The theoretical and empirical literature assumes stability of important attitudes and values. Accordingly, this study examined the hypothesis that the structure of the meaning of work will remain stable over time. This hypothesis was tested on two independent samples of the Israeli labour force. The first (n = 407) was a group of individuals who were interviewed twice, once in 1981 and again in 1993. The second was a new representative sample (n = 942) of the labour force, assembled in 1993, to serve as a comparison with the first sample. The findings generally support the hypothesis regarding the stability over time of the structure of the meaning of work concept.
Abramson, P.R. & Inglehart, R.Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.
2.
Berelson, B. & Steiner, G.A.Human behavior - An inventory of scientific findings. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.
3.
Bloom, B.S.Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: Wiley, 1964.
4.
Boomsma, A.The robustness of maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation models. In P. Cuttance and R. Ecob (Eds), Structural modeling by example: Applications in educational, sociological, and behavioural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
5.
Brief, A.P.MOW revisited: A brief commentary . European Work and Organizational Psychology, 1991, 1, 176-182.
6.
Brief, A. & Nord, W.Work and meaning: Definitions and interpretations. In A. Brief and W. Nord (Eds), The meaning of occupational work. Lexington, MA: Lexington, 1990.
7.
Central Bureau of Statistics . Statistical Abstracts of Israel - 1995. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics, 1995.
8.
Clarke, H.D. & Duff, N.Measuring value changes in western industrialized societies: The impact of unemployment. Political American Science Review,1991, 85, 905-920.
9.
Cragin, J.The nature of importance perceptions: A test of cognitive models . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 21, 262-276.
10.
Dawis, R.V. & Weitzel, W.Worker attitudes and expectations. In D. Yoder and H.G. Heneman, Jr. (Ed.), ASPA handbook of personnel and industrial relations. Vol. II, Motivation and commitment. Washington, DC: BNA, 1975.
11.
Dubin, R. , Champoux, J.E. & Porter, L.W.Central life interests and organizational commitment of blue collar and clerical workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 411-421.
12.
Dubin, R. , Hedley, R.A. & Taveggia, T.C.Attachment to work. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of work, organization and society. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1976.
13.
England, G.W.The meaning of working in the USA: Recent changes . European Work and Organizational Psychology,1991, 1, 111-124.
14.
England, G.W. & Harpaz, I.Some methodological and analytic considerations in cross-national comparative research. Journal of International Business Studies, 1983, 14, 49-59.
15.
England, G.W. & Harpaz, I.How working is defined: National contexts and demographics and organizational role influences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1990, 11, 253-266.
16.
England, G.W. & Misumi, J.Work centrality in Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1986, 17, 399-416.
17.
Goldberger, D. & Singal, A.The modern cave: From a centralized society to a digital community[in Hebrew]. Tel Aviv: Yediot Ahronot, 1995.
18.
Hagstrom, T. & Gamberale, F.Young people’s work motivation and values orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 1995, 18, 475-490.
19.
Harding, S.H. & Hikspoors, F.J.New work values: In theory and in practice. International Social Science Journal, 1995, 47, 441-455.
20.
Harpaz, I.The factorial structure of the meaning of work . Human Relations, 1986, 39, 595-614.
21.
Harpaz, I.The meaning of work in Israel, its nature and consequences. New York: Praeger, 1990.
22.
Harpaz, I.Work values in Israel: Stability and change over time . Monthly Labor Review, 1999, 122, 46-50.
23.
Inglehart, R.Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
24.
Jans, N.A.Organizational commitment, career factors and career/life stage . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1989, 10, 247-266.
Kanungo, R.N.Work alienation: An integration approach. New York: Praeger, 1982.
27.
Kaplan, H.R. & Tausky, C.The meaning of work among the hard-core unemployed. Pacific Sociological Review, 1974, 17, 185-198.
28.
Katz, A. , Haz, H., Gurevitz, M., Katz, A., Adoni, H., Shif, M. & Goldberg, D.Leisure culture in Israel: Changes in trends of cultural activities 1970-1990 [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research, 1992.
29.
Kelley, H.H.Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.
30.
Krech, D. , Crutchfield, R.S. & Ballachey, E.L.Individual in society. New York: McGraw Hill, 1962.
31.
Lindsay, P. & Knox, W.E.Continuity and change in work values among young adults: A longitudinal study. American Journal of Sociology, 1984, 89, 918-931.
32.
Locke, E.A.The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1976.
33.
