The role of the modern pilot requires a high degree of situational awareness. This involves the ability to search for relevant information, assess opportunities and priorities, and maintain performance under stress. The PC-based WOMBAT™ test has been designed to measure individual aptitude to cope with such demands. In the first experiment performance on the WOMBAT test was compared with performance on a battery of tests of specific underlying abilities. In the second experiment the performance of elite soaring pilots was compared with that of matched pilot and control groups. The results support the theory that the WOMBAT test measures individual ability to maintain situational awareness and that this ability is found in high levels in elite pilots.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM. J., TenneyY. J., & PewR. W. (1995). Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems.Human Factors, 37, 85–104.
2.
BartramD. (1987). The development of an automated testing system for pilot selection: The MICROPAT project.Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36, 279–298.
3.
BensonA. J., & GedyeJ. L. (1963). Logical processes in the resolution of orientation conflict (Report 259). Farnborough, England: Royal Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine.
4.
BescoR. (1994, January). Pilot personality testing and the emperor's new clothes.Ergonomics in Design, 24–29.
5.
CarettaT. R. (1989). USAF pilot selection and classification systems.Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 46–49.
6.
CarettaT. R., PerryD. C., & ReeM. J. (1996). Prediction of situational awareness in F-15 pilots.International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 21–41.
7.
DamosD. L. (1972). Cross-adaptive measurement of residual attention to predict pilot performance (Tech. Report ARL-72-25/AFOSR-72-12). Savoy: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.
8.
DamosD. L. (1993). Using meta-analysis to compare the predictive validity of single- and multiple-task measures to flight performance.Human Factors, 35, 615–628.
9.
DamosD. L. (1996). Pilot selection batteries: Shortcomings and perspectives.International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 199–209.
10.
DonchinE. (1989). The learning strategies project.Acta Psychologica, 71, 1–15.
11.
DuncanJ., WilliamsP., Nimmo-SmithI., & BrownI. (1993). The control of skilled behavior: Learning, intelligence, and distraction. In MeyerD. E., & KornblumS. (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 323–341). Cambridge: MIT Press.
12.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems.Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
13.
EndsleyM. R., & BolstadC. A. (1994). Individual differences in pilot situation awareness.International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 241–264.
14.
EricssonK. A., & LehmannA. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints.Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.
15.
FolkardS., KnauthP., MonkT. H., & RutenfranzJ. (1976). The effect of memory load on the circadian variation in performance efficiency under a rapidly rotating shift system.Ergonomics, 19, 479–488.
16.
GabaD. M., HowardS. K., & SmallS. D. (1995). Situation awareness in anesthesiology.Human Factors, 37, 20–31.
17.
GannE. K. (1961). Fate is the hunter.London: Hodder and Stoughton.
18.
GilsonR. D. (1995). Special issue preface.Human Factors, 37, 3–4.
19.
GobetF., & SimonH. A. (1996). The roles of recognition processes and look-ahead search in time-constrained expert problem solving.Psychological Science, 7, 52–55.
20.
GopherD. (1982). A selective attention test as a predictor of success in flight training.Human Factors, 24, 173–183.
21.
GopherD., & KahnemanD. (1971). Individual differences in attention and the prediction of flight criteria.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 1335–1342.
22.
GopherD., & NorthR. A. (1974). The measurement of operator capacity by manipulation of dual-task demands (Tech. Report ARL-74-21/AFOSR-74-15). Savoy: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.
23.
HatcherL., & StepanskiE. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
24.
HeimA. W., & BattsV. (1948). Upward and downward selection in intelligence testing.British Journal of Psychology, 39, 22–29.
25.
HopkinD. (1993, February). Situational awareness in air traffic control. Paper presented at the Situational Awareness in Complex Systems Conference, Orlando, FL, by the Center for Applied Human Factors in Aviation.
26.
LogieR., BaddeleyA., ManéA., DonchinE., & SheptakR. (1989). Working memory in the acquisition of complex cognitive skills.Acta Psychologica, 71, 53–87.
27.
ManéA., & DonchinE. (1989). The Space Fortress game.Acta Psychologica, 71, 17–22.
28.
New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations. (1990). Wellington: Department of Statistics, New Zealand.
29.
NorthR. A. (1977). Task components and demands as factors in dual-task performance (Tech. Report ARL-77-2/AFOSR-77-2). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.
30.
RabbittP. A., BanerjiN., & SzymanskiA. (1989). Space Fortress as an IQ test? Predictions of learning and practised performance in a complex interactive video game.Acta Psychologica, 71, 243–257.
31.
ReeM. J., & CarettaT. R. (1996). Central role of g in military pilot selection.International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 111–123.
32.
RoscoeS. N. (1974). Man as a precious resource: The enhancement of human effectiveness in air transport operations (Tech. Report ARL-74-6/AFOSR-74-4). Savoy: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.
33.
RoscoeS. N. (1993). An aid in the selection process—WOMBAT.Civil Aviation Training, 4(2), 48–51.
34.
RoscoeS. N. (1997). Predicting and enhancing flightdeck performance. In TelferR., & MooreP. (Eds.), Aviation training: Pilot, instructor, and organisation (pp. 195–208). Aldershot, England: Avebury.
35.
RoscoeS. N., & CorlL. (1987). Wondrous original method for basic airmanship testing. In JensenR. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 493–499). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.
36.
RoscoeS. N., & NorthR. A. (1980). Prediction of pilot performance. In RoscoeS. N. (Ed.), Aviation psychology (pp. 127–133). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
37.
SarterN. B., & WoodsD. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control.Human Factors, 37, 5–19.
38.
SAS Institute. (1985). SAS user's guide: Statistics (Version 5 ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
ThamM., & KramerA. (1994). Attentional control and piloting experience. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 31–35). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
41.
ThorneD. R., GenserS. G., SingH. C., & HeggeF. W. (1985). The Walter Reed Performance Assessment Battery.Neuro-behavioral Toxicology and Teratology, 7, 415–418.
