A discourse analysis of employee rhetoric before and after the introduction of shop floor work teams in a steel mill reveals important changes in expressions of ‘us’ and ‘them’ attitudes. The normative rhetoric of teamworking used by managers, insisting that all employees are working towards the same goal, raised an expectation of change in the traditional ‘them’ and ‘us’ divide between managers and workers. When workers detected little subsequent change they used the new language of teamworking to critique management in private although working in teams they reported pressure to behave differently. New working roles in teams did undermine traditional ‘them’ and ‘us’ loyalties, which fragmented to encompass finer distinctions (e.g. middle and upper management, workers and slackers) and employee attitudes became more individualistic.
Appelbaum, E. , Bailey, T. , Berg, P. & Kalleberg, A.Manufacturing advantage: Why highperformance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press , 2000.
2.
Bacon, N. & Blyton, P.Management practices and employee attitudes: A longitudinal study spanning 50 years . Sociological Review, 2001, 49, 254–274 .
3.
Bailey, T. , Berg, P. & Sandy, C.The effect of high performance work practices on employee earnings in the steel, apparel and medical electronics and imaging industries . Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2001, 54, 525–543 .
4.
Barker, J.Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38, 408–437 .
5.
Barley, S.R. & Kunda, G.Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of managerial control . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37, 363–399 .
6.
Billig, M.Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1996.
7.
Blyton, P. & Bacon, N.Working in steel: Steelworkers’ attitudes to change 40 years on . Industrial Relations Journal, 1996, 27, 155–165 .
8.
Blyton, P. & Bacon, N.Recasting the occupational culture in steel: Some implications of changing from crews to teams in the UK steel industry . Sociological Review, 1997, 45, 79–101 .
9.
ritish Steel . Reports and accounts. London: British Steel plc , 1999.
10.
Brown, R.K.Participation, conflict and change in industry: A review of research in industrial sociology at the Department of Social Science, University of Liverpool . The Sociological Review, 1965, 13, 273–295 .
Buttny, R.Social accountability in communication. London: Sage , 1993.
13.
Carabine, J.Unmarried motherhood 1830–1990: A genealogical analysis. In M. Wetherell , S. Taylor & S. Yates (Eds), Discourse as data. London: Sage , 2001, pp. 267–310.
14.
Clegg, H.The system of industrial relations in Great Britain. Oxford: Blackwell , 1979.
15.
Cohen, S.G. & Bailey, D.E.What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite . Journal of Management, 1997, 23, 239–290 .
16.
Cohen, S. , Ledford, G. & Spreitzer, G.A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness . Human Relations, 1996, 49, 643–676 .
17.
D’Art, D. & Turner, T.An attitudinal revolution in Irish industrial relations: The end of ‘them-and-us’?British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1999, 37, 101–116 .
18.
Danford, A.Teamworking and labour regulation in the autocomponents industry . Work, Employment and Society, 1998, 12, 409–431 .
19.
Ezzamel, M. & Willmott, H.Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 358–396 .
20.
Findlay, P. , McKinlay, A. , Marks, A. & Thompson, P.In search of perfect people: Teamwork and team players in the Scottish spirits industry . Human Relations, 2000, 53, 1549–1574 .
21.
Fox, A.Industrial relations and industrial sociology. Royal Commission Research Paper No. 3, London: HMSO , 1966.
22.
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine , 1967.
23.
Goodman, P. , Devadas, S. & Griffith, T.L.Groups and productivity: Analysing the effectiveness of self-managing teams. In J.P. Campbell & R.J. Campbell (Eds), Productivity in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass , 1988, pp. 295–327.
24.
Grant, D. , Keenoy, T. & Oswick, C.Introduction: Organizational discourse, of diversity, dichotomy and multidisciplinarity. In D. Grant , T. Keenoy & C. Oswick (Eds), Discourse and organization. London: Sage , 1998, pp. 1–13.
25.
Guest, D. , Peccei, R. & Thomas, A.The impact of employee involvement on organisational commitment and ‘them-and-us’ attitudes . Industrial Relations Journal, 1993, 24, 191–201 .
26.
Hackman, J. & Oldham, G.Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory . Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1976, 16, 250–279 .
27.
Hyman, R.Industrial relations: A Marxist introduction. London: Macmillan , 1975.
28.
