Organizational studies have recently drawn our attention to the importance of liminality in our working lives. This transitional timespace is characteristic of precarious or mobile employment such as temporary, project and consulting work especially. It is understood as a fluid and largely unstructured space where normal order is suspended and which is experienced as both unsettling and creative. This article critically explores liminality through a detailed study of the neglected activities of business dinners and back-stage management consultancy. We argue that liminality can in fact be a highly and multi-structured, comfortable and strategic or tactical space. We find that the use of wider norms and routines of eating and socializing as well as of hierarchical patterns of working and of exclusion and inclusion shape the experience and outcomes of liminality. Moreover, we highlight how the context of liminality is sustained by highly structured organizational activities in the production of domestic and public meals. We conclude that business meals mark a traditional, rather than modern, practice where ‘official secrets’ continue to grease the wheels of commerce. At the most senior levels especially, the liminality between work and private spheres can be far from unsettling and fluid.
Alvesson, M.Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2004.
2.
Alvesson, M. & Johansson, A.W.Professionalism and politics in management consultancy work. In R. Fincham & T. Clark (Eds), Critical consulting: New perspectives on the management advice industry. Oxford: Blackwell , 2002, pp. 228–246.
3.
Barley, S.R. & Kunda, G.Gurus, hired guns and warm bodies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press , 2004.
4.
Bauman, Z.Life in fragments: Essays in post modern morality. Oxford: Blackwell , 1995.
5.
Beardsworth, A. & Keil, T.Sociology on the menu: An invitation to the study of food and society. London: Routledge , 1997.
6.
Beck, U.The brave new world of work. Oxford: Polity , 2000.
7.
Berman, M.All that is solid melts into air. London: Penguin , 1983.
8.
Bourdieu, P.Distinctions: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1977.
9.
Buchanan, D. & Badham, R.Politics and organizational change: The lived experience . Human Relations, 1999, 52(5), 609–629 .
10.
Castells, M.Information age: Vol. 1: The rise of network society. Cambridge: Blackwell , 1996.
11.
Clegg, S.R. , Kornberger, M. & Rhodes, C.Noise, parasites and translation: Theory and practice in management consulting . Management Learning, 2004, 35(1), 31–44 .
12.
Cook, P.H. & Wyndham, A.J.Patterns of eating behaviour: A study of industrial workers . Human Relations, 1953, 6(2), 141–160 .
13.
Czarniawska, B. & Mazza, C.Consulting as liminal space . Human Relations, 2003, 56(3), 267–290 .
14.
Czerniawska, F. & May, P.Management consulting in practice. London: Kogan Page , 2004.
15.
Deleuze, G.Postscript on the societies of control . October, 1992, 59, 3–7 .
16.
Douglas, M.Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul , 1966.
17.
Douglas, M. (Ed.). Food in the social order: Studies of food and festivities in three American communities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation , 1984.
18.
Du Gay, P.In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics. London: Sage , 1999.
19.
Dutton, J.E. & Ashforth, S.J.Selling issues to top management . Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18, 397–428 .
20.
Dutton, J.E. , Ashford, S.J. , O'Neill, R.M. & Lawrence, K.A.Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change . Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(4), 716–736 .
21.
Dutton, J.E. , Ashford, S.J. , O'Neill, R.M. , Hayes, E. & Wierba, E.E.Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers . Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(5), 407–423 .
22.
Eisenhardt, K.M.Building theories from case study research . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4), 532–550 .
Fine, G.A.The culture of production: Aesthetic choices and constraints in culinary work . American Journal of Sociology, 1992, 97, 1268–1294 .
26.
Fleming, P. & Spicer, A.Working at a cynical distance: Implications for subjectivity, power and resistance . Organization, 2003, 10(1), 157–179 .
27.
Fleming, P. & Spicer, A.‘You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave’: Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization . Human Relations, 2004, 57(1), 75–94 .
28.
Fox-Wolfgramm, S.J.Towards developing a methodology for doing qualitative research: The dynamic comparative case study method . Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1997, 13, 439–456 .
29.
Garsten, C.Betwixt and between – Temporary employees as liminal subjects in flexible organizations . Organization Studies, 1999, 20(4), 601–617 .
