Abstract
Data from Kenya are utilized to revisit the Lincoln-Kalleberg corporatist control argument with a view to extending it to incorporate a fourth category - stress-reducing structures - of structural determinants of satisfaction and attachment. The results show strong support for the extended model and are consistent with Mueller et al. (1994) and Wallace's (I1995) position that the Lincoln-Kalleberg model is a general one that explains satisfaction and attachment even in non-corporatist work settings. It is concluded that the importance of work structures as determinants of satisfaction and attachment may differ across work settings but they are the basis of any initial model for explaining the same.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
