Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2006
Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model
In studying the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance, empirical research has shown that individualistic team members exert a negative influence on team performance. However, theoretical understanding of why this relationship exists is lacking. Addressing this gap in the literature, this research proposes a theoretical model of the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance by integrating two previously distinct theories, social identity theory and the social relations model. Drawing upon these theories, we propose that team identification, meta-perception accuracy, and team identity will mediate the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance. Further, we posit that task interdependence will moderate the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team identifi-cation. In developing our work, we formulate testable propositions which are aligned with the specific relationships shown in our model. After presenting our model and propositions, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our work, and suggest areas for future research.
Albright, L. & Malloy, T.E.Self-observation of social behavior and metaperception . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 77, 726–734 .
2.
Ashforth, B.E. & Mael, F.Social identity theory and the organization . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 20–39 .
3.
Baumeister, R.F.Self-esteem, self-presentation, and future interaction: A dilemma of reputation . Journal of Personality, 1982, 50, 29–45 .
4.
Boldry, J.G. & Kashy, D.A.Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 77, 1200–1212 .
5.
Bourne, E.Can we describe an individual's personality? Agreement on stereotype versus individual attributes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 863–872 .
6.
Brass, D.J.Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 22, 331–348 .
7.
Brewer, M.B.Superordinate goals versus superordinate identity as bases of intergroup cooperation. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds), Social identity processes. London: Sage , 2001, pp. 117–132.
Campion, M.A. , Medsker, G.J. & Higgs, A.C.Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups . Personnel Psychology, 1993, 46, 823–850 .
10.
Cartwright, D. & Zander, A.Individual motives and group goals: Introduction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds), Group dynamics: Research and theory, 2nd edn.Evanston, IL: Row Peterson and Company , 1960, pp. 345–369.
11.
Castka, P. , Bamber, C.J. & Sharp, J.M.Measuring teamwork culture: The use of a modified EFQM model . Journal of Management Development, 2003, 22(2), 149–170 .
12.
Cohen, S.G. & Bailey, D.E.What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite . Journal of Management, 1997, 23(3), 239–291 .
13.
Cox, T.H. , Lobel, S.A. & McLeod, P.L.Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task . Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(4), 827–847 .
14.
De Dreu, C.K.W. & Weingart, L.R.Task versus relationship conflict, team performance and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis . Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(4), 741–749 .
15.
DePaulo, B.M. , Kenny, D.A. , Hoover, C.W. , Webb, W. & Oliver, P.V.Accuracy of person perception: Do people know what kinds of impressions they convey?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52, 303–315 .
16.
Dolan, S.L. , Díez-Piñol, M. , Fernández-Alles, M.L. , Martín-Prius, A. & Martínez-Fierro, S.Exploratory study of within-country differences in work and life values: The case of Spanish business students . International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2004, 4, 157–181 .
17.
Earley, P.C.Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34(4), 565–582 .
18.
Earley, P.C.Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39, 89–117 .
19.
Earley, P.C. & Gibson, C.B.Taking stock in our progress on individualism–collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community . Journal of Management, 1998, 24, 265–304 .
20.
Eby, L.T. & Dobbins, G.H.Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group level analysis . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1997, 18, 275–295 .
21.
Funder, D.C.On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach . Psychological Review, 1995, 102, 652–670 .
22.
Gibson, C.B.Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy beliefs and effectiveness across tasks and cultures . Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Conference, Cincinnati, OH, 1996.
23.
Gibson, C.B. & Zellmer-Bruhn, M.E.Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork . Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46(2), 274–303 .
24.
Greenwald, A.G.The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history . American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 603–618 .
25.
Greguras, G.J. , Robie, C. & Born, M.P.Applying the social relations model to self and peer evaluations . Journal of Management Development, 2001, 20, 508–525 .
26.
Hackman, J.R.The design of self-managing work groups (Technical Report 11). New Haven, CT: Yale University, School of Organization and Management , 1976.
27.
Hackman, J.R.The design of work teams. In J.W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall , 1987, pp. 315–342.
28.
Hackman, J.R.Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 3, 2nd edn.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press , 1992, pp. 199–267.
29.
Harter, S.The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York: Guilford , 1999.
30.
Haslam, S.A.Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage , 2001.
31.
Hofstede, G.Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1980.
32.
Hofstede, G.Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill , 1991.
33.
Hogg, M.A. & Terry, D.J.Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts . Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25, 121–140 .
34.
Hui, C.H.Measurement of individualism–collectivism . Journal of Research in Personality, 1988, 22, 17–36 .
35.
James, K. & Greenberg, J.In-group salience, intergroup comparison and individual performance and self-esteem . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1989, 15, 604–616 .
36.
Jamieson, N.Tomorrow the world . Inside Sport, 1999, 89, 86–93 .
37.
Karsh, B.Human resource management in Japanese large scale industry . Journal of Industrial Relations, 1984, 26, 226–245 .
38.
Kenny, D.A.Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford , 1994.
39.
Kenny, D.A. & DePaulo, B.M.Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account . Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114, 145–161 .
40.
Kenny, D.A. & La Voie, L.The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 18. Orlando, FL: Academic Press , 1984, pp. 142–182.
41.
Kiffin-Petersen, S.A. & Cordery, J.L.Trust, individualism and job characteristics as predictors of employee preference for teamwork . International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2003, 14(1), 93–116 .
42.
