Direct questioning about the ‘felt sense’ of organizational actions or artefacts is an accepted way to explore organizational members’ aesthetic experience. However, this requires organizational members to be able to talk about their aesthetic experience, to translate that felt sense into language. I suggest this is often difficult due to aesthetic muteness, which is a significant problem, not just for research but for organizational practice in general. I use empirical data to illustrate how this aesthetic muteness is manifested in the research process as organizational members’ difficulty in approaching their experience from an aesthetic perspective, reframing from ‘feeling’ to ‘thinking’, inability to recall aesthetic experience and denial of aesthetic experience. I then speculate that aesthetic muteness might be caused by threats to harmony, efficiency and images of power and effectiveness and that the consequences of aesthetic muteness are aesthetic amnesia, a narrowed conception of organizational aesthetics and aesthetic stress.
Barry, D.Artful inquiry: A symbolic constructivist approach to social science research . Qualitative Inquiry, 1996, 2(4), 411-438.
2.
Barry, D.Telling changes: From narrative family therapy to organizational change and development . Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1997, 10(1), 30-46.
3.
Berleant, A.The aesthetic field: A phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1970.
4.
Bird, F.B. & Waters, J.A.The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 1989, 32(1), 73-88.
5.
Brady, F.N.Aesthetic components of management ethics . Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11(2), 337-344.
6.
Chua, W.-F. & Degeling, P.Interrogating an accounting-based intervention on three axes: Instrumental, moral and aesthetic. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 1993, 18(4), 291-318.
7.
Clair, R.P.Organizing silence: A world of possibilities. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1998.
8.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Robinson, R.The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic. Malibu, CA: Getty, 1990.
9.
Damasio, A.R.Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam, 1994.
10.
Dean, J.W. Jr , Ottensmeyer, E. & Ramirez, R.An aesthetic perspective on organizations. In G.L. Cooper & S.E. Jackson (Eds), Creating tomorrow’s organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior. New York: Wiley, 1997.
11.
Dobson, J.The art of management and the aesthetic manager: The coming way of business. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1999.
Gagliardi, P.Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy & W.R. Nord (Eds), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996.
17.
Gardner, W.L. & Martinko, M.J.Using the Myers-Briggs type indicator to study managers: A litgerature review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 1996, 22(1), 45-83.
18.
Guillen, M.F.Scientific management’s lost aesthetic: Architecture, organization, and the Taylorized beauty of the mechanical . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(4), 682-715.
19.
Jermier, J.M.When the sleeper awakes: A short story extending themes in radical organization theory . Journal of Management, 1985, 11, 67-80.
LeDoux, J.E.The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
22.
Mintzberg, H.The manager’s job: Folklore and fact . Harvard Business Review, 1990 [1975], 68(2), 163-176.
23.
Nielsen, R.P.Arendt’s action philosophy and the manager as Eichmann, Richard III, Faust, or institute citizen . California Management Review, 1984, 26(3), 191-201.
24.
Nielsen, R.P.Changing unethical organizational behavior . Academy of Management Executive, 1989, 3(2), 123-130.
25.
Ottensmeyer, E.J.Too strong to stop, too sweet to lose: Aesthetics as a way to know organizations . Organization, 1996, 3(2), 189-194.
26.
Polanyi, M.Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958 (reprinted in 1978).
Ramirez, R.Wrapping form and organizational beauty . Organization, 1996, 3(2), 233-242.
29.
Richards, D.Artful work: Awakening joy, meaning, and commitment in the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler, 1995.
30.
Sandelands, L.E.Feeling and form in social life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
31.
Strati, A.Aesthetic understanding of organizational life . Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 568-581.
32.
Strati, A.Organizations viewed through the lens of aesthetics . Organization, 1996, 3(2), 209-218.
33.
Strati, A.Organization and aesthetics. London: Sage, 1999.
34.
Taylor, S.S.Aesthetic knowledge in academia: Capitalist pigs at the academy of management . Journal of Management Inquiry, 2000, 9(3), 304-328.
35.
Torbert, W.R.Managing the corporate dream: Restructuring for long-term success. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1987.
36.
Weick, K.E.The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1979.
37.
Weick, K.E.Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
38.
Welsch, W.Undoing aesthetics. Trans. A. Inkpin. London: Sage, 1997.
39.
Wilber, K.The marriage of sense and soul: Integrating science and religion. New York: Random House, 1998.
40.
Witkin, R.W.The aesthetic imperative of a rational-technical machinery: A study in organizational control through the design of artifacts. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: View of the corporate landscape. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.
