Beginning as a subversive and anti-establishment movement in France in the 1920s, surrealism was primarily a movement whose `voice' came through the written word. Later the movement extended into the visual arts, with which it is more generally associated. Surrealism was always intended as a way of thinking, a way of feeling and, indeed, a philosophy of life. This way of thinking now appears to have permeated the discourse of organization theory in both the orientation and `techniques' that are advocated by a group of writers who claim, or invoke, the insights of postmodernists (/poststructuralists). Drawing on recently published work by the critical theorists Adorno, Benjamin and Marcuse, we argue that the field needs to consider carefully `its' response to oil `surrealist movements'. We argue that the surrealist movement is an essential part of a healthy ongoing dialectic for the field and needs to be recognized in exactly that context.
Ades, D.Surrealism as art. In M. Lloyd, Surrealism: Revolution by night. Canberra, Australia: National Gallery of Australia, 1993, pp. 3-74.
2.
Adorno, T.Against epistemology: A metacritique. Trans. W. Domingo. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1956/1984.
3.
Adorno, T.Aesthetic theory. Trans. R Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis, MN: Uni-versity of Minnesota, circa1969/1997.
4.
Alvesson, M.The play of metaphors. In J. Hassard and M. Parker (Eds), Postmodernism and organizations. London: Sage,1993a, pp. 114-131.
5.
Alvesson, M.Cultural perspectives on organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993b.
6.
Arrington, E. & Francis, J.Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privi-lege and accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1989, 14(1/2), 1-28.
7.
Benjamin, W.Surrealism: The last snapshot of the European intelligentsia. In One-way street. London: Verso, circa1929/1997, pp. 225-239.
8.
Bernstein, R.Praxis and action: Contemporary philosophies of human activity. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, 1971.
9.
Bourdieu, P.Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1984.
10.
Breton, A.Manifesto of surrealism (commonly referred to as the `First Manifesto of Surrealism'). In Manifestoes of surrealism. Trans. R. Seaver and H. Lane. Michigan: University of Michigan Ann Arbor, 1924/1969, pp. 1-47.
11.
Breton, A.Surrealism and painting (excerpt from Le Surrealisme et la peinture). In P. Waldberg, Surrealism. London: Thames and Hudson, 1927/1965, pp. 81-88.
12.
Breton, A.Second manifesto of surrealism. In Manifestoes of surrealism. Trans. R. Seaver and H. Lane. Michigan: University of Michigan Ann Arbor, 1930/1969, pp. 117-194.
13.
Breton, A.Speech to the congress of writers. In Manifestoes of surrealism. Trans. R. Seaver and H. Lane. Michigan: University of Michigan Ann Arbor, 1935/1969, pp. 234-241.
14.
Breton, A.The exquisite corpse (excerpt from Le cadavre exquis: Son exaltation). In P. Waldberg, Surrealism. London: Thames and Hudson, 1948/1965, pp. 93-95.
15.
Burrell, G.Pandemonium: Towards a retro-organization theory. London: Sage, 1997.
16.
Carr, A.Organisational psychology: Its origins, assumptions and implications for educational administration. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University, 1989.
17.
Carr, A.Organisation theory and postmodern thinking: The uncertain place of human agency . Policy, Organisation and Society, 1996a, 13, summer, 82-104.
18.
(Later published as Carr, A.Puta-tive problematic agency in a postmodern world. In H. Miller and C. Fox (Eds), Postmodernism, `reality,' and public administration: A discourse. Virginia: Chatelaine,1997, pp. 3-18.)
19.
Carr, A.Response to other papers in the special issue of ATP . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1996c, 18(1), 57-59.
Carr, A. . Burrell at play: Countering linearity by entering the land of the `dragons'. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 1997b, 19(3), 408-413.
22.
Carr, A.Identity, compliance and dissent in organisations: A psychoanalytic per-spective . Organization, 1998, 5(1), 81-99.
23.
Carr, A. & Leivesley, R.Metaphors in organisation studies: A retreat to obscu-rantism or ideology in `drag'?Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1995, 17(1), 55-66.
24.
Caws, M.The surrealist look: An erotics of encounter. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.
25.
Cooper, R.Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 3: The con-tribution of Jacques Derrida . Organization Studies, 1989, 10(4), 479-502.
26.
Cooper, R. & Burrell, G.Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analy-sis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 1988, 9(1), 91-112.
27.
Culler, J.On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, 1982.
28.
Denhardt, R.The pursuit of significance: Strategies for managerial success in public organizations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993.
29.
Derrida, J.Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University, 1976.
30.
Derrida, J.Writing and difference. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.
31.
Derrida, J.Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1981.
32.
Ernst, M.Beyond painting (excerpt from Au-dela de la peinture). In P. Waldberg, Surrealism. London: Thames and Hudson, 1936/1965, pp. 96-101.
33.
(Later published as Farmer, D.Public administration discourse as play with a purpose. Public Voices, 1997a, 3(1), 33-51.)