Kirkman, B. The impact of national culture on employee resistance to teams: A comparative analysis of globalized self-managing work team effectives between the United States, Finland, and the Philippines. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1996.
43.
Kirkman, B.L. & Shapiro, D.L.The impact of cultural values on employee resistance to teams: Toward a model of globalized self-managing work team effectiveness . Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22, 730–757 .
44.
Kirkman, B.L. & Shapiro, D.L.The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance . Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(3), 557–569 .
45.
Kirkman, B.L. , Gibson, C.B. & Shapiro, D.L.‘Exporting’ teams: Enhancing the implementation and effectives of work teams in global affiliates . Organizational Dynamics, 2001, 30, 12–29 .
46.
Kitayama, S. , Markus, H.R. , Matsumoto, H. & Narasakkunkit, V.Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72, 1245–1267 .
47.
Kozan, M.K. & Ergin, C.The influence of intra-cultural value differences on conflict management practices . The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1999, 10, 249–267 .
48.
Lembke, S. & Wilson, M.G.Putting the ‘team’ into teamwork: Alternative theoretical contributions for contemporary management practice . Human Relations, 1998, 51, 927–944 .
49.
Mann, L.Cross-cultural studies of small groups. In H.C. Traindis & R.W. Brislin (Eds), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 5. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon , 1980, pp. 155–210.
50.
McDermott, L. , Waite, B. & Brawley, N.Executive teamwork . Executive Excellence, 1999, 16(5), 15–19 .
51.
Mead, G.H.Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1934.
52.
Osterman, P.Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: Trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare . Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 2000, 53(2), 179–196 .
53.
Oyserman, D. , Kemmelmeir, M. & Coon, H.M.Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 2002, 128, 3–72 .
54.
Ramamoorthy, N. & Carroll, S.J.Individualism–collectivism orientations and reactions toward alternative human resource management practices . Human Relations, 1998, 51, 571–588 .
55.
Ramamoorthy, N. & Flood, P.C.Employee attitudes and behavioral intentions: A test of the main and moderating effects of individualism–collectivism orientations . Human Relations, 2002, 55, 1071–1096 .
56.
Ramamoorthy, N. & Flood, P.C.Individualism/collectivism, perceived task inter-dependence and teamwork attitudes among Irish blue-collar employees: A test of the main and moderating effects . Human Relations, 2004, 57, 347–366 .
57.
Scherer, L.A. , Chang, M.C. , Meredith, J.W. & Battistella, F.D.Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning . American Journal of Surgery, 2003, 185, 516–521 .
58.
Schwartz, S.H.Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, 25, 1–65 .
59.
Shamir, B.Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation . Human Relations, 1990, 43, 313–332 .
60.
Sinha, D. & Tripathi, R.C.Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim , H.C. Triandis , C.K. Kagitcibasi , S.C. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1994, pp. 123–136.
61.
Skrabec, Q.R.The myth of teams . Industrial Management, 2002, 44(5), 25–29 .
62.
Smith, P.B.The effectiveness of Japanese styles of management: A review and critique . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1984, 57, 121–136 .
63.
Sports Illustrated . Videos help teams study their play, 1987, 66(14), 134–139 .
64.
Stevens, M.J. & Campion, M.A.The knowledge, skill and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resources management . Journal of Management, 1994, 20, 503–530 .
65.
Stone-Romero, E.F. & Stone, D.L.Cross-cultural differences in responses to feedback: Implications for individual, group, and organizational effectiveness. In G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 21. Stamford, CT: JAI Press , 2002, pp. 275–331.
66.
Stryker, S.Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings , 1980.
67.
Sundstrom, E. , de Meuse, K.P. & Futrell, D.Work teams: Applications and effectiveness . American Psychologist, 1990, 45, 120–133 .
68.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds), The social psychology of intergroup relations, 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers , 1979.
69.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C.The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds), Psychology of inter-group relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall , 1986, pp. 7–24.
70.
Tata, J. & Prasad, S.Team self-management, organizational structure, and judgments of team effectiveness . Journal of Managerial Issues, 2004, 16(2), 248–265 .
71.
Thompson, J.D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1967.
72.
Triandis, H.C.Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In H.E. Howe (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1979, Vol. 27. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press , 1980, pp. 195–259.
73.
Triandis, H.C.A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology. In G. Verma & C. Bagley (Eds), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes, and cognition. London: Macmillan , 1988, pp. 60–95.
74.
Triandis, H.C.The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts . Psychological Review, 1989, 96, 506–520 .
75.
Triandis, H.C.Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J.J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1989, Vol. 37. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press , 1990, pp. 41–133.
76.
Triandis, H.C.Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 1995.
77.
Tuckman, B.W.Developmental sequences in small groups . Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 384–399 .
78.
Turner, J.C.Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E.J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in groupprocesses, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press , 1985, pp. 77–122.
79.
Wagner, J.A.Studies of individualism–collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups . Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38, 152–172 .
80.
Wagner, J.A. & Moch, M.K.Individualism–collectivism: Concept and measure . Group and Organization Studies, 1986, 11, 280–303 .
81.
Wegge, J. & Haslam, S.A.Group goal setting, social identity, and self categorization: Engaging the collective self to enhance group performance and organizational outcomes. In S.A. Haslam , D. van Knippenberg , M.J. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. New York: Psychology Press , 2003, pp. 43–60.
82.
Weick, K.E. & Roberts, K.H.Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38, 357–381 .
