Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2007-11
Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions
Telework and other forms of virtual work have experienced dramatic growth over the last decade. While research is beginning to understand its impacts on teleworkers themselves, studies to date have not looked at its effect on those who remain in the office. This study therefore shifts the focus to non-teleworkers in offices where telework is present, to investigate if the prevalence of teleworkers in an office impacts the work outcomes of non-teleworkers. Using a sample of 240 professional employees, results suggest teleworker prevalence is negatively associated with co-worker satisfaction, and that this relationship is influenced by the amount of time co-workers telework, the extent of face-to-face interactions, and job autonomy. Moreover, a non-teleworker's satisfaction with co-workers was also found to be negatively associated with turnover intentions. Together, results suggest the need to consider the full range of telework's impacts including the potential adverse consequences for non-teleworkers.
Aiken, L.S. & West, S.G.Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
2.
Allen, D.G. & Renn, R.W.The impact of telecommuting design on social systems, self-regulation, and role boundaries. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Mangaement, 2003, 22, 125—63.
3.
Andres, H.P.A comparison of face-to-face and virtual software development teams. Team PerformanceManagement, 2002, 8, 39—48.
4.
Bailey, D.E. & Kurland, N.B.A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23, 383—400.
5.
Baltes, B.B., Briggs, T.E., Huff, J.W., Wright, J.A. & Neuman, G.A.Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84(4), 496—513.
6.
Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A.The moderator—mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 1173—82.
7.
Baruch, Y. Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2000, 15, 34—49.
8.
Baumeister, R. & Leary, M.R.The need to belong, desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivatin. PsychologialBulletin, 1995 , 117(3), 497—529.
9.
Bednarz, A.Inside AT&T's telwork program. Network World, 28 November 2005.
10.
Belanger, F.Workers' propensity to telecommute: An empirical study. Information and Management, 1999, 35, 139—53.
11.
Bobko, P. & Stone-Romero, E.F.Meta-analysis may be another useful research tool, but it is not a panacea. In G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources manaagement . Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 1998, 16, pp. 359—97.
12.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics.Omnibus household survey results (August). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2003.
13.
Burgoon, J.K., Bonito, J.A., Ramirez, A. Jr, Dunbar, N.E., Kam, K. & Fischer, J.Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 2002, 52, 657—77.
14.
Burt, R.S.Attachment, decay, and social network. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001, 22, 619—43.
15.
Caldwell, B.S.Sociotechnical factors affecting communication and isolation in complex environments . In M. Mouloua & J.J. Koonce (Eds), Human-automation interactions: Resarch and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1997, pp. 298—304.
16.
Chapman, A.J., Sheehy, N.P., Heywood, S., Dooley, B. & Collins, S.C.The organizational implications of teleworking. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1995, 10, 229—48.
17.
Clugston, M.The mediating effects of multidimensional commitment on job satisfaction and intent to leave. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2000, 21, 477—86.
18.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G. & Aiken, L.S.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 3rd edn. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.
19.
Cooper, C. & Kurland, N.B.Telecommuting, professional isolation and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 2002, 23, 511—32.
20.
Cotton, J.L. & Tuttle, J.M.Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research . Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11, 55—70.
21.
Cramton, C.D.The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration . Organization Science, 2001, 12, 346—71.
22.
Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H.Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design . Management Science, 1986, 32, 554—71.
23.
Dawis, R.V., England, G.W. & Lofquist, L.H.A theory of work adjustment, rev. edn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 1968, XXIII, Bulletin 47.
24.
Donovan, M.A., Drasgow, F. & Probst, T.M.Does computerizing pencil-and-paper job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight. Journal of Applied Psychology , 2000, 85, 305—13.
25.
Doty, D.H. & Glick, W.H.Common method bias: Does common method variance really bias results?Organizational Research Methods, 1998, 1(4), 374—406.
26.
Ducharme, L.J. & Martin, J.K.Unrewarding work, co-worker support, and job satisfaction. Work and Occupations, 2000, 27, 223—43.
27.
Duxbury, L. & Neufeld, D.An empirical evaluation of the impacts of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication. Journal of Engineering and TechnologyManagement , 1999, 16, 1—28.
28.
Duxbury, L.E., Higgins, C.A. & Neufeld, D.Telework and the balance between work and family: Is telework part of the problem or part of the solution? In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds), The virtual workplace. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 1998, pp. 218—55.
29.
Feldman, D.C. & Gainey, T.W.Patterns of telecommuting and their consequences: Framing the research agenda . Human Resource Managment Review, 1997, 7, 369—88.
30.
Festinger, L., Shachter, S. & Back, K.Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper, 1950.
31.
