This article examines the May 1996 Everest disaster through the lens of limits and liminality to provide an alternative interpretation of the significance of the event as a counterpoint to existing accounts. The Everest disaster is an example of management under the most extreme conditions and also an example of a common managerial mindset that is prevalent in the literature on leadership and strategy that anything can be achieved by organizations with appropriate strategic intent and leadership. Rather than focusing upon how disaster could have been avoided by better management, we trace the roots of the disaster to the impact of liminality in extreme conditions and we consider the implications for organizations with liminal team members, a condition that is becoming more prevalent in contemporary organizations.
Audia, P.G. , Locke, E.A. & Smith, K.G.The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change . Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(5), 837—53 .
2.
Bonington, C.The Everest years. London: Hodder & Stoughton , 1986.
3.
Boukreev, A. & De Walt, G.W.The climb: Tragic ambitions on Everest. New York : St Martin's Press , 1997.
Coburn, B.Everest: Mountain without mercy. Washington, DC : National Geographic Society , 1997.
6.
Czarniawska, B. & Mazza, C.Consulting as liminal space . Human Relations, 2003, 56(3), 267—90 .
7.
Elmes, M. & Barry, D.Deliverance, denial and the Death Zone: A study of narcissism and regression in the May 1996 Everest climbing disaster . Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 1999, 35, 163—87 .
8.
Eriksson-Zetterquist, U.Gender construction in corporations. In B . Czarniawska & H. Hopfl (Eds), Casting the other: Production and maintenance of inequality in organizations. London: Routledge , 2002, pp. 89—103.
9.
Farjoun, M. & Starbuck, W.M. Introduction : Organizational aspects of the Columbia Disaster. In W.H. Starbuck & M. Farjoun (Eds), Organization at the limit: Lessons from the Columbia Disaster. Oxford: Blackwell , 2005, pp. 3—10.
10.
Gammelgaard, L.Climbing high: A woman's account of surviving the Everest tragedy . Seattle, WA: Seal Press , 1999.
11.
Garsten, C. Betwixt and between : Temporary employees as liminal subjects in flexible organizations . Organization Studies, 1999, 20(4), 601—17 .
12.
Groom, M.Sheer will. Milsons Point , NSW: Random House Australia , 1997.
13.
Hamel, G.Leading the revolution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press , 2000.
14.
Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K.Strategic intent . Harvard Business Review, 1989, May/June, 63—76 .
15.
Hamel, G. & Valikangas, L.The quest for resilience . Harvard Business Review, 2003, September, 52—63 .
16.
Katzenbach, J.R. (Ed.). The wisdom of teams . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press , 1998.
17.
Kayes, D.C.The 1996 Mount Everest climbing disaster: The breakdown of learning in teams . Human Relations, 2004, 57, 1263—84 .
18.
Kayes, D.C.Destructive goal pursuit: The Mount Everest disaster. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan , 2006.
19.
Kets de Vries, M.F.R.Life and death in the executive fast lane. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass , 1995 .
20.
Krakauer, J.Into thin air. New York: Anchor Books , 1997.
Leadbetter, C.Living on thin air. The new economy. London: Viking , 1999.
23.
Leavitt, H.The old days, hot groups and managers' lib . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41, 288—301 .
24.
Lippman-Blumen, J. & Leavitt, H.Hot groups. New York: Oxford University Press , 1999.
25.
Miles, R.E. & Snow, C.C. Organizations : New concepts for new forms . California Management Review, 1986, 38, 62—73 .
26.
Noël, A.Strategic cores and magnificent obsessions: Discovering strategy formation through daily activities of CEOs . Strategic Management Journal , 1989, 10, Special Issue, 33—49 .
27.
Powell, W.W.Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization . Research in Organizational Behavior, 1990, 12, 295—336 .
28.
Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, G.The core competence of the corporation . Harvard Business Review , 1990, May/June, 79—91 .
29.
Roberto, M.A.Lessons from Everest: The interaction of cognitive bias, psychological safety, and system complexity . California Management Review , 2002, 45, 135—68 .
30.
Starbuck, W.H. & Farjoun, M. (Eds). Organization at the limit: Lessons from the Columbia Disaster. Oxford: Blackwell , 2005.
31.
Tempest, S. & Starkey, K.The effects of liminality on individual and organizational learning . Organization Studies, 2004, 25(4), 507—27 .
32.
Tichy, N. & Sherman, S.Control your destiny or someone else will. London : Harper-Collins , 1995.
33.
Turner, V.The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul , 1969 .
34.
Useem, M.The leadership lessons of Mount Everest . Harvard Business Review, 2001, October, 51—8 .
35.
Vaughan, D.Systems effects: On slippery slopes, repeating negative patterns, and learning from mistake? In W.H. Starbuck & M. Farjoun (Eds), Organization at the limit: Lessons from the Columbia Disaster. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing , 2005 , pp. 41—59.
36.
Weathers, B. with Michaud, S.G.Left for dead. London: Little, Brown and Company , 2000.
37.
Wells, D.Seven summits. New York: Warner Books , 1988.
38.
Westley, F. & Mintzberg, H.Visionary leadership and strategic management . Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10, Special Issue, 17—32 .
