This longitudinal qualitative study examined the role of committees as strategic practice during the implementation of personnel development in a public administration. The results show that the interaction between the management levels is not only organized in formal committees where the middle managers undertake strategic initiatives and the strategic context is set by the senior managers. Rather, the middle managers and the senior managers organize the discussion on strategic issues in informal interactions around committees. These close informal interactions can be understood as a strategic conversation that entails the micro-mechanisms of generating an understanding, aligning towards an issue and making prearrangements which give support for the flow of discussion. The findings show that the strategic conversations are beneficial within shaping strategy as they frame the committee as strategic practice and enable the strategic context to be reshaped and redefined.
Amason, A.C.Good and bad conflict in strategic decision making. In V. Papadakis & P. Barwise (Eds), Strategic decisions. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1997, pp. 51—63.
2.
Ashford, S., Rothbard, N.P., Piderit, S.K. & Dutton, J.E.Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly,1998, 43, 23—57.
3.
Balogun, J.From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential: Creating change intermediaries . British Journal of Management, 2003, 14, 69—83.
4.
Balogun, J.Managing change: Steering a course between intended strategies and unanticipated outcomes. Long Range Planning, 2006, 39, 29—49.
5.
Balogun, J. & Johnson, G.Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(4), 523—49.
6.
Balogun, J. & Johnson, G.From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 2005, 26(11), 1573—602.
7.
Balogun, J., Gleadle, P., Hope Hailey, V. & Willmott, H.Managing change across boundaries: Boundary-shaking practices. British Journal of Management, 2005, 16, 261—78.
8.
Balogun, J., Huff, A.S. & Johnson, P.Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing . Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(1), 197—224.
9.
Balogun, J., Jarzabkowski, P. & Seidl, D.Strategizing activity and practice. In V. Ambrosini & M. Jenkins (Eds), Advances strategic management. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007, pp. 196—212.
10.
Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S.Beyond the m-form. Toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14, 23—46.
11.
Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S.Changing the role of top management. Beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Business Review, 1995, 73(3), 132—42.
12.
Boje, D.M.The storytelling organization. A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991 , 36, 106—26.
13.
Boje, D.M.Stories of the storytelling organization. A postmodern analysis of Disney as `Tamara-land'. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38, 997—1017.
14.
Bower, J.L.Managing the resource allocation process. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1970.
15.
Bower, J.L.Process research on strategic decisions. A personal perspective. In V. Papadakis & P. Barwise (Eds), Strategic decisions. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1997, pp. 17—35.
16.
Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 2001, 12(2), 198—213.
17.
Burgelman, R.A.Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Insights from a process study. Management Science, 1983, 29(12), 1349—64.
18.
Burgelman, R.A. A process model of strategic business exit. Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17, 193—214.
19.
Currie, G.The influence of middle managers in the business planning process. A case study in the UK NHS. British Journal of Managmenet, 1999, 10, 141—55.
20.
Currie, G.The public manager in 2010 — The role of middle managers in strategic change in the public sector. Public Money and Management, 2000, 20(1), 17—22.
21.
Currie, G. & Brown, A.D. A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in UK hospitals. Human Relations, 2003, 56, 563—86.
22.
Currie, G. & Procter, S.Exploring the relationships between HR and middle managers. Human Resources Management Journal, 2001, 11(3), 53—69.
23.
Datta, D.K. & Rajagopalan, N.Industry structure and CEO characteristics. An empirical study of succession events. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19, 833—52.
24.
Dutton, J.E. & Ashford, S.J.Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review , 1993, 18(3), 397—428.
25.
Dutton, J.E. & Duncan, R.B.The influence of the strategic planning process on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 1987, 8, 103—16.
26.
Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., Lawrence, K.A. & Mider-Rubino, K.Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science , 2002, 13, 355—69.
27.
Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., O'Neill, R.M. & Hayes, E.Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18, 407—25.
28.
Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., O'Neill, R.M. & Lawrence, K.A.Moves that matters: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 2001 , 44(4), 716—36.
29.
Eisenhardt, K.M.Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 4(4), 532—50.
30.
Floyd, S.W. & Lane, P.J.Strategizing throughout the organization. Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 2000 , 25(1), 154—77.
31.
Floyd, S.W. & Wooldridge, B.Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13, 153—67.
32.
Floyd, S.W. & Wooldridge, B.Dinosaurs or dynamos? Recognizing middle management's strategic role. Academy of Management Executive, 1994, 8(4), 47—57.
33.
Floyd, S.W. & Wooldridge, B.Middle managements strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 1997, 34(3), 465—85.
34.
Forbes, D.P. & Milliken, F.J. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(3), 489—505.
35.
Ford, J.D.Organizational change as shifting conversations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1999, 12, 480—500.
36.
Ford, J.D. & Ford, L.W.The role of conversations in producing interntional change in organizations . Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, 541—70.
37.
Fredrickson, J.W.The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11(2), 280—97.
38.
Gephart, R.Succession sensemaking and organizational change: A story of deviant college president. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1991, 4(3), 35—44.
39.
