This article investigates the process of knowledge sharing between individuals in different professional groups. Through an ethnographic study in a hospital unit, we examine the individuals’ involvement in networks of practice, their sharing of organizational values, and their operational proximity. Recent attention to networks of practice has led to a view of organizations as crossroads of networks; accordingly, boundary relations between different networks of practice are of core relevance to ensure knowledge diffusion in organizations, but empirical evidence is still lacking. Our grounded theory supports the idea that working side-by-side and having common organizational values are important bases for knowledge transfer between professional groups which belong to different networks of practice. Boundary knowledge transfer evokes new kinds of organizational citizenship behaviours. Professionals who initiate the transfer exhibit extra-role behaviours which, in turn, require the recipient to perform extra-role behaviours as well. Implications of knowledge sharing between professional groups are discussed together with recommendations for managerial action.
Albert, S. , Ashforth, B. & Dutton, J.Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges . Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25 (1), 13–17 .
2.
Allen, T.J.Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 1977.
3.
Araujo, L.Knowing and learning as networking . Management Learning, 1998, 29 (3), 317–336 .
Bechky, B.A.Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor . Organization Science, 2003, 14 (3), 312–330 .
7.
Blackler, F.Knowledge, knowledge work and organization: An overview and interpretation . Organization Studies, 1995, 41, 1021–1046 .
8.
Boland, R.J. & Tenkasi, R.V.Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing . Organization Science, 1995, 6 (4), 350–372 .
9.
Bolino, M.C.Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?The Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24 (1), 82–98 .
10.
Borgatti, S.P. , Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L.C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies , 2002.
11.
Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P.Organizational learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation . Organizational Science, 1991, 2 (1), 58–82 .
12.
Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P.Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective . Organization Science, 2001, 12 (2), 198–213 .
13.
Chambliss, D.F.Beyond caring. Hospitals, nurses, and the social organization of ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1996.
14.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B.Exploring complex organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1992.
15.
Diefendorff, M.M. , Brown, D.J. , Kamin, A.M. & Lord, R.G.Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23 (1), 93–106 .
16.
Doolin, B.Enterprise discourse, professional identity and the organizational control of hospitals . Organization Studies, 2003, 23 (3), 369–390 .
17.
Drucker, P.F.They’re not employees, they’re people . Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80 (2), 70–82 .
18.
Easterby-Smith, M. , Snell, R. & Gherardi, S.Organizational learning: Diverging communities of practice?Management Learning, 1998, 29 (3), 259–272 .
19.
Engestrom, Y.Developmental studies of work as a test bench of Activity Theory: The case of primary medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds), Understanding practice, perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1996, pp. 64–103.
20.
Engestrom, Y. & Middleton, D.Cognition and communication at work. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1996.
21.
Ferlie, E.B. , Ashburner, L. , Fitzgerald, L. & Pettigrew, A.The New Public Management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1996.
22.
Fitzgerald, L. & Ferlie, E.Professionals: Back to the future . Human Relations, 2000, 53 (5), 713–740 .
23.
Fitzgerald, L. , Ferlie, E. , Wood, M. & Hawkins, C.Interlocking interactions, the diffusion of innovations in health care . Human Relations, 2002, 55 (12), 1429–1450 .
24.
Gherardi, S.From organizational learning to practice-based knowing . Human Relations, 2001, 54 (1), 131–139 .
25.
Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D.The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice . Journal of Management Inquiry, 2000, 9 (1), 7–18 .
26.
Glaser, B.Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press , 1978.
27.
Hammer, M.Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. New York: Harper Business , 1996.
28.
Hard, M.Technology as practice: Local and global closure processes in diesel engine design . Social Studies of Science, 1994, 24 (3), 549–585 .
29.
Hubert, L.J. & Schultz, J.Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1976, 29, 190–241 .
30.
Hutchins, E.Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1996, pp. 35–64.
31.
Johannessen, J.-A. , Olaisen, J. & Olsen, B.Mismanagement of tacit knowledge: The importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about it . International Journal of Information Management, 2001, 21, 3–20 .
32.
Kiesler, S. & Cummings, J.What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds), Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 2002, pp. 57–80.
33.
Knorr-Cetina, K.Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1981.
34.
Kolb, D.Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall , 1984.
35.
Krackhardt, D.QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness . Social Networks, 1987, 9, 171–186 .
36.
Lave, J.The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave . (Eds), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1996, pp. 3–32.
37.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E.C.Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1991.
38.
Lundvall, B.-A. & Johnson, B.The learning economy . Journal of Industry Studies, 1994, 1, 23–42 .
39.
Macrì, D.M. & Tagliaventi, M.R.La ricerca qualitativa nelle organizzazioni. Rome: Carocci Editore , 2000.
40.
McNulty, T.Reengineering as knowledge management: A case of change in UK healthcare . Management Learning, 2002, 33 (4), 439–458 .
41.
Miner, A.S. & Mezias, S.J.Ugly ducklings no more: Pasts and futures of Organizational Learning Research . Organizational Science, 1996, 7 (1), 88–99 .
42.
Morrison Wolfe, E.Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective . The Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37 (6), 1543–1567 .
43.
Motowidlo, S.J. , Borman, W.C. & Schmit, M.J.A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance . Human Performance, 1997, 10 (71), 71–83 .
44.
Nelson, R. & Winter, S.An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1982.
45.
Newell, S. , Edelman, L. , Scarbrough, H. , Swan, J. & Bresnen, M.Best practice development and transfer in the NHS: The importance of process as well as product knowledge . Health Services Management Research, 2003, 16, 1–12 .
46.
Nicolini, D. & Meznar, M.B.The social construction of organizational learning: Conceptual and practical issues in the field . Human Relations, 1995, 48 (7), 727–746 .
Organ, D.W.The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI , 1990, pp. 43–72.
49.
Orr, J.E.Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press , 1996.
50.
Podsakoff, P.M. , MacKenzie, S.B. , Paine, J.B. & Bachrach, D.G.Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research . Journal of Management, 2000, 26 (3), 513–563 .
51.
Roberts, J.From know how to show how? Questioning the role of Information and Communication Technologies in knowledge transfer . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2000, 12 (4), 429–443 .
52.
Schein, H.E.Dialogue and learning. Executive Excellence, 1995, April, 4–15.
53.
Schein, H.E.Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 1996, Fall, 9–20.
54.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1990.
55.
Thompson, J.D.Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1967.
56.
Turnbull, D.The ad hoc collective work of building gothic cathedrals with templates, string, and geometry . Science Technology and Human Values, 1993, 18 (3), 315–340 .
57.
Van Dyne, L. , Graham, J.W. & Dienesch, R.M.Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation . Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37 (4), 765–802 .
58.
Wenger, E.C.Communities of practice: The social fabric of a learning organization . Health-care Forum Journal, 1996, 39 (4), 20–26 .
59.
Wenger, E.C.Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1998.
60.
Wenger, E.C.Communities of practice and social learning systems . Organization, 2000, 7 (2), 225–246 .
61.
Williams, L.J. & Anderson, S.E.Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors . Journal of Management, 1991, 17 (3), 601–617 .
