, M.W.A call to (dis)order: An ethnomethodological study of information technology `disruptions' in the courtroom. Information and Organization, 2005, 15, 203-27.
58.
Schatzki, T.R.Introduction: Practice theory. In T.R. Schatzki , K. Knorr-Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge , 2001, pp. 42-55.
59.
Schleef, D.J.Managing elites: Professional socialization in law and business schools. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
60.
Scott, W.R.Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 2008, 29, 219-38.
61.
Slack, J.D. & Wise, J.M.Cultural studies and technology. In L.A. Lievrouw & S. Living-stone (Eds), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICT. London: SAGE, 2002, pp. 485-501.
62.
Spicer, A.The political process of inscribing a new technology. Human Relations, 2005, 58, 867-90.
63.
Strauss, A., Schatzman, L., Bucher, R., Ehrlich, D. & Sabshin, M.Psychiatric ideologies and institutions. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1964.
64.
Van Maanen,J. , Tales from the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.
65.
Williams, R. & Edge, D.The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 1996, 25, 865-99.
66.
Wise, J.M.Exploring technology and social space. Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE, 1997.
67.
Woodward, J.Business organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.
68.
Woolgar, S.Configuring the user. The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge , 1991, pp. 58-99.
69.
Yang, S., Chatterjee, S. & Chen, C.Wireless communications: Myths and reality. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2004, 13, 682-96.
70.
Yates, J.Control through communication. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
71.
Yates, J.How business enterprises use technology: Extending the demand-side turn. Enterprise & Society, 2006, 7, 422-55.
72.
Yeow, A. & Sia, S.K.Negotiating `best practices' in package software implementation. Information and Organization, 2008, 18, 1-28.
73.
Zammuto, R.F., Griffith, T.L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D.J. & Faraj, S.Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 2007, 19, 749-62.
