This article uses data collected in the 1970s and 1980s from old people’s homes (OPHs) in the United Kingdom to explore how aesthetics are organized in residential organizations for the elderly. The analysis reviews the sensations to which OPH members are subjected and reveals the role of power in organizing aesthetic experiences. Paradoxes associated with framing residential organizations as homes and with controlling residents’ bodies are explored. I focus on the senses of smell, sight, touch, and sound with attention to staff and residents’ views of residents’ bodily messes and their constructions of residents’ death and dying. In exploring the ‘spirit of a place,’ I differentiate homey from institutional facilities (as ideal types) by noting their physical, cultural, and social attributes. In a section on socially constructing residents’ bodies, I explore how homey (more than institutional) OPHs use power to enhance residents’ dignity and rights. Conclusions affirm the value of placing the ethnographer and her bodily sensations inside the story and the need for more research on smells and power’s role in creating a positive spirit in residential organizations for the elderly.
Arnett, R.C. & Arneson, P.Dialogic civility in a cynical age: Community, hope, and interpersonal relationships. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
2.
Barbalet, J.M.Emotion, social theory, and social structure: A macrosociological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
3.
Bordo, S.Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
4.
Bourdieu, P.The logic of practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.
5.
Calás, M.B. & Smircich, L.Predicando la moral en calzoncillos? Feminist inquiries into business ethics. In A.L. Larson & R.E. Freeman (Eds), Women’s studies and business ethics. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 50-79.
6.
Campbell, R.Emotionally involved: Research on rape as emotional labor. London & New York: Routledge, 2001.
7.
Classen, C. , Howes, D. & Synnott, A.Aroma: The cultural history of smell. London & New York: Routledge, 1994.
8.
Connell, R.Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
9.
Conquergood, D.Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics . Communication Monographs, 1991, 58(June), 179-194.
10.
Corbin, A.The foul and the fragrant: Odor and the French social imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
11.
Davis, K.Reshaping the female body: The dilemma of cosmetic surgery. New York: Routledge, 1995.
12.
Davis, K.Embodied practices. London: Sage, 1997.
13.
Diamond, T.Making gray gold: Narratives of nursing home care. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Ellis, C.Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1995.
16.
Fineman, S.Organizations as emotional arenas. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotions in organizations. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 9-35.
17.
Foner, N.The caregiving dilemma: Work in an American nursing home. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
18.
Foucault, M.Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.
19.
Gabriel, Y.An introduction to the social psychology of insults in organizations . Human Relations, 1998, 51(11), 1329-1354.
20.
Gagliardi, P.Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy & W.R. Nord (Eds), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996, pp. 565-580.
21.
Gattuso, S. & Bevan, C.Mother, daughter, patient, nurse: Women’s emotion work in aged care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 31(4), 892-899.
22.
Gherardi, S.Feminist theory and organizational theory: A dialogue on new bases. In C. Knudsen & H. Tsoukas (Eds), Organizational theory as science: Prospects and limitations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
23.
Glaser, B.G. & Straus, A.L.The social loss of dying patients. American Journal of Nursing, 1964, 64(June), 119-122.
Goodall, H.L. JrCasing a promised land: The autobiography of an organizational detective as cultural ethnographer. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989.
26.
Gubrium, J.F.Living and dying at Murray Manor. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1975.
27.
Harding, S.Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.
28.
Harris, D.The nastiness of residential care . Social Work Today, 1979, 10, 33.
29.
Leidner, R.Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
30.
Leidner, R.Emotions in interactive service work . The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1999, 561(January), 81-95.
31.
Lorber, J.Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.
Lorber, J. & Martin, P.Y.The socially constructed body: Insights from feminist theory. In P. Kvisto (Ed.), Illuminating social life: Classical and contemporary theory revisited, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge, 2000, pp. 183-206.
34.
Lukes, S.Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan, 1974.
35.
Lyman, K.A.Day in, day out with Alzheimer’s: Stress in caregiving relationships. Temple: Temple University Press, 1993.
36.
Martin, J. & Knopoff, K.The gendered implications of apparently gender-neutral theory: Re-reading Max Weber. In A.L. Larson & R.E. Freeman (Eds), Women’s studies and business ethics. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 30-49.
37.
Martin, P.Y.Trade unions, conflict, and the nature of work in residential organizations . Organization Studies, 1984, 5(2), 169-185.
38.
Martin, P.Y.Gender, accounts, and rape processing work . Social Problems, 1997, 44(4), 464-482.
39.
Martin, P.Y.‘Mobilizing masculinities’: Women’s experiences of men at work . Organization, 2001, 8, 587-618.
40.
Martin, P.Y. & Segal, B.Bureaucracy, size and staff expectations for client behavior. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1977, 18(December), 376-390.
41.
Martin, P.Y. , Reynolds, J. & Keith, S.Gender bias and feminist consciousness among judges and lawyers: A standpoint theory analysis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 2002, 27(3).
42.
Mathey, M.F.A.M , Vanneste, V.G.G., de Graaf, C., de Groot, L.C.P.G.M. & van Staveren, W.A.Health effect of improved meal ambience in a Dutch nursing home: A one-year intervention study. Preventive Medicine, 2001, 32(5), 416-423.
43.
Myles, J. & Quadagno, J.Envisioning a Third Way: The welfare state in the twenty-first century. Contemporary Sociology, 2000, 29(1), 156-167.
44.
Pelzer, P.Disgust in organizations . Paper presented at the Workshop on Organising Aesthetics, Siena, Certosa di Pontignano, May 2000.
45.
Pierce, J.Emotional labor among paralegals . The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1999, 561(January), 127-142.
Polanyi, M.The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.
48.
Putnam, L.L. & Mumby, D.K.Organizations, emotions, and the myth of rationality. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotions in organizations. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 36-57.
49.
Rae, H.M.Managing feelings: Caregiving as emotion work . Research on Aging, 1998, 20(1), 137-160.
50.
Ramirez, R.The beauty of social organization. Munich: Accedo, 1991.
51.
Rasmussen, S.J.Making better ‘scents’ in anthropology: Aroma in Taureg socioculture systems and the shaping of ethnography . Anthropological Quarterly, 1999, 72(2), 55-73.
52.
Stoller, P.The taste of ethnographic things: The senses in anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.
53.
Stoller, P.Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997.
54.
Strati, A.Aesthetics and organizational skill. In B.A. Turner (Ed.), Organizational symbolism. London: Sage, 1990, pp. 208-222.
55.
Strati, A.Organizations viewed through the lens of aesthetics . Organization, 1996, 3(2), 209-218.
56.
Strati, A.Organizational symbolism as a social construction: A perspective from the sociology of knowledge . Human Relations, 1998, 51(11), 1379-1402.
57.
Strati, A.Organization and aesthetics. London: Sage, 1999.
58.
Strati, A.The aesthetic approach in organization studies. In S. Linstead & H. Höpfl (Eds), The aesthetics of organization. London: Sage, 2000, pp. 13-34.
59.
Weiskopf, R.Organizing aesthetics: (Deconstructing) the story of ‘the iron cage’ - towards an aesthetics of folding . Paper presented at the Workshop on Organising Aesthetics, Siena, Certosa di Pontignano, May 2000.
60.
Wharton, A.The psychosocial consequences of emotional labor . The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1999, 561(January), 158-176.
61.
Willson, A. When nursing the elderly doesn’t end at work: Caregivers’ narratives in the paid and unpaid spheres. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Sociology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1996.
