As virtual workplaces and homework programs become more common, workers often find themselves inhabiting multiple worlds and multiple roles simultaneously. For these individuals, boundary transitions are both more frequent and more challenging. This paper expands current theory on work-related boundary transitions by: (1) conceptualizing role conflict in the logic of dynamic communication networks, and (2) reconceptualizing ritual and routine behavior in boundary transitions as not simply aids to mental transitions but also as communicative and symbolic performance that is oriented toward other role senders. Underlying the framework is the concept of time-space paths (Giddens, 1979; Heidegger, 1996) as critical elements of role boundary identification and demarcation. This paper contributes to a better understanding of boundary issues for homeworkers by using a communication framework and emphasizing the agency that homeworkers have to mold others' expectations.
Allen, S. Locating homework in an analysis of the ideological and material constraints on women’s paid work. In E. Boris & C. Daniels (Eds), Homework: Historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. Urbana: University of Illinois Press , 1989, pp. 272–291.
3.
Ashforth, B.E. Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum , 2001.
4.
Ashforth, B.E., Kreiner, G.E. & Fugate, M. All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions . Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 25(3), 472–491 .
5.
Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, P. & Conley, S. Work–home conflict among nurses and engineers – Mediating the impact of role stress on burnout and satisfaction at work . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1991, 12(1), 39–53 .
6.
Banks, S.P. & Riley, P. Structuration theory as an ontology for communication research. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook, Vol. 16. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1993, pp. 167–196.
7.
Beach, B. Integrating work and family life: The home-working family. New York: State University of New York Press , 1989.
8.
Benson, S.P. Women, work, and the family economy: Industrial homework in Rhode Island in 1934. In E. Boris & C. Daniels (Eds), Homework: Historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. Urbana: University of Illinois Press , 1989, pp. 53–74.
9.
Boris, E. Home to work: Motherhood and the politics of industrial homework in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1994.
10.
Boris, E. & Daniels, C.R. Introduction. In E. Boris & C.R. Daniels (Eds), Homework: Historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. Urbana: University of Illinois Press , 1989, pp. 1–12.
11.
Chiu, R.K. Relationships among role conflicts, role satisfactions and life satisfaction: Evidence from Hong Kong . Social Behavior and Personality, 1998, 26(4), 409–414 .
12.
Christensen, K. Women and home-based work. New York: Henry Holt , 1988.
13.
Clark, S.C. Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance . Human Relations, 2000, 53, 747–777 .
14.
Crouter, A.C., Perry-Jenkins, M., Huston, T.L. & Crawford, D.W. The influence of work induced psychological states on behavior at home . Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 10(3), 273–292 .
15.
Dupis, A. & Thorns, D.C. Home, home ownership, and the search for ontological security . The Sociological Review, 1998, 48(1), 24–47 .
16.
Ellison, N.B. Social impacts: New perspectives of telework . Social Science Computer Review, 1999, 17(3), 338–356 .
17.
Giddens, A. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press , 1979.
18.
Giddens, A. A reply to my critics. In D. Held & J.B. Thompson (Eds), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1989, pp. 249–301.
19.
Giddens, A. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press , 1991.
20.
Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Overlook Press , 1959.
21.
Grimes, R.L. Beginnings in ritual studies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America , 1982.
22.
Gringeri, C.E. Flexibility, the family ethic, and rural home-based work . AFFILIA, 1995, 10(1), 70–86 .
23.
Heidegger, M. Being in time (J. Stambaugh, trans.). Albany: State University Press of New York , 1996.
24.
Held, D. & Thompson, J.B. Editors’ introduction. In D. Held & J.B. Thompson (Eds), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1989, pp. 1–18.
25.
Hill, E.J., Hawkins, A.J. & Miller, B.C. Work and family in the virtual office: Perceived influences of mobile telework . Family Relations, 1996, 45, 293–301 .
26.
Hochschild, A. When work becomes home and home becomes work . California Management Review, 1997, 39, 79-79 .
27.
Hylmö, A. & Buzzanell, P. The phenomenon of telecommuting and changing organizations: An organizational culture examination . Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Seoul, Korea, 2002.
28.
Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D. & Rosenthal, R.A. Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley , 1964.
29.
Kraut, R.E. Telecommuting: The trade-offs of home work . Journal of Communication, 1989, 349(3), 19–47 .
30.
Kurland, N.B. & Bailey, D.E. Telework: The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime . Organizational Dynamics, 1999, 28(2), 53–66 .
31.
Lasch, C. Haven in a heartless world. New York: Basic Books , 1977.
32.
Levinson, D. & Kumar, A. Activity, travel, and the allocation of time . Journal of the American Planning Association, 1995, 61(4), 458–470 .
33.
Lewin, K. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper Torchbooks , 1951.
34.
Marks, S.B. & MacDermid, S.M. Multiple roles and the self: A theory of role balance . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1996, 58, 417–432 .
35.
McCloskey, D.W. & Igbaria, M. A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and future research. In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds), The virtual workplace. Hershey, PA: Idea Group , 1998, pp. 338–358.
36.
Medved, C.E. The everyday accomplishment of work and family accounting for practical actions and commonsense rules in daily routines. Unpublished manuscript, 2002.
37.
Menzies, H. Telework, shadow work: The privatization of work in the new digital economy . Studies in Political Economy, 1997, 53(3), 103–123 .
38.
Mirchandani, K. Protecting the boundary: Teleworker insights on the expansive concept of ‘work’ . Gender & Society, 1998, 12(2), 168–187 .
39.
Monge, P. & Contractor, N. Theories of communication networks. Unpublished manuscript, 2003.
40.
Monge, P.R. & Eisenberg, E.M. Emergent communication networks. In F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam, K. Roberts & L. Porter (Eds), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1987.
41.
Montgomery, J. The role-theoretic conception of embeddedness . American Journal of Sociology, 1998, 104(1), 92–125 .
42.
Montgomery, J.D. The self as a fuzzy set of roles, role theory as a fuzzy system . Sociological Methodology, 2000, 30, 261–310 .
Nippert-Eng, C.E. Home and work: Negotiating the boundaries of everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1995.
45.
Parr, J. Homeworkers in global perspective . Feminist Studies, 1999, 25, 227–235 .
46.
Piotrkowski, C.S. Work and the family system: A naturalistic study of working-class and lower middle-class families. New York: Free Press , 1979.
47.
Putnam, L.L., Phillips, N. & Chapman, P. Metaphors of communication and organization. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy & W.R. Nord (Eds), Handbook of organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1996, pp. 375–408.
48.
Riley, F. & McCloskey, D.W. Telecommuting as a response to helping people balance work and family. In S. Parasuraman & J.H. Greenhaus (Eds), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world. Westport, CT: Quorum Books , 1997, pp. 133–142.
49.
Riley, P. Arguing for ritualistic pluralism: The tension between privilege and the mundane . Communication Yearbook, 1993, 16, 112–121 .
50.
Silver, H. The demand for homework: Evidence from the U.S. Census. In E. Boris & C. Daniels (Eds), Homework: Historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. Urbana: University of Illinois Press , 1989, pp. 103–129.
51.
Zedeck, S. Work, families, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass , 1992.
