This article is intended to contribute to debate on the arguments that are propounded both in support and in condemnation of new forms of workplace aesthetic. I draw upon experience in organizational intervention and on literature from the arenas of physical and social workplace design to support a multi-contextual debate on the new workplace aesthetic and on interpretations that are placed upon it within different contexts of study. While an essential tension of freedom and control is identified in the literature, I offer no conclusion in support or in condemnation of any particular viewpoint. Rather, I argue for a multi-perspective analysis of workplace aesthetic in order to surface meaning for different groups of actors within their own context of thinking/acting. From this, general theories for analysis of other situations may be derived rather than particular models or recipes for application.
Apgar, M.IV The alternative workplace: Changing where and how people work . Harvard Business Review, 1998, 76(3), 121-136.
2.
Argyris, C.Toward a comprehensive theory of management. In B. Moingeon & A. Edmonson (Eds), Organizational learning and competitive advantage. London: Sage, 1996.
3.
Baldry, C. , Bain, P. & Taylor, P.‘Bright satanic offices’: Intensification, control and team taylorism. In P. Thompson & C. Warhurst (Eds), Workplaces of the future. Basingstoke: Macmillan Business, 1998, pp. 163-183.
4.
Bass, B.M.Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press, 1985.
5.
Becker, F.The total workplace: Facilities management and the elastic organization. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.
6.
Beech, N. & Cairns, G.Coping with change: The contribution of postdichotomous realities. Human Relations, 2001, 54(10), 1303-1324.
7.
Berger, P. & Luckman, T.The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.
8.
Bitner, M.J.Serviscapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees . Journal of Marketing, 1992, 56(April), 57-71.
French, J.R.P. & Raven, B.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Michigan: Michigan Institute for Social Research, 1959.
29.
Gadamer, H.-G.Hegel’s dialectic. London: Yale University Press, 1976.
30.
Gagliardi, P.Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S.R. Clegg & C. Hardy (Eds), Studying organization: Theory and method. London: Sage, 1999, pp. 311-326.
31.
Goodsell, C.T.Architecture as a setting for governance . Journal of Architectural Planning Research, 1993, 10(4), 271-272.
32.
Guillen, M.F.Scientific management’s lost aesthetic: Architecture, organization, and the taylorized beauty of the mechanical . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(4), 682-716.
33.
Habermas, J.The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
34.
Hedberg, B.How organizations learn and unlearn. In P.C. Nystrom & W.H. Starbuck (Eds), Handbook of organizational design. London: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
35.
Herzberg, F.Work and the nature of man. New York: Staples Press, 1966.
36.
Kierkegaard, S.Papers and journals: A selection. Trans. A. Hannay. London: Penguin Books, 1996.
37.
Kim, D.H.The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 1993, November-December, 85-92.
38.
Nietzsche, F.The will to power. Trans. W. Kaufmann (Ed.) & R.J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage Books, 1968.
39.
Nietzsche, F.Beyond good and evil, 2nd edn. Trans. R.J. Hollingdale. London: Penguin Books, 1990.
40.
Nietzsche, F.On the geneology of morality. Trans. C. Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
41.
Nietzsche, F.Twilight of the idols. Trans. D. Large. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
42.
Pennock, G.A.Industrial research at Hawthorne . Personnel Journal, 1930, 8, 296-313.
43.
Pettigrew, A. & Whipp, R.Managing change for competitive success. London: Blackwell Business, 1991.
44.
Raymond, S. & Cunliffe, R.Tomorrow’s office. London: E&FN Spon, 1997.
45.
Robertson, P.J. & Seneviratne, S.J.Outcomes of planned organizational change in the public sector: A meta-analytic comparison to the private sector. Public Administration Review, 1995, 55(6), 547-558.
46.
Roethlisberger, F.J.Management and morale. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941.
47.
Rorty, R.Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books, 1999.
48.
Rosen, M. , Orlikowski, W.J. & Schmahmann, K.S.Building buildings and living lives: A critique of bureaucracy, ideology and concrete artifacts. In P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1990.
49.
Rothenberg, A.The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science, and other fields. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1979.
50.
Salaman, G.Work organisations: Resistance and control. London: Longman, 1979.
51.
Sennett, R.The uses of disorder. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.
52.
Smith, J.H.The enduring legacy of Elton Mayo (social scientist) . Human Relations, 1998, 51(3), 221-249.
53.
Strati, A.Aesthetic understanding of organizational life . Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 568-581.
54.
Strati, A.Organizational symbolism as a social construction: A perspective from the sociology of knowledge . Human Relations, 1998, 51(11), 1379-1402.
55.
Strati, A.Organization and aesthetics. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
56.
Sundstrom, E.Work places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
57.
Thompson, P. & Warhurst, C. (Eds) Workplaces of the future. Basingstoke: Macmillan Business, 1998.
58.
Tranfield, D. & Starkey, K.The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British Journal of Management, 1998, 9, 341-353.
59.
Turner, G. & Myerson, J.New workspace new culture: Office design as a catalyst for change. Aldershot: Gower, 1998.