34.
Farmer, D. (Ed.). Special issue on postmodernism. Public Voices, 1997b, 3(1).
Grant, D. & Oswick, C. (Eds). Metaphor and organizations. London: Sage, 1996.
37.
Greer, T. A.history of the western world. 4th ed.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1982.
38.
Hassard, J.Postmodern organizational analysis: Towards a conceptual framework . Journal of Management Studies, 1994, 31(3), 303-324.
39.
Hocking, J. & Carr, A.Culture: The search for a better organisational metaphor. In C. Oswick and D. Grant (Eds), Organisation development: Metaphori-cal explorations. London: Pitman, 1996, pp. 73-89.
40.
Jameson, F.Marxism and form. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1971. Jay, M. Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1994.
41.
Kumar, K.From post-industrial to post-modern society. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
42.
Kvale, S.Postmodern psychology: A contradiction in terms? In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism. London: Sage, 1992, pp. 31-57.
43.
Lather, P.Postmodernism and the human sciences. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism. London: Sage, 1992, pp. 88-109.
44.
Levy, S.Desmond Morris 50 years of surrealism. London: Barrie & Jenkins, 1997.
45.
Linstead, S.Deconstruction in the study of organisations. In J. Hassard and M. Parker (Eds), Postmodernism and organisations. London: Sage, 1991/1993, pp. 49-70.
46.
Lloyd, M.Introduction. In M. Lloyd, Surrealism: Revolution by night. Canberra, Australia: National Gallery of Australia, 1993, pp. xi-xii.
47.
Lyotard, J.The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1984.
48.
McDonald, C.Western political theory: Nineteenth and twentieth centuries. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1968.
49.
Marcuse, H.Reason and revolution. Boston, MA: Beacon, 1941/1960.
50.
Marcuse, H.One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced indus-trial society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.
51.
Marcuse, H.Some remarks on Aragon: Art and politics in the totalitarian era . Theory, Culture & Society, circa unknown/1993, 10(2), 181-195.
52.
(Later pub-lished as Marshall, G.Deconstructing administrative behaviour: The `real' as representation. In H. Miller & C. Fox (Eds), Postmodernism, `reality,' and public administration: A discourse. Virginia: Chatelaine, 1997, pp. 87-104.)
53.
Martin, J.Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity, 1992.
54.
Matthews, J.Languages of Surrealism. Columbia, MO: The University of Mis-souri Press, 1986.
55.
Morgan, G.Paradigms, metaphors and puzzle solving in organization theory . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25(4), 605-622.
56.
Morgan, G.The schismatic metaphor and its implications for organizational analysis . Organization Studies, 1981, 2, 23-44.
57.
Morgan, G.More on metaphor: Why we cannot control tropes in administrative science . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28(4), 601-607.
58.
Morgan, G.Imaginization: The art of creative management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
59.
Morgan, G.Is there anything more to be said about metaphor? In D. Grant and C. Oswick (Eds), Metaphor and organizations. London: Sage, 1996, pp. 227-240.
60.
Morgan, G. & Ramirez, R.Action learning: A holographic metaphor for guiding social change. Human Relations, 1984, 37, 1-28.
Morris, D.The secret surrealist: The paintings of Desmond Morris. Oxford: Phaidon, 1987.
63.
Nadeau, M.The history of surrealism. Trans. R. Howard. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1964/1987.
64.
Nietzsche, F.The will to power. New York: Viking, 1888/1968.
65.
Oswick, C. & Grant, D. (Eds). Organisation development: Metaphorical explo-rations, London: Pitman, 1996.
66.
Rockmore, T.Before and after Hegel. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1993.
67.
Rosenau, P.Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intru-sions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1992.
68.
Rycroft, C.Symbolism and biological destiny. In C. Rycroft, The collected essays of Charles Rycroft: Viewpoints. London: Hogarth, 1984/1991, pp. 113-125.
Sabine, G. & Thorson, T.A history of political theory. 4th ed.Hinsdale, IL: Dryden, 1973.
71.
Sarup, M.An introduction guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. 2nd ed.Athens: University of Georgia, 1993.
72.
Sawin, M.Surrealism in exile and the beginning of the New York School. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995.
73.
Stepelevich, L.Editor's introduction. In G. Hegel, Preface and introduction to the phenomenology of mind. New York: Macmillan, 1990, pp. 1-29.
74.
Touraine, A.Return of the actor: A social theory in postindustrial society. Min-neapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1988.
75.
Waldberg, P.Surrealism. London: Thames and Hudson, 1965/1997.
76.
Zanetti, L.A.Book reviews: Postmodern public administration, by C. Fox and H. Miller and Postmodern management and organization theory, by D. Boje et al. (Eds). Public Productivity & Management Review,1996, 20(2), 204-209.
77.
Zanetti, L.A. & Carr, A.Putting critical theory to work: Giving the public administrator the critical edge. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1997, 19(2), 208-224.