Fried, Y.Meta-analytic comparison of the Job Diagnostic Survey and Job Characteristics Inventory as correlates of work satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 690—7.
32.
Furnas, A.Dealing with co-worker jealousy. Working at home, April 2000, available online at: [http://www.balancedlifedesign.com ].
33.
Golden, T.D.Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2006a, 69, 176—87.
34.
Golden, T.D.The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. TheJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2006b, 27, 319—40.
35.
Golden, T.D. & Veiga, J.F.The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 2005, 31, 301—18.
36.
Golden, T.D., Veiga, J.F. & Simsek, Z.Telecommuting's differential impact on work—family conflict: Is there no place like home?Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91, 1340—50.
37.
Gordon, G.Co-workers and clients frequently asked questions. Gil Gordon Associates, 2005, available online at: [http://www.gilgordon.com/telecommuting/].
38.
Green, S.G. & Taber, T.D.The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Peformance, 1980 , 25, 97—106.
39.
Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P.W. & Gaertner, S.A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 2000, 26, 463—88.
40.
Guimaraes, T. & Dallow, P.Empirically testing the benefits, problems, and success factors for telecommuting programmes. EuropeanJournal of Information Systems, 1999, 8, 40—54.
41.
Gupta, Y.P., Karimi, J. & Somers, T.M. Telecommuting : Problems associated with communications technologies and their capabilities. IEEE Transactions on EngineeringManagement, 1995, 42, 305—18.
42.
Guzzo, R.A. & Shea, G.P.Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology , 2nd edn, vol. 3. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992, pp. 269—313.
43.
Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R.Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159—70.
Harrington, S.J. & Ruppel, C.P. Telecommuting : A test of trust, competing values, and relative advantage. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication , 1999, 42, 223—39.
Hill, E.J., Miller, B.C., Weiner, S.P. & Colihan, J.Influences of the virtual office on aspsects of work and work/life balance . Personnel Psychology, 1998, 51, 667—83.
48.
Hinds, P.J. & Mortensen, M.Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication . Organization Science, 2005, 16, 290—307.
49.
Hitlan, R.T., Cliffton, R.J. & DeSoto, M.C. Perceived exclusion in the workplace: The moderating effects of gender on work-related attitudes and psychological health. NorthAmerican Journal of Psychology, 2006, 8, 217—36.
50.
Igbaria, M. & Guimaraes, T.Exploring differences in employee turnover intentions and its determinants among telecommuters and non-telecommuters. Journal of Management InformationSystems, 1999, 6(1), 147—64.
51.
Jehn, K.A. & Mannix, E.A.The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intra-group conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44, 238—51.
52.
Kahn, W.A.Relational systems at work. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1998, pp. 39—76.
53.
Kiesler, S. & Cummings, J.N.What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In P.J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds), Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002, pp. 57—80.
54.
Kiggundu, M.N.Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 31, 145—72.
55.
Kohler, S.S. & Mathieu, J.E.Individual characteristics, work perceptions, and affective reactions influences on differentiated absence criteria. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993, 14, 515—30.
56.
Kossek, E.E., Lautsch, B.A. & Eaton, S.C. Telecommuting , control, and boundary management : Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work—family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2006, 68, 347—67.
57.
Kugelmass, J. Telecommuting: A manager's guide to flexible work arrangements. New York : Lexington Books, 1995.
58.
Kurland, N.B. & Egan, R.D. Telecommuting : Justice and control in the virtual organization . Organization Science, 1999, 10, 500—13.
59.
Langfred, C.W.The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2000 , 21, 563—85.
60.
Leenders, R.T.A.J., van Engelen, J.M.L. & Kratzer, J.Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management , 2003, 20, 69—92.
61.
Liao, H., Joshi, A. & Chaung, A.Sticking out like a sore thumb: Employee dissimilarity and deviance at work . Personnel Psychology, 2004, 57, 969—1000.
62.
Maertz, C.P. & Griffeth, R.W.Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications. Journal of Management , 2004, 30, 667—83.
63.
Makinen, A., Kivimaki, M., Elovanio, M., Virtanen, M. & Bond, S.Organization of nursing care as a determinant of job satisfaction among hospital nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 2003 , 11, 299—305.
64.
Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E. & Zaccaro, S.J.A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26, 356—76.
65.
McCloskey, D.W. & Igbaria, M.A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research. In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds), The virtual workplace. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 1998, pp. 338—58.
66.
Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C., Lee, T.W., Syblynski, C.J. & Erez, M.Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44, 1102—21.
67.
Mossholder, K.W., Settoon, R.P. & Henagan, S.C.A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48, 607—18.
68.
