This article examines the influence of organizational practices on role breadth self-efficacy (RBSE); a person’s confidence in performing proactive, interpersonal tasks that go beyond traditional boundaries. A longitudinal study showed that increased task control, membership of an active improvement group, and breadth of training were associated with increased RBSE. Providing a stronger basis for causal inference, membership of active improvement groups at Time 1 also had a positive lagged effect on later RBSE. These findings support the proposition that RBSE can be enhanced via organizational intervention. The study also showed that, after controlling for greater involvement, job enlargement had a negative lagged effect on RBSE. This suggests the potential detrimental consequences of enlarging jobs without also expanding employees’ autonomy and influence.
Axtell, C.M. , Holman, D.J., Unsworth, K., Wall, T.D., Waterson, P.E. & Harrington, E.Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2000, 73, 265-285.
2.
Bandura, A.Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.
3.
Bandura, A. , Adams, N.E. & Beyer, J.Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 124-139.
4.
Bandura, A. & Wood, R.Effects of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56, 805-814.
5.
Barling, J. & Beattie, R.Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1983, 5, 41-51.
6.
Bateman, T.S. & Crant, J.M.The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993, 14, 103-118.
7.
Borman, W.C. & Motowidlo, S.J.Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schnitt & W.C. Borman (Eds), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993, pp. 71-98.
8.
Chou, H.W.Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy . Computers in Human Behavior, 2001, 17, 51-69.
9.
Coleman, V.I. & Borman, W.C.Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 2000, 10, 25-44.
10.
Conger, J.A. & Kanungo, R.N.The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13, 471-482.
11.
Cook, T.D. , Campbell, D.T. & Peracchio, L.Quasi experimentation. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990, pp. 491-576.
12.
Corbitt, G.F. , Christopolus, M. & Wright, L.New approaches to business process redesign: A case study of collaborative group technology and service mapping. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2000, 9, 97-108.
13.
Cordery, J.L.Autonomous work groups and quality circles. In M.A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology. Chichester: Wiley, 1996, pp. 225-246.
14.
Crant, J.M.Proactive behavior in organizations . Journal of Management, 2000, 26, 435-462.
15.
Cronbach, L.J.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests . Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297-334.
16.
Dean, J.W. & Snell, S.A.Integrated manufacturing and job design: Modern effects of organizational inertia. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 774-804.
17.
Fay, D. & Frese, M.The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 2001, 14, 97-124.
18.
Frese, M. , Kring, W., Soose, A. & Zempel, J.Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39, 37-63.
19.
George, J.M. & Brief, A.P.Feeling good - doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 1992, 112, 310-329.
20.
Gist, M.E.The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers . Personnel Psychology, 1989, 42, 787-805.
21.
Griffin, M.A , Parker, S.K& Neal, A.An integrative model of individual work performance. 2002, under review.
22.
Lawler, E.E. , Mohrman, S.A. & Ledford, G.E.Employee involvement and total quality management: Practices and results in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
23.
McNeely, B.N. & Meglino, B.M.The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79, 836-844.
24.
Meyer, J.P. & Allen, N.J.Links between work experiences and organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1988, 61, 195-209.
25.
Morrison, E.W. & Phelps, C.C.Taking charge at work: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42, 403-419.
26.
Organ, D.W.Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988.
27.
Osterman, P.How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it?Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 1994, 47, 173-188.
28.
Parker, S.K.Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83, 835-852.
29.
Parker, S.K. & Sprigg, C.A.Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 84, 925-939.
30.
Parker, S.K. & Wall, T.D.Job and work design: Organizing work to promote well-being and effectiveness. London: Sage, 1998.
31.
Podsakoff, P.M. , MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B. & Bachrach, D.G.Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theortical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 2000, 26, 513-563.
32.
Somech, A. & Drach-Zahavy, A.Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2000, 16, 649-659.
33.
Speier, C. & Frese, M.Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative: A longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, 1997, 10, 171-192.
34.
Stajkovic, A.D. & Luthans, F.Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124, 240-261.
35.
Wall, T.D. , Jackson, P.R. & Mullarkey, S.Further evidence on some new measures of job control, cognitive demand and production responsibility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1995, 16, 431-455.
