This paper provides a field level analysis of the process by which management knowledge is produced. Two linked dynamics are identified as important components of this process. The first is the commodification of management knowledge, or the tendency to reduce knowledge to a routinized and codified product. We argue that the commodification of management knowledge is a cyclical process that has been institutionalized by the interests of distinct categories of social actors. The second dynamic, termed colonization, refers to the migration of Big Five professional service firms into adjacent professional jurisdictions. Colonization is the result of intensification of commodification and has produced intense conflict and change in the organizational field of management knowledge production.
CIFAR (Center for International Financial Analysis & Research, Inc.)International accounting and auditing trends, Vol. II, 4th edn.Princeton, NJ: CIFAR Publications, 1995.
6.
Clark, T. & Salaman, G.Telling tales: Management gurus and the construction of managerial identity. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 137-161.
7.
Consultants NewsExplosive growth makes 1998 a record year for CN50 . June, 1999, 29(6), 1, 4.
8.
Czarniawska, B. & Joerges. B.Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska and Guje Sevon (Eds), Translating organizational change. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996.
9.
Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L.Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
10.
DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W.The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48, 147-160.
11.
The EconomistAccountancy . 17October, 1992, 19-24.
12.
The EconomistThe advice business . 22March, 1997, 3-22.
13.
Evan, W.M.The organization set: Toward a theory of interorganizational relations. In J.D. Thompson (Ed.), Approaches to organizational design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1966.
14.
Freidson, E.Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
15.
Furusten, S. The managerial discourse: A study of the creation and diffusion of popular management knowledge. Unpublished dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies, 1995.
16.
Gibbins, M. & Wright, A.Expertise and knowledge management in public accounting firms: A North American perspective. Australian Accounting Review, 1999, 9(3), 27-34.
17.
Gilmore, J.H. & Pine, J.B.The four faces of mass customization. Harvard Business Review, 1997, January/February, 75(1), 91-101.
18.
Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C.R.Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal. 1993, 36(5), 1052-1081.
19.
Greenwood, R. , Hinings, C.R. & Brown, C.R.P2-form strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33, 725-755.
20.
Greenwood, R. , Suddaby, R. & Hinings, R.The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalised fields. Paper presented at SCANCOR conference, Carriers of Management Knowledge, Stanford University, 23 September, 1998.
21.
Guillen, M.F.The age of eclecticism: Current organizational trends and the evolution of managerial models . Sloan Management Review, 1994, Fall, 75-87.
22.
Guillen, M.F.International management and the circulation of ideas . Journal of Organization Behaviour, 1998, 5, 47-63.
23.
Hansen, M.T. , Nohria, L. & Tierney, T.What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard Business Review, 1999, 77(2), 106-116.
24.
Haynes, P.A different school of thought . Forbes, 1998, 161(9), 4 May, 134-135.
25.
Hirsch, P.M.Processing fads and fashions: An organization set analysis of cultural industry systems . American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 77, 639-659.
26.
Hitt, M.A.Twenty first century organizations: Business firms, business schools and the academy . Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2), 218-224.
27.
Huczynski, A.Management gurus: What makes them and how to become one. London: Routledge, 1993.
28.
Journal of AccountancyErnst & Young first of Big Five to ally with law firm , 2000, 189(1), 11-14.
29.
Kennedy Research GroupThe market for consulting services. Fitzwilliam, NH: Kennedy Publishers, 1997.
30.
Kieser, A.How management science, consultancies and business companies (do not) learn from each other: Applying concepts of learning to different types of organizations and to inter-organizational learning . Paper presented at SCANCOR conference, Stanford University, 1998.
31.
King, J.Consultancy uses MBA program to retain talent . Computerworld, 1998, 32(30), 14.
32.
McKenna, C.Selling corporate culture: Codifying and commodifying professionalism at McKinsey & Company, 1940-1980. Unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University, 1999.
33.
Maister, D.Managing the professional service firm. New York: Free Press, 1993.
34.
Margheim, L. & Kelly, T.The perceived effects of fixed fee audit billing arrangements. Accounting Horizons, 1992, 6(4), 62-72.
35.
Meister, J.C.Corporate universities: Lessons in building a world class work force. New York: Irwin. 1998.
36.
Melnitzer, J.Here come the bean counters: A primer on multidisciplinary Practice . Canadian Lawyer, 1999, 23(11), 34-40.
37.
Micklethwait, J. & Wooldridge, A.The witch doctors: Making sense of the management gurus. New York: Random House, 1997.
38.
Moore, K. & Birkinshaw, J.Managing knowledge in global service firms: Centers of excellence. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 81-92.
39.
Nelsen, B.J. & Barley, S.R.For love or money? Commodification and the construction of an occupational mandate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(4), 619-653.
40.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H.The knowledge creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
41.
Pearce, J.A.Faculty survey on business education . Academy of Management Executive, 1999, 105-109.
42.
Pelton, J.Cyberlearning vs. the university: An irresistible force meets an immovable object . The Futurist, 1996, November/December, 17-20.
Peters, T.J. & Waterman, R.H.In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row, 1982.
45.
Porter, L.W.A decade of change in the business school: From complacency to tomorrow . Selections, 1997, Winter, 1-8.
46.
Public Accounting Report Top 100 for 1991. 15 March, 1992.
47.
Public Accounting Report Top 100 for 1998. 15 March, 1999.
48.
Rovik, K.Deinstitutionalization and the logic of fashion. In B. Czarniawska and Guje Sevon (Eds), Translating organizational change. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996.
49.
Savary, M.Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry . California Management Review, 1999, 41(2), 95-107.
50.
Scott, W.R.Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
51.
Simunic, D.A.The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence . Journal of Accounting Research, 1980, Spring, 161-190.
52.
Stevens, M.The Big Six: The selling out of America’s top accounting firms. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991.
53.
Strang, D.Cheap talk: Managerial discourse on quality circles as an organizational innovation . Paper presented at the 1997 meeting of the American Sociological Association, Toronto, 1997.
54.
Trebilcock, M. & Csorgo, L.Multidisciplinary professional practices: A consumer welfare perspective. Toronto: Charles River Associates, 1999.
55.
Wernerfeldt, B.A resource based view of the firm . Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5, 171-180.
56.
Williamson, O.E.Markets and hierarchies, analysis and implications: A study in the economies of internal organization. New York: Free Press, 1975.
57.
Willmott, H.Managing the academics: Commodification and control in the development of university education in the UK . Human Relations, 1995, 48(9), 993-1028.
58.
Wooten, C.W. & Wolk, L.Big Eight accounting firms. In M. Chatfield and R. Vangersmeersch (Eds), The history of accounting. New York: Garland Publishing, 1996.