Nilles, J.M.Making telecommuting happen: A guide for telemanagers and telecommuters. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994.
69.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H.The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
70.
Norman, P., Collins, S., Conner, M., Martin, R. & Rance, J. Attributions , cognitions, and copying styles: Teleworkers' reactions to work-related problems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1995, 25(2), 117—28.
71.
Office of National Statistics.Labor market trends (October 2005), available online at: [ http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp?vlnk=550], 27 September 2006.
72.
Pierce, J.L. & Newstrom, J.W.Toward a conceptual clarification of employee responses to flexible working hours: A work adjustment approach. Journal of Management, 1980, 6, 117—34.
73.
Pierce, J.L. & Newstrom, J.W.The design of flexible work schedules and employee responses: Relationships and process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1983, 4, 247—62.
74.
Pierce, J.L., Newstrom, J.W., Dunham, R.B. & Barber, A.E.Alternative work schedules. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1989.
75.
Raghuram, S.Knowledge creation in the telework context. International Journal of Technology Management, 1996, 11, 859—70.
76.
Reinsch, N.L. Jr.Relationships between telecommuting workers and their managers: An exploratory study. The Journal of Business Communication, 1997, 34, 343—69.
77.
Rice, R.E. & Gattiker, U.E.New media and organizational structure. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds), Handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001, pp. 544—81.
78.
Robinson, S.L. & O'Leary-Kelly, A.M. Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Mangement Journal, 1998, 41, 658—72.
79.
Roitz, J. & Jackson, S.AT&T adds business continuity to the long list of telework's advantages . Journal of Organizational Excellence, 2006 , Spring, 3—12.
80.
Ruppel, C.P. & Harrington, S.J. Telework: An innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon? The DATABASE for Advances in InformationSystems, 1995, 26(2—3), 87—104.
81.
Sachau, D., Houlihan, D. & Gilbertson, T.Predictors of employee resistance to supervisors' requests. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1999, 139, 611—21.
82.
Salancik, G.J. & Pfeffer, J.A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design . Administrative Science Quarterly,1978, 23, 224—53.
83.
Sarbaugh-Thompson, M. & Feldman, M.S.Electronic mail and organizational communication: Does saying `hi' really matter?Organization Science, 1998, 9, 685—98.
84.
Schaubroeck, J., Cotton, J.L. & Jennings, K.R.Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1989, 10, 35—58.
85.
Shapiro, D.L., Furst, S.A., Spreitzer, G.M. & Von Glinow, M.A.Transnational teams in the electronic age: Are team identity and high performance at risk?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23, 455—67.
86.
Sherony, K.M. & Green, S.G.Co-worker exchange relationships between co-workers, leader—member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87, 542—8.
87.
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B.The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley, 1976.
88.
SHRM Foundation.Benefits Survey. Society for Human Resource Management, 2001.
89.
Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M. & Hulin, C.L.Measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1969.
90.
Spector, P.E.Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?Journal of Applied Psychology , 1987, 72, 438—43.
91.
Spector, P.E. & Brannick, M.T.The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1995, 10, 249—74.
92.
Stephens, G.K. & Szajna, B. Perceptions and expectations: Why people choose a telecommuting work style. International Journal ofElectronic Commerce, 1998, 3(1), 70—85.
93.
Straus, S.G. & McGrath, J.E.Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology , 1994, 79, 87—97.
94.
Thatcher, S.M.B. & Zhu, X.Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31, 1076—88.
95.
Vega, G.Managing teleworkers and telecommuting strategies. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.
96.
Watson-Fritz, M.B., Narasimhan, S. & Rhee, H.S.Communication and coordination in the virtual office. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1998, 14, 7—28.
97.
Wiesenfeld, B.M., Raghuram, S. & Garud, R.Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 1999, 19, 777—90.
98.
Wiesenfeld, B.M., Raghuram, S. & Garud, R.Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 2001, 27, 213—29.
99.
Williams, K.D.Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007 , 58, 425—52.
100.
WorkatWork.WorldatWork 2006Telework Trendlines, February 2007.
101.
Workman, M., Kahnweiler, W. & Bommer, W.The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2003, 63, 199—219.
102.
Yap, C.S. & Tng, H. Factorsassociated with attitudes towards telecommuting . Information and Management, 1990, 19, 227—35.
103.
Yoo, Y. & Alavi, M. Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus . MIS Quarterly, 2001, 25, 371—90.
104.
Zack, M.H.Interactivity and communication-mode choice in on-going management groups . Information Systems Research, 1993, 4, 207—39.
105.
Zahn, G.L.Face-to-face communication in an office setting: The effects of position, proximity, and exposure. Communication Research, 1991, 18, 737—54.