Gephart, R.Hazardous measures: An interpretive textual analysis of quantitative sensemaking during crises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1997, 18, 583—622.
40.
Gioia, D.A. & Chittipeddi, K.Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, 433—48.
41.
Gioia, D.A. & Thomas, J.B. Identity , image, and issue interpretation : Sensemaking during strategic change in academia . Administrative Science Quarterly,1996, 41, 370—403.
42.
Gioia, D.A., Thomas, J.B., Clark, S.M. & Chittipeddi, K.Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science , 1994, 5(3), 363—83.
43.
Hardy, C., Langley, A., Mintzberg, H. & Rose, J.Strategy formation in the university setting. Review of Higher Education, 1983, 6(4), 24—53.
44.
Hart, S.L.An integrative framework for strategy-making processes. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(2), 327—51.
45.
Hendry, J.Strategic decision-making, discourse, and strategy as social practice. Journal of Management Studies, 2000, 37, 955—77.
46.
Hendry, J. & Seidl, D.The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(1), 175—96.
47.
Hickson, D.J., Butler, R.J., Cray, D., Mallory, G.R. & Wilson, D.C.Decision and organization — Processes of strategic decision making and their explanation. Public Administration, 1989, 67, 373—90.
48.
Howell, J.M. & Boies, K.Champions of technological innovation. The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence . The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, 15, 123—43.
49.
Huy, Q.N.In praise of middle managers. Harvard Business Review, 2001, 79(5), 72—9.
50.
Huy, Q.N.Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change. The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly,2002, 47, 31—69.
51.
Isabella, L.A.Evolving interpretations as change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 1990 , 33, 7—41.
52.
Jarzabkowski, P.Strategic practices. An activity theory perspective on continuity and change . Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40, 23—55.
53.
Jarzabkowski, P.Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 2004, 25, 529—60.
54.
Jarzabkowski, P.Strategy as practice: An activity based approach. London : Sage, 2005.
55.
Jarzabkowski, P. & Seidl, D.Meetings as strategizing episodes in the becoming of organizational strategy . Advances Institute of Management (AIM). Working Paper No. 037, March 2006.
56.
Jarzabkowski, P. & Wilson, D.C.Top teams and strategy in a UK university. Journal of Management Studies, 2002, 39, 355—81.
57.
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. & Seidl, D. Strategizing : The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 2007, 60(5), 5—27.
58.
Johnson, G. & Huff, A.S.Everyday innovation/everyday strategy. In G . Hamel, C.K. Prahalad, H. Thomas & D. O'Neal (Eds), Strategic flexibility: Managing in a turbulent environment . Chichester: Wiley, 1998, pp. 13—27.
59.
Johnson, G., Melin, L. & Whittington, R.Micro strategy and strategizing. Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(1), 3—22.
60.
Korsgaard, M.A., Schweiger, D.M. & Sapienza, H.J.Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making team: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(1), 60—84.
61.
Langley, A.The roles of formal strategic planning. Long Range Planning , 1988, 21(3), 40—50.
62.
Langley, A.In search of rationality: The purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34, 598—631.
63.
Langley, A.Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4), 691—710.
64.
Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P. & Posada, E.Opening up decision making. The view from the black stool. Organization Science, 1995, 6(3), 260—79.
65.
Lee, T.W.Using qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage, 1999.
66.
Leonard-Barton, D. A dual methodology for case studies. Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1990, 1(3), 248—66.
Mantere, S.Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity. Strategic Organization, 2005, 3(2), 157—84.
69.
Maxwell, J.A.Understanding the validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 1992, 62(3), 279—300.
70.
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M.Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook , 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage, 1994.
71.
Pentland, B.T.Building process theory with narrative. From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4), 711—24.
72.
Poole, M.S., Van de Ven, A.H., Dooley, K. & Holmes, M.E.Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research . New York: Oxford University Press , 2000.
Rouleau, L.Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, 42(7), 1413—42.
78.
Samra-Fredericks, D.Strategizing as lived experience and strategists everyday efforts to shape strategic direction. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(1), 142—74.
79.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques . London: Sage, 1990.
80.
Taylor, S.J. & Bogdan, R.Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meaning, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, 1984.
81.
Thomas, R. & Dunkerley, D.Careering downwards? Middle managers' experiences in the downsized organization . British Journal of Management, 1999, 10, 157—69.
82.
Thomas, J.B., Clark, S.M. & Gioia, D.A.Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36, 239—70.
83.
Van Maanen, J.The fact of fiction to organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 539—50.
84.
Wayne, S.J., Liden, R.C., Graf, I.K. & Ferris, G.R.The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 1997, 50, 979—1006.
85.
Westley, F.R.Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 11, 337—51.
86.
Whittington, R.Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 1996, 29(5), 731—5.
87.
Whittington, R.The work of strategizing and organizing: For a practice perspective. Strategic Organization, 2003, 1(1), 117—25.
88.
Whittington, R.Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 2006, 27(5), 613—34.
89.
Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E., Nahapiet, J. & Rouleau, L.Taking strategy seriously: Responsibility and reform for an important social practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2003 , 12, 396—409.
90.
Yin, R.K.Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
