Burnout and Intersubjectivity: A Psychoanalytical Study from a Lacanian Perspective

Abstract

This article examines the intersubjective process connected with burnout. On the basis of qualitative research data we investigate to what extent Lacan’s model of intersubjectivity enables us to under-stand the burnout process and to differentiate between people who suffer from burnout and those who do not. We first outline Lacan’s theory of intersubjectivity through a discussion of the dialectical master/slave relationship and the difference between imaginary and symbolic interactions. This model is then tested against the interview material of 30 special educators drawn from the results of a wider random sample survey of 765 respondents in response to a burnout questionnaire. We found that Lacan’s distinction between imaginary and symbolic functioning allows us to make a difference between high and low scorers. High scorers - among whom two subtypes can be distinguished - function mainly in an imaginary way. Among low scorers we similarly found two subgroups - one that interacts symbolically and one that interacts imaginarily, but in which latter case environmental factors are found to have a protective function.

Keywords

burnout intersubjectivity Lacan psychoanalysis qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett, L. , Ross, M.W. & Sunderland, R. The relationship between recognition, rewards and burnout in AIDS caring. AIDS-Care, 1996, 2, 145-153.

Browner, C.H. , Ellis, K.A. , Ford, T. , Silsby, J. et al. Stress, social support, and health of psychiatric technicians in a state facility. Mental Retardation, 1987, 25, 31-38.

Cordes, C.L. & Dougherty, T.W. A review and integration of research on job burnout. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18, 621-656.

Firth, J. Personal meanings of occupational stress: Cases from the clinic . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1985, 58, 139-148.

Foucault, M. L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard, 1975.

Friedman, I.A. High-and low-burnout schools: School culture aspects of teacher burnout . Journal of Educational Research, 1991, 84, 325-333.

Frosh, S. Psychoanalytic challenges: A contribution to the new sexual agenda . Human Relations, 1997, 50, 229-239.

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

Grotstein, J.S. Orphans of the ‘Real’: I . Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1995, 59, 287-311.

10.

Hallsten, L. Burning out: A framework. In W. Schaufeli , C. Maslach & T. Marek (Eds), Professional burnout. Recent developments in theory and research. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1993.

11.

Jenkins, R. , Rose, J. & Lovell, C. Psychological well-being of staff working with people who have challenging behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 1997, 41, 502-511.

12.

Kaës, R. Contribution for France: Psychoanalysis and institutions in France. In R.D. Hinshelwood & M. Chiesa (Eds), Organisations, anxieties & defences. London and Philadelphia: Whurr, 2002.

13.

Kojève, A. Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Paris: Gallimard, 1947.

14.

Lacan, J. Ecrits. Paris: du Seuil, 1966.

15.

Lacan, J. Ecrits. A selection. London: Routledge, 1977.

16.

Lacan, J. Le mythe individuel du névrosé . Ornicar, 1979, 17/18, 298-307.

17.

Lacan, J. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I, Freud’s papers on technique, 1953-1954. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988a.

18.

Lacan, J. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II, The ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis, 1954-1955. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988b.

19.

Lacan, J. The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III, The psychoses, 1955-1956. New York and London: W.W. Norton, 1993.

20.

Lacan, J. Autres ecrits. Paris: Seuil, 2001.

21.

Lee, R.T. & Ashforth, B.E. A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81, 123-133.

22.

Leiter, M.P. & Harvie, P.L. Burnout among mental health workers: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1996, 42, 90-101.

23.

Long, S. The signifier and the group . Human Relations, 1991, 44, 389-401.

24.

Miles, M. & Huberman, M. Qualitative data analysis. London and New Delhi: Sage, 1994.

25.

Miller, J.A. Les six paradigmes de la jouissance . La Cause Freudienne, 1999, 43, 7-29.

26.

Muller, J.P. & Richardson, W.J. Lacan and language. Boston: International Universities Press, 1982.

27.

Reagh, R. Public child welfare professionals: Those who stay . Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 1994, 21, 69-78.

28.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1990.

29.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. Grounded theory in practice. London: Sage, 1997.

30.

Sullivan, S.E. & Bhagat, R.S. Organisational stress, job satisfaction and job performance: Where do we go from here. Journal of Management, 1992, 18, 353-374.

31.

Vanheule, S. Burnout: Literatuurexploratie vanuit een klinisch psychologisch perspectief . Tijdschrift voor Klinische Psychologie, 2001, 31, 132-154.

32.

Vanheule, S. Qualitative research and its relation to Lacanian psychoanalysis . Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society, 2002, 7, 336-342.

33.

Vlerick, P. Exploratieve analyse van de factoriële validiteit van de Maslach Burnout Inventory . Tijdschrift Klinische Psychologie, 1993, 23, 235-250.

34.

Whitaker, K.S. Exploring causes of principal burnout . Journal of Educational Administration, 1996, 34, 60-71.

35.

Wisniewski, L. & Gargiulo, R.M. Occupational stress and burnout among special educators: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 1997, 31, 325-346.

36.

Žižek, S. Le plus sublime des hystériques. Paris: Point hors ligne, 1988.