This study presents an analysis of the benefits of two team structures - quality circles and self-managing work groups - for Australian work organizations utilizing the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey for 1995. The analysis indicates that firms with team structures have higher labor productivity, a flatter management structure and reduced employee turnover. The presence of team structures in Australian firms indicates a decrease in industrial harmony. The findings were inconclusive regarding absenteeism and profitability.
Blakemore, J.Quality habits of best business practice. Sydney: Prentice Hall, 1996.
4.
Bradley, K. & Hill, S.After Japan: The quality circle transplant and productive efficiency. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 1983, 25(1), 291-311.
5.
Callus, R. , Morehead, A., Cully, M. & Buchanan, J.Industrial relations at work: The Australian workplace industrial relations survey. Commonwealth Department of Industrial Relations, Canberra: AGPS, 1991.
6.
Carnegie, R. , Butlin, M., Barratt, P., Turnbull, A. & Weber, I.Managing the innovating enterprise: Australian companies competing with the world’s best. Melbourne: Business Council of Australia1993.
Cohen, S. & Ledford, G.E.The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 1994, 47, 13-43.
9.
Cordery, J.L.Work redesign: Rhetoric or reality . Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 1995, 32(2), 3-19.
10.
Cordery, J.L. , Mueller, W.S. & Smith, L.M.Attitudinal and behavioral effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 464-476.
11.
Davis, E. & Lansbury, R. (Eds) Managing together: Consultation and participation in the workplace. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1996.
12.
Diamond, M.A.Stresses of group membership: Balancing the need for independence and belonging. In M.F.R. Kets de Vries (Ed.), Organizations on the couch. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
13.
Emery, F.E.Characteristics of socio-technical systems. In L.E. Davis and J.C. Taylor (Eds), Design of jobs. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.
14.
Emery, F.E.Characteristics of socio-technical systems. In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds), The social engagement of social science: A Tavistock anthology (Vol. II). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
15.
Emery, F. & Emery, M.Participative design: Work and community life. In Center for Continuing Education Occasional Paper No. 4. Canberra: The Australian National University, 1974.
16.
Emery, F. & Emery, M.Participative design: Work and community life. In M. Emery (Ed.), Participative design for participative democracy. Canberra: Center for Continuing Education, The Australian National University, 1993.
17.
Emery, M. (Ed.) Participative design for participative democracy. Canberra: Center for Continuing Education, The Australian National University, 1993.
18.
Erwin, P.J. & Iverson R.D.Strategies in absence management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 1993, 32(3), 13-32.
19.
Gilmour, P.Operations management in Australia. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1991.
20.
Gilmour, P. & Hunt, R.A.Total quality management: Integrating quality into design, operations and strategy. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1995.
21.
Glassop, L.I.The road to quality: Turning effort into reward. Sydney: Prentice Hall, 1995.
22.
Greiner, M. , Kask, C. & Sparks, C.Comparative manufacturing productivity and unit labor cost. Monthly Labor Review, February 1995.
23.
Griffiths, A.Sociotechnical interventions and teams in Australian organisations: 1970s-1990s. Center for Corporate Change Working Paper No. 52. Sydney: Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales, 1997.
Harley, B.The myth of empowerment: Work organization, hierarchy and employee autonomy in contemporary Australian workplaces . Work, Employment and Society, 1999, 13(1), 41-66.
26.
Hillkirk, J.Self-directed work teams give IT a lift . USA Today, 20 December 1993, 57-70.
27.
Horngren, C.T. , Foster, G. & Datar, S.M.Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (6th edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
28.
Ishikawa, K.What is total quality control? The Japanese way. (Translated by D.J. Lu.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1985.
29.
Juran, J.M.The QC circle phenomena. In R.W. Berger and D.L. Shores (Eds), Quality circles: Selected readings. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1967/1986.
30.
Juran, J.M. & Gyrna, F.M.Quality planning and analysis: From product development through use (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
31.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P.The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 1992, 70(1), 71-79.
32.
Lawler, E.E. , Morham, S.A. & Ledford, G.E.Employee involvement and total quality management: Practices and results in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
33.
McGraw, P. & Dunford, R.Quality circles, employee participation and industrial relations: A study in Australian industry. Employee Participation Report, Department of Employment and Industrial Relations. Canberra: AGPS, 1987.
34.
Manz, C.C. & Sims, H.P.The potential for ‘groupthink’ in autonomous work groups. Human Relations, 1982, 35, 773-784.
35.
Manz, C. & Sims, H.P.Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of selfmanaging work teams. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 1987, 32, 106-128.
36.
Mathews, J.Catching the wave: Workplace reform in Australia. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin, 1994.
37.
Morehead, A. , Steele, M., Alexander, M., Stephen, K. & Duffin, L.Changes at work: The 1995 Australian workplace industrial relations survey. Melbourne: Longman, 1997.
38.
Orsburn, J.D. & Moran, L.The new self-directed work teams: Mastering the challenge. New York: McGraw Hill, 2000.
39.
Osterman, P.How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1994, 47, 173-188.
40.
Pearce, J.A. II & Ravlin, E.C.The design and activation of self-regulating work groups. Human Relations, 1987, 40(11), 751-782.
41.
Robbins, S.P. , Millet, B., Cacioppe, R. & Waters-Marsh, T.Organizational behavior: Leading and managing in Australia and New Zealand (2nd edn). Sydney: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
42.
Shewhart, W.A.Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York: D. Von Nostrand, 1931.
43.
Shores, D.L. & Thompson, M.C.A historical perspective: Japan and the United States. In R.W. Berger and D.L. Shores (Eds), Quality circles: Selected readings. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1986.
44.
Sundstrom, E. , De Muse, K.P. & Futrell, D.Work teams. American Psychologist, 1990, 45(2), 120-133.
45.
Trist, E.Introduction to volume II. In E. Trist, and H. Murray (Eds), The social engagement of social science: The socio-technical perspective (Vol. II). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
46.
Trist, E. , Higgin, G., Murray, H. & Pollock, A.Alternative work organizations: An exact comparison (1963). In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds), The social engagement of social science: The socio-technical perspective (Vol. II). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
47.
Tyson, T.Working with groups (2nd edn). Melbourne: Macmillan Education, 1998.
48.
Wall, T.D. & Clegg, C.W.A longitudinal field study of group work redesign. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1981, 2(31), 31-49.
49.
Wall, T.D. , Kemp, N.J., Jackson, P.R. & Clegg, C.W.Outcomes of autonomous workgroups: A long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29(2), 280-304.
50.
Weisbord, M.Productive workplaces. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
51.
Wood, R. , Hull, F. & Azumi, K.Evaluating quality circles: The American application. California Management Review, 1983, XXVI(1), 37-53.
52.
Zaiger Roberts, V.The organization of work: Contributions from open systems theory. In A. Obholzer and V. Zaiger Roberts (Eds), The unconscious at work. London: Routledge, 1994.