Hyman, R.Strategy or structure . Work, Employment and Society, 1987, 1, 25–56 .
29.
Katzenbach, J. & Smith, D.The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press , 1993.
30.
Kelly, J. & Kelly, C.Them-and-us: Social psychology and ‘the new industrial relations’ . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1991, 29, 25–48 .
31.
Knights, D. & McCabe, D.Bewitched, bothered and bewildered: The meaning and experience of teamworking for employees in an automobile company . Human Relations, 2000, 53, 1481–1517 .
32.
Knights, D. & McCabe, D.Governing through teamwork: Reconstituting subjectivity in a call centre . Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40, 1587–1619 .
33.
Krippendorf, K.Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1980.
34.
Leudar, I. & Antaki, C.Participant status in social psychological research. In T. Ibanez & L. Iniguez (Eds), Critical social psychology. London: Sage , 1997, pp. 273–290.
35.
Levine, D.Reinventing the workplace: How business and employees can both win. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute , 1995.
36.
Marchington, M.Teamworking and employee involvement: Terminology, evaluation and context. In S. Procter & F. Mueller (Eds), Teamworking. London: Macmillan , 2000, pp. 60–80.
37.
Martin, J.Cultures in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press , 1992.
Mueller, F.Teams between hierarchy and commitment: Change strategies and the ‘internal environment’ . Journal of Management Studies, 1994, 31(3), 383–404 .
41.
Mumby, D. & Clair, R.Organizational discourse. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage , 1997, pp. 181–205.
42.
Oswick, C. , Keenoy, T. , Grant, D. & Marshak, B.Discourse, organization and epistemology: A debate on discourse . Organization, 2000, 7, 511–512 .
43.
Parker, S.K. & Wall, T.D.Job and work design: Organizing work to promote well-being and effectiveness. London: Sage , 1998.
44.
Pasmore, W.Designing effective organizations: The sociotechnical systems perspective. New York: Wiley , 1988.
45.
Phillips, N. & Hardy, C.Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2002.
46.
Phillips, L. & Jorgensen, M.W.Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage , 2002.
47.
Potter, J.Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. In J.E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods. Leicester: British Psychological Society , 1996, pp. 125–139.
48.
Potter, J. & Wetherell, M.Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage , 1987.
49.
Procter, S. & Mueller, F.Teamworking: Strategy, structure, systems and culture. In S. Procter & F. Mueller (Eds), Teamworking: Issues, concepts and problems. Basingstoke: Macmillan , 2000, pp. 3–24.
50.
Ramsay, H.Firms and football teams . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1975, 13, 396–400 .
51.
Safizadeh, M.The case of workgroups in manufacturing organizations . California Management Review, 1994, 33, 61–81 .
52.
Scott, W.H. , Banks, J.A. , Halsey, A.H. & Lupton, T.Technical change and industrial relations. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press , 1956.
53.
Tajfel, H.Differentiation between social groups: Studies in social psychology. London: Academic Press , 1978.
54.
Taylor, S.Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell , S. Taylor & S. Yates (Eds), Discourse as data. London: Sage , 2001, pp. 5–48.
55.
Trist, E.L. & Bamforth, K.W.Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting . Human Relations, 1951, 4, 3–38 .
56.
Turner, J.C.Towards a cognitive re-definition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1982, pp. 15–40.
57.
Vallas, S.P.The adventures of managerial hegemony: Teamwork, ideology and worker resistance . Social Problems, 2003a, 50, 204–225 .
58.
Vallas, S.P.Why teamwork fails: Obstacles to workplace change in four manufacturing plants . American Sociological Review, 2003b, 68, 223–250 .
59.
Van Dijk, T.A.Principles of critical discourse analysis . Discourse & Society, 1993, 4, 249–283 .
60.
Wall, T. , Kemp, N. , Jackson, P. & Clegg, C.Outcomes of autonomous workgroups: A longterm field experiment . Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29, 280–304 .
61.
Wetherell, M. , Taylor, S. & Yates, S. (Eds). Discourse as data. London: Sage , 2001.
62.
Whybrow, A. & Parker, S.Introducing teamworking: Managing the process of change. In S. Proctor & F. Mueller (Eds), Teamworking: Issues, concepts and problems. Basingstoke: Macmillan , 2000, pp. 103–124.
