While it is widely recognized that international cooperative ventures suffer a high rate of failure, current theories, namely transaction costs, partner selection, bargaining and learning, offer limited and disjointed reasoning for it. Each of these theories is focused on a single aspect and on a limited phase in the venture’s life, neglecting the process that leads to eventual termination. To study this process, an in-depth analysis of the demise of an international cooperative venture in China traces the critical events in the venture’s life cycle. The analysis shows that escalation of partner political behavior played a key role in the venture’s failure. An integrative political process model incorporating the dynamic aspects of the relationships between parents within their environmental context is developed.
Allison, G.T.Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
2.
Anderson, E.Two firms, one frontier: On assessing joint venture performance . Sloan Management Review, 1990, 32 (Winter), 19-30.
3.
Beamish, P.W. Joint venture performance in developing countries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 1984.
4.
Chi, T.Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure . Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(4), 271-290.
5.
Child, J. , Yan, Y. & Lu, Y.Ownership and control in Sino-foreign joint ventures. In P.W. Beamish & J.P. Killing (Eds), Cooperative strategies: Asian perspectives. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press, 1997, pp. 181-225.
6.
Chowdhury, M.A.J. International joint ventures: Some interfirm-organization specific determinants of success and failures - a factor analytic exploration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1988.
7.
Cyert, R.M. & March, J.G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
8.
Das, T.K. & Teng, B.Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(3), 491-512.
9.
Davidson, W.H.Global strategic management. New York: Wiley, 1982.
10.
Eisenhardt, K.M.Building theories from case study research . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 532-550.
11.
Emerson, R.Power-dependence relations . American Sociological Review, 1962, 27, 31-41.
12.
Franko, L.G.Joint venture survival in multinational corporations. New York: Praeger, 1971.
13.
Geringer, M.Joint venture partner selection: Strategies for developing countries. New York: Quorum, 1988.
14.
Geringer, J.M. & Hebert, L.Control and performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 1989, 20(2), 235-254.
15.
Geringer, J.M. & Hebert, L.Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 1991, 22(2), 249-263.
16.
Gomes-Casseres, B.Ownership structure of foreign subsidiaries: Theory and evidence . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1989, 11, 1-25.
17.
Gray, B. & Yan, A.Formation and evolution of international joint ventures: Examples from US-Chinese partnerships. In P.W. Beamish & J.P. Killing (Eds), Cooperative strategies: Asian Pacific perspectives. San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press, 1997, 57-88.
18.
Gulati, R.Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances . Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(1): 85-112.
19.
Hamel, G.Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances . Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12, 83-103.
20.
Hamel, G. , Doz, Y. & Prahalad, C.K.Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 1989, January, 133-139.
Harrigan, K.R.Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. In F. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds), Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988, pp. 205-226.
23.
Hebert, L. Division of control, relationship dynamics and joint venture performance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, 1994.
24.
Hennart, J.A transaction costs theory of joint ventures . Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 37, 483-497.
25.
Hill, R.C. & Hellriegel, D.Critical contingencies in joint venture management: Some lessons from managers. Organization Science, 1994, 5(4), 594-607.
26.
Inkpen, A.C. & Beamish, P.W.Knowledge, bargaining power and international joint venture instability. Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(1), 177-202.
27.
Janger, A.K.Organization of international joint ventures. New York: The Conference Board, 1980.
28.
Killing, J.P.Strategies for joint venture success. New York: Praeger, 1983.
Lecraw, D.J.Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transactional corporations in developing countries . Journal of International Business Studies, 1984, Spring/Summer, 27-43.
31.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A.M.Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1989.
32.
Newman, W.H.Launching a viable joint venture . California Management Review, 1992, Fall, 68-80.
33.
Newman, W.H.Stages in cross cultural collaboration. Working paper, Center for Chinese Business Studies, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, 1995.
34.
Osborn, R.N. & Baughn, C.C.Forms of inter-organizational governance for multinational alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33(3), 503-519.
35.
Parkhe, A.‘Messy’ research, methodological predispositions, and theory development in international joint ventures . Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18, 227-268.
36.
Pearce, R.J.Toward understanding joint venture performance and survival: A bargaining and influence approach to transaction cost theory . Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(1), 203-225.
37.
Pearson, M.M.Joint ventures in the People’s Republic of China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
Pettigrew, A.M.Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice . Organization Science, 1990, 1(3), 267-292.
40.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R.The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
41.
Potter, P.B.Foreign investment law in the People’s Republic of China: Dilemmas of state control. The China Quarterly, 1995, 155-185.
42.
Ring, P.S. & Van de Ven, A.Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(1), 90-118.
43.
Salk, J. & Shenkar, O.Social identities in an international joint venture: An exploratory case study. Organization Science, 2001, 12(2), 161-178.
44.
Schaan, J.L. Parent control and joint venture success: The case of Mexico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 1983.
45.
Scott, W.R.Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems, 3rd edn.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
46.
Shenkar, O.International joint venture problems in China: Risks and remedies . Long Range Planning, 1990, 23(2), 82-90.
47.
Smith, K. , Carroll, S.J. & Ashford, S.J.Intraand interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(1), 7-23.
48.
Stopford, J.M. & Wells, L.T. JrManaging the multinational enterprise. New York: Wiley, 1972.
49.
Tallman, S.B. & Shenkar, O.A managerial decision model of international cooperative venture formation. Journal of International Business Studies, 1994, 69, 91-113.
50.
Tomlinson, J.W.C. & Thompson, M.A study of Canadian joint ventures in Mexico. Ottawa, Canada: Office of Science and Technology, Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce, 1977.
51.
Vernon, R.Storm over multinationals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.
52.
Westney, D.E.Domestic and foreign learning curves in managing international cooperative strategies. In F. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds), Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988.
53.
Wood, D.J. & Gray, B.Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1991, 27, 139-162.
54.
Xin, K. & Pearce, J.Guanxi: Good connections as substitutes for institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(6), 1641-1658.
55.
Yan, A.Structural stability and reconfiguration of international joint ventures . Journal of International Business Studies, 1998, 29(4), 773-796.
56.
Yan, A. & Gray, B.Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37(6), 1478-1517.
57.
Yan, A. & Gray, B.Reconceptualizing the determinants and measurement of joint venture performance. Advances in Global High-Technology Management, 1995, 5(B), 87-113.
58.
Yan, A. & Luo, Y.International joint ventures: Theory and practice. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2001.
59.
Yin, R.K.Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
60.
Yin, R.K.Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn.Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994.
61.
Zeira, Y. & Shenkar, O.Interactive and specific parent characteristics: Implications for management and human resources in international joint ventures. Management International Review, 1990, 30 (Special Issue), 7-22.
