Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2004-03
Individualism/Collectivism,Perceived Task Interdependence and Teamwork Attitudes among Irish Blue-Collar Employees: a Test of the Main and Moderating Effects?
Two-hundred and four blue-collar employees participated in a study in which we tested for the effects of individualism/collectivism (I/C) orientations (solitary work preference, supremacy of individual goals, competitiveness, and self-reliance dimensions) and perceived task interdependence on two employee attitudes: team loyalty and prosocial behavior. We found support for the hypothesis that perceived task interdependence had positive effects on team loyalty and prosocial behavior. Further, solitary work preference, supremacy of individual goals, and self-reliance dimensions of I/C had main effects on loyalty to the team. The supremacy of individual goals dimension of I/C also had a main effect on pro-social behavior. We also found that task interdependence moderated the relationships between solitary work preference and pro-social behavior. The implications of our findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baron, J.N. & Kreps, D.M. Strategic human resources: Framework for general managers . New York : Wiley , 1999 .
2.
Clugston, M. , Howell, J. & Dorfman, P. Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? Journal of Management , 2000 , 26 ( 1 ), 5 – 30 .
3.
Cox, T.H. , Loebel, S.A. & McLeod, P.L. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior in a group task . Academy of Management Journal , 1991 , 34 , 827 – 847 .
4.
Deutsch, M. Sixty years of conflict . The International Journal of Conflict Management , 1990 , 1 , 237 – 263 .
5.
Flood, P.C. , Turner, T. , Ramamoorthy, N. & Pearson, J. Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries . International Journal of Human Resource Management , 2001 , 12 , 1152 – 1165 .
6.
Hofstede, G. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage , 1980 .
7.
Hui, C.H. , Yee, C. & Eastman, K.L. The relationship between individualism–collectivism and job satisfaction . Applied Psychology: An International Review , 1995 , 44 , 276 – 282 .
8.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research . Edina, MN : Interaction Book Company , 1989 .
9.
Kirkman, B.L. & Shapiro, D.L. Understanding why team members won’t share? Small Group Research , 2000 , 31 ( 2 ), 175 – 209 .
10.
Moorman, R.H. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology , 1991 , 76 , 845 – 855 .
11.
Moorman, R.H. & Blakely, G.L. Individualism–collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 1995 , 16 , 127 – 142 .
12.
Neck, C.C. , Stewart, G. & Manz, C.C. Self-leaders within self-leading teams: Toward an optimal equilibrium . In M.M. Beyerlein , D.A. Johnson & S.T. Beyerlein (Eds), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership , Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press , 1996 , pp. 43 – 66 .
13.
Ohbuchi, K. , Fukishama, O. & Tedeshi, J.T. Cultural values in conflict management: Goal orientation, goal commitment, and tactical decision . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1999 , 30 , 51 – 71 .
14.
Organ, D.W. The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior . In B. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior , Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press , 1990 , pp. 43 – 72 .
Parkes, L.P. , Bochner, S. & Schneider, S.K. Person–organization fit across cultures: An empirical investigation of individualism–collectivism . Applied Psychology: An International Review , 2001 , 50 ( 1 ), 81 – 108 .
Probst, T.M. , Carnevale, P.J. & Triandis, H.C. Cultural values in intergroup and singlegroup social dilemmas . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 1999 , 77 , 171 – 191 .
19.
Ramamoorthy, N. & Carroll, S.J. Individualism/collectivism orientations and reactions towards alternative human resource management practices . Human Relations , 1998 , 51 , 571 – 588 .
20.
Ramamoorthy, N. & Flood, P. Employee attitudes and behavioural intentions: A test of the main and moderating effects of individualism–collectivism orientations . Human Relations , 2002 , 55 , 1071 – 1096 .
Schmitt, N. Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 1994 , 15 , 393 – 398 .
23.
Shea, G.P. & Guzzo, R.A. Groups as human resources . In G.R. Ferris & K.M. Rowland (Eds), Research in personnel and human resource management , Vol. 5. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press , 1987 , pp. 323 – 356 .
24.
Singelis, T.M. , Triandis, H.C. , Bhawuk, D.P.S. & Gelfand, M.J. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement . Cross-Cultural Research , 1995 , 29 ( 3 ): 240 – 275 .
25.
Sosik, J.J. & Jung, I.J. Workgroup characteristics and performance in collectivistic and individualistic cultures . The Journal of Social Psychology , 2001 , 142 ( 1 ), 5 – 23 .
26.
Spector, P.E. Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method . Journal of Organizational Behavior , 1994 , 15 , 385 – 392 .
27.
Stewart, G.L. & Barrick, M.R. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type . Academy of Management Journal , 2000 , 43 , 135 – 148 .
28.
Takahashi, K. , Ohara, N. , Antonucci, T.C. & Akiyama, H. Commonalities and differences in close relationships among Americans and Japanese: A comparison of individualism/collectivism concept . International Journal of Behavioral Development , 2002 , 26 , 453 – 465 .
29.
Triandis, H.C. Individualism and collectivism . Boulder, CO : Westview Press , 1995 .
30.
Triandis, H.C. & Gelfand, M.J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 1998 , 74 ( 1 ), 118 – 128 .
31.
Van der Vegt, G. , Emans, B. & Van de Vliert, E. Effects of interdependencies in project teams . The Journal of Social Psychology , 1999 , 139 , 202 – 214 .
32.
Van der Vegt, G. & Janssen, O. Joint effects of psychological diversity and interdependence on individual performance . Academy of Management Proceedings , 2001 , J1 – J5 .
33.
Van der Vegt, G. & Janssen, O. Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation . Journal of Management , 2003 , 29 , 729 – 751 .
34.
Van Vijfeijken, H. , Kleingeld, A. , Van Tuijl, H. , Algera, J.A. & Thierry, H. Task complexity and task, goal, and reward interdependence in group performance management: A prescriptive model . European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 2002 , 11 , 363 – 383 .
35.
Wagner, J.A. Studies of individualism–collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups . Academy of Management Journal , 1995 , 38 , 152 – 172 .
36.
Workman, M. Collectivism, individualism, and cohesion in team-based occupation . Journal of Vocational Behavior , 2001 , 58 , 82 – 97 .