Mannheim, B.Work role centrality in Israel: A comparison in the course of time. In A. Globerson, A. Galin and E. Rozenshtein (Eds), Human resources and work relations in Israel - New horizons[in Hebrew]. Tel Aviv: Ramot, 1990.
34.
Mannheim, B.Gender and the effects of demographics status and work values on work centrality . Work and Occupations, 1993, 20, 3-22.
35.
Mannheim, B. , Baruch, Y. & Tal, J.Alternative models for antecedents and outcomes of work centrality and job satisfaction of hi-tech personnel. Human Relations, 1997, 50, 1537-1562
36.
Mannheim, B. & Dubin, R.Work role centrality of industrial workers as related to organizational conditions, task autonomy, managerial orientation, and personal characteristics. Journal of Occupational Behavior,1986, 7, 107-124.
37.
Misumi, J. & Yamori, K.Values and beyond: Training for higher work centrality in Japan. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 1991, 1, 135-145.
38.
Morse, N.L. & Weiss, R.S.The function and meaning of work and job. American Sociological Review, 1955, 20, 191-198.
39.
MOW-International Research Team . The meaning of working. London: Academic Press, 1987.
40.
Mulaik, S.A.An analysis of the conditions under which the estimation of parameters inflates goodness of fit indices as measures of model validity . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting, Psychometric Society, Princeton, NJ, 28-30 June 1990.
41.
Newcomb, T.M. , Turner, R.H. & Converse, P.W.Social psychology: The study of human interaction. New York: Holt, 1965.
42.
Parker, S.R.The future of work and leisure. London: MacGibbon and Kee, 1971.
43.
Porter, L.W.Organizational patterns of managerial job attitudes. New York: American Foundation for Management Research, 1964.
44.
Quinn, R.P.What workers want: The relative importance of job facets to American workers. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Mimeo, 1971.
45.
Randall, M.D. & Cote, J.A.Interrelationships of work commitment constructs. Work and Occupation, 1991, 18, 194-212.
46.
Riley, M.W. & Nelson, E.E.Research on stability and change in social systems. In B. Barner and A. Inkeles (Eds), Stability and social change. Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1971.
47.
Roe, R.A. & Ester, P.Values and work: Empirical findings and theoretical perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1999, 48, 1-21.
48.
Rokeach, M.Change and stability of American values systems, 1968-1971 . Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974, 38, 232-238.
49.
Rokeach, M. & Bell-Rokeach, S.J.Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968-1981. American Psychologist,1989, 44, 775-784.
50.
Ruiz-Quintanilla, S.A. & England, G.W.How working is defined: Structure and stability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1996, 17, 515-540.
51.
Ruiz-Quintanilla, S.A. & Wilpert, B.Are work meaning changing?European Work and Organizational Psychology, 1991, 1, 91-109.
52.
Schmitt, N. & Stults, D.M.Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1986, 10, 1-22.
53.
Shvat, A.The end of the age of innocence: Unwanted withdrawal from Israeli organizations [in Hebrew]. Human Resources (Mashabei Enosh), 1997, 14, 6-7.
54.
Somers, G.G. (Ed.). Essays in industrial relations theory. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1969.
55.
Thomassen, J.A. & Van Deth, J.W.How new is Dutch politics?West European Politics, 1989, 12, 61-78.
56.
Topalova, V.Changes in the attitude to work and unemployment during the period of social transition. In R.A. Roe and V. Russinova (Eds), Psychosocial aspects of employment: European perspectives. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1994.
57.
Triandis, H.C.The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley, 1972.
58.
Turner, R.H.Role taking, role standpoint, and reference group behavior . American Journal of Sociology,1956, 61, 316-328.
59.
Warr, P.N.A national study of non-financial employment commitment . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1982, 55, 297-312.
60.
Weiss, D. ,Dawis, R., England, G. & Lofquist, L.Construct validation studies of the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation XVIII Bulletin 41. Minneapolis: Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, 1984.
61.
Zanders, H.Divergence and convergence in work related values in Europe. In J.J.J. Van Dijck and A.A.L.G. Wentink (Eds), Transnational business in Europe: Economic and social perspectives. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1992.
62.
Zanders, H.Changing work values. In P. Ester, L. Halman and R. de Moor (Eds), The individualizing society: Value changes in Europe and North America. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1993.
63.
Zusman, T.From collective agreements to personal contacts: Wages, industrial relations and the Histadrut [in Hebrew]. Economics Quarterly (Rivo’on Le’Kalkala)1995, 42, 17-35.