30.
Garsten, C.Colleague, competitor or client: Social boundaries in flexible work arrangements. In N. Paulsen & T. Hernes (Eds), Managing boundaries in organizations – Multiple perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan , 2003, pp. 244–261.
31.
Gouldner, A.W.Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press , 1954.
32.
Hagan, T. & Smail, D.Power-mapping. Background and basic methodology . Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1997, 7, 257–267 .
33.
Hasselström, A.Modes of knowing: The fashioning of financial market knowledge. In C. Garsten & M.L. De Montoya (Eds), Market matters: Exploring cultural processes in the global marketplace. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan , 2004.
34.
Hochschild, A.The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books , 1997.
35.
Jones, A.Management consultancy and banking in an era of globalization. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan , 2003.
36.
Kanter, R.M.Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books , 1977.
37.
Kitay, J. & Wright, C.Take the money and run? Organisational boundaries and consultants' roles . Service Industries Journal, 2004, 24(3), 1–19 .
Marchington, M. & Vincent, S.Analysing the influence of institutional, organisational and inter-personal forces in shaping inter-organisational relations . Journal of Management Studies, 2004, 41(6), 1029–1056 .
41.
Marshall, N.Identity and difference in complex projects – Why boundaries still matter in the ‘boundaryless’ organization. In N. Paulsen & T. Hernes (Eds), Managing boundaries in organizations – multiple perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan , 2003, pp. 55–75.
42.
Mennell, S.All manners of food: Eating and taste in England and France from the middle ages to the present. Oxford: Blackwell , 1985.
43.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A.An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage , 1994.
44.
Paulsen, N. & Hernes, T. (Eds). Managing boundaries in organizations – Multiple perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan , 2003.
45.
Pinault, L.Consulting demons. New York: Harper Business , 2000.
46.
Ramsey, L.Sealing the deal over the business meal . Consulting to Management, 2004, 15(4), 22–23 .
47.
Reich, R.The work of nations. New York: Vintage , 1992.
48.
Rosen, M.Breakfast at Spiros: Dramaturgy and dominance . Journal of Management, 1985, 11(2), 31–48 .
49.
Schwarz, M.Knowing in practice: How consultants work with clients to create, share and apply knowledge?Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, 2004.
50.
Scott, J.C.Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press , 1990.
51.
Sennett, R.The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. London: W.W. Norton , 1998.
52.
Sturdy, A.J.The consultancy process – An insecure business?Journal of Management Studies, 1997, 34(3), 389–413 .
53.
Sturdy, A.J.The adoption of management ideas and practices – Theoretical perspectives and possibilities . Management Learning, 2004, 35(2), 155–179 .
54.
Taussig, M.Defacement: Public secrecy and the labor of the negative. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press , 1999.
55.
Tempest, S. & Starkey, K.The effects of liminality on individual and organizational learning . Organization Studies, 2004, 25(4), 507–527 .
Turner, V.From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York: PAJ Press , 1982.
58.
Turner, V.Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites of passage. In L. Mahdi , S. Foster & M. Little (Eds), Betwixt and between: Patterns of masculine and feminine initiation. La Salle, IL: Open Court , 1987, pp. 3–19.
59.
Van Vree, W.Meetings, manners and civilization. Leicester: Leicester University Press , 1999.
60.
Warde, A. & Martens, L.Eating out: Social differentiation, consumption and pleasure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2000.
61.
Watson, J. & Caldwell, M. (Eds). The cultural politics of food and eating: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell , 2004.
62.
Webb, J.Organizations, self-identities and the new economy . Sociology, 2004, 38(4), 719–738 .
63.
Weber, M.Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1920.
64.
Werr, A. & Styhre , A Management consultants – Friend or foe? Understanding the ambiguous client–consultant relationship . International Studies of Management and Organization, 2003, 32(4), 43–66 .
65.
Whyte, W.F.When workers and customers meet. In W.F. Whyte (Ed.), Industry and society. New York: McGraw Hill , 1946.
66.
Zabusky, S.E. & Barley, S.R.‘You can't be a stone if you're cement’: Reevaluating the emic identities of scientists in organizations . Research in Organizational Behaviour, 1997, 19, 361–404 .
