Participant observation of a 6-week Executive Development Course suggests that humor provides a key mechanism for enacting a sense of community for group members. Specifically, the study examines the process through which putdown humor helps foster group identity and cohesion in a temporary group. Putdowns followed a pattern of development that signaled increasing trust and inclusion, and was regulated by implicit rules that incubated the emergent solidarity. The meaning of certain humorous episodes was equivocal, but the act of laughing together glossed over the equivocality so that the sense of community was reaffirmed. Further, social identity dynamics appeared to strongly affect perceptions of the appropriateness of humor. The authors conclude that shared putdown humor and the implicit set of rules regarding its use may facilitate solidarity, and they attempt to reconcile why ‘inclusionary putdowns’ were found here when ‘exclusionary putdowns’ are usually reported in the literature.
Alberts, J.K.An inferential/strategic explanation for the social organization of teases . Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1992, 11, 153-177.
2.
Ancona, D. & Chong, C-L.Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1996, 18, 251-284.
3.
Ashforth, B.E. & Humphrey, R.H.Labeling processes in the organization: Constructing the individual. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1995, 17, 413-461.
4.
Ashforth, B.E. & Mael, F.Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 20-39.
5.
Boxer, D. & Cortés-Conde, F.From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 1997, 27, 275-294.
6.
Cann, A. , Calhoun, L.G. & Banks, J.S.On the role of humor appreciation in interpersonal attraction: It’s no joking matter. Humor, 1997, 10, 77-89.
7.
Chapman, A.J.Social facilitation of laughter in children . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1973, 9, 528-541.
8.
Cohen, S.G. & Bailey, D.E.What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 1997, 23, 239-290.
9.
Collinson, D.L.Managing the shopfloor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992.
10.
Duncan, W.J. , Smeltzer, L.R. & Leap, T.L.Humor and work: Applications of joking behavior to management. Journal of Management, 1990, 16, 255-278.
11.
Eisenberg, E.M.Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication . Communication Monographs, 1984, 51, 227-242.
12.
Fierman, J.The contingency work force . Fortune, 1994, 129(2), 24 Jan., 30-34, 36.
13.
Fox, S.The ethnography of humour and the problem of social reality . Sociology, 1990, 24, 431-446.
14.
Freud, S.Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Trans. and ed. J. Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton, 1960[1905].
15.
Gergen, K.J.Toward transformation in social knowledge, 2nd edn.London: Sage, 1994.
16.
Gersick, C.J.G.Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development . Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 9-41.
17.
Goffman, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1959.
18.
Goodman, R.A. & Goodman, L.P.Some management issues in temporary systems: A study of professional development and manpower - the theater case. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 494-501.
19.
Greig, J.Y.T.The psychology of laughter and comedy. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1923.
20.
Gruner, C.R.The game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1997.
21.
Guzzo, R.A. & Dickson, M.W.Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 1996, 47, 307-338.
22.
Hassett, J. & Houlihan, J.Different jokes for different folks. Psychology Today, 1979, 12, 64-71.
23.
Hatch, M.J.Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of a management team . Organization Science, 1997, 8, 275-288.
24.
Hawes, L.C.Toward a hermeneutic phenomenology of communication . Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25(3), 30-41.
25.
Heidegger, M.An introduction to metaphysics. Trans. R. Manheim. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1959.
26.
Hemmasi, M. , Graf, L.A. & Russ, G.S.Gender-related jokes in the workplace: Sexual humor or sexual harassment?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1994, 24, 1114-1128.
27.
Holdaway, S.Blue jokes: Humour in police work. In C. Powell & G.E.C. Paton (Eds), Humour in society: Resistance and control. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1988, pp. 106-122.
28.
Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 602-611.
29.
Kramer, R.M. , Brewer, M.B. & Hanna, B.A.Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 357-389.
30.
Labov, W.The art of sounding and signifying. In W.W. Gage (Ed.), Language in its social setting. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, 1974, pp. 84-116.
31.
Linstead, S.‘Jokers wild’: Humour in organisational culture. In C. Powell & G.E.C. Paton (Eds), Humour in society: Resistance and control. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1988, pp. 123-148.
32.
Martin, S.E.Sexual politics in the workplace: The interactional world of policewomen . Symbolic Interaction, 1978, 1(2), 44-60.
33.
Meyerson, D. , Weick, K.E. & Kramer, R.M.Swift trust and temporary groups. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 166-195.
34.
Miles, M.B.On temporary systems. In M.B. Miles (Ed.), Innovation in education. New York:Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964, pp. 437-490.
35.
Morreall, J.Humor and work . Humor, 1991, 4, 359-373.
36.
Putnam, L.L.The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In L.L. Putnam & M.E. Pacanowsky (Eds), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983, pp. 31-54.
Raskin, V.Semantic mechanisms of humor. Boston, MA: D. Reidel, 1985.
39.
Rosenfeld, L.B.Human interaction in the small group setting. Columbus, OH: Merrill, 1973.
40.
Smith, K.K. & Berg, D.N.Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
41.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
42.
Tannen, D.You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow, 1990.
43.
Trice, H.M. & Beyer, J.M.The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.
44.
Tuckman, B.W.Development sequence in small groups . Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 384-399.
45.
Turner, V.The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967.
46.
Vinton, K.L.Humor in the workplace: It is more than telling jokes . Small Group Behavior, 1989, 20, 151-166.
47.
Weick, K.E.The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
48.
Yedes, J.Playful teasing: Kiddin’ on the square . Discourse & Society, 1996, 7, 417-438.
49.
Yoels, W.C. & Clair, J.M.Laughter in the clinic: Humor as social organization. Symbolic Interaction, 1995, 18, 39-58.
