We here examine the introduction of appraisal for senior medical professionals. Our recent qualitative field research found four main experiences of appraisal (developmental, disappointed reflection, defensive assessment and cynical dismissal of appraisal as a waste of time), which we developed into a typology. We argue many professionals `play tick-box games' to give the impression of auditable practice while continuing to practise in a traditional way. We develop existing theory on the `audit society', social defences and `mock bureaucracy' to explain interrelating defences which occur in appraisal as a reaction to the risks and conflict experienced in professional regulation.
Abbott, A.The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor . Chicago, IL: Chicago Press, 1988 .
2.
Ackroyd, S.Organization contra organizations: Professions and organizational change in the United Kingdom. Organization Studies, 1996, 17(4), 599—621.
3.
Alvesson, M.Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations , 2001, 54(7), 863—86.
4.
Bain, A.Social defenses against organizational learning. Human Relations , 1998, 51(3), 413—30.
5.
Barlow, G.Deficiencies and the perpetuation of power: Latent functions in management appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 1989, 26(5), 499—517.
6.
Baum, H.Why school systems resist reform: A psychoanalytic perspective. Human Relations, 2002, 55(2), 1—26.
7.
Boreham, P. Indetermination: Professional knowledge, organization and control. The Sociological Review, 1983, 31(4), 693—718.
8.
Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R.Contracts, competition, and accounting in recent legal enactments for the health and education sectors in the UK: An example of juridification at work . In S. Deakin & J. Michie (Eds), Contracts, co-operation and competition: Studies in economics, management and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 214—52.
9.
Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R.Resisting the `new public management': Absorption and adsorbing groups in schools and GP practices in the UK. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1998, 11(4), 403—35.
10.
Bryman, A.Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
11.
Degeling, P., Kennedy, J., Macbeth, F., Telfer, B., Maxwell, S. & Coyle, B.Practitioner perspectives on objectives and outcomes of clinical governance: Some evidence from Wales. In A. Gray & S. Harrison (Eds), Governing medicine: Theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2004, pp. 60—77.
12.
Dent, M.Doctors, peer review and quality assurance. In T. Johnson, G. Larkin & M. Saks (Eds), Health professionals and the state in Europe. London: Routledge , 1995, pp. 86—102.
13.
Department of Health.Working for patients, Cmnd 555. London: HMSO, 1989.
14.
Department of Health.A first class service: quality in the new NHS. London: HMSO, 1998.
15.
Department of Health. Advance letter (MD) 6/00: Consultants' contract: Annual appraisal for consultants, 2000.
16.
Department of Health.Trust, assurance and safety: The regulation of health professionals in the 21st century. London: Department of Health, 2007 .
17.
Donaldson, L.Good doctors, safer patients: Proposals to strengthen the system and to assure and improve the performance of doctors and to protect the safety of patients, Cm 276071. London: HMSO, 2006.
18.
Dopson, S.The diffusion of medical innovations: Can figurational sociology contribute?Organization Studies, 2005, 26(8), 1125—44.
19.
Eades, E. & Graham, D. Editorial : Appraisal and the medical profession. Clinician in Management, 2004, 12(4), 149—51.
20.
Edmondson, A.Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999, 44, 350—83.
21.
Eisenhardt, K.Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4), 532—50.
22.
Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. & Pettigrew, A.New public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
23.
Fineman, S. & Gabriel, Y.Experiencing organizations. London: Sage, 1996.
24.
Fletcher, C.Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2001 , 74, 473—87.
25.
Foucault, M.Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago , 1991, pp. 87—104.
Gabriel, Y. (Ed.) Organization in depth. London: Sage, 1999.
28.
Gmc.Revalidating doctors: Ensuring standards, securing the future. London: General Medical Council, 2000.
29.
Gouldner, A.W.Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe, IL : Free Press, 1954.
30.
Grint, K.What's wrong with performance appraisals? A critique and a suggestion . Human Resource Management Journal, 1993 , 3(3), 61.
31.
Harrison, S. & Smith, C.Neo-bureaucracy and public management: The case of medicine in the National Health Service. Competition & Change, 2003, 7(4), 243—54.
32.
Hirschhorn, L.The primary risk. Human Relations, 1999, 52(1), 5—23.
33.
Hoggett, P.New modes of control in the public services. Public Administration , 1996, 74, 9—32.
34.
Hood, C.Gaming in Targetworld: The targets approach to managing British public services . Public Administration Review, 2006 , 66(4), 515—21.
35.
Hyde, P. & Davies, H.T.O.Service design, culture and performance: Collusion and coproduction in health care. Human Relations, 2004, 57, 1407—26.
36.
Jaques, E.Social systems as a defence against persecutory and depressive anxiety . In M. Klein, P. Heimann & R.E. Money-Kyrle (Eds), New directions in psychoanalysis. London : Tavistock, 1955, pp. 478—98.
37.
Klein, M.Developments in psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press, 1952.
38.
Langley, A.Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4), 691—710.
39.
Larson, M.The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. London: University of California Press, 1977.
40.
Legge, K.Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. London : Macmillan, 1995.
41.
MacDonald, K.The sociology of professions. London: Sage, 1995.
42.
March, J. & Olson, J.Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 1983, 77, 281—96.
43.
McGivern, G. & Adams, R.Clinically-owned reflective practice and tick box exercises: Comparative analysis of GP and consultant appraisal in practice. Clinician in Management , 2006, 14(3), 129—41.
44.
Menzies, I. A case study in the functioning of the social system as a defence against anxiety. Human Relations, 1959, 13, 95—121.
45.
Meyer, J. & Rowan, B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony . American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83, 340—63.
46.
Miles, M. & Huberman, M.Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage, 1994.
47.
Mintzberg, H. Mintzbergon management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York: Free Press, 1989.
48.
Newton, T. & Findlay, P.Playing God? The performance of appraisal. Human Resource Management Journal, 1996, 6(3), 42—58.
49.
O'Neill, O. A question of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
50.
Power, M.Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society , 1996, 21(2—3), 289—315.
51.
Power, M.The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1997 .
52.
Redman, T., Snape, E., Thompson, D. & Ka-Ching, F.Y.Performance appraisal in an NHS hospital. Human Resource Management Journal, 2000, 10(1), 48—62.
53.
Reed, M.New managerialism and changing forms of organizational governance: Governance without governance?Paper at Condor Seminar Series Conference, Ecole Poly-technique, Paris , 2003.
54.
Schon, D.Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass, 1987.
55.
Silverman, D.Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction , 2nd edn. London : Sage, 2001.
56.
Smith, J.Safeguarding patients: Lessons from the past — Proposals for the future . The Shipman Inquiry (CM 6394), 2004.
57.
Taylor, C.M., Wall, D.W. & Taylor, C.L.Appraisal of doctors: Problems with terminology and a philosophical tension . Medical Education, 2002, 36(7), 667—71.
58.
Townley, B.Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management . Academy of Management Review, 1993a, 18(3), 518—45.
59.
Townley, B.Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies, 1993b, 30(2), 221—38.
