In this article we examine some of the basic psychophysics relevant to amplified night vision devices. These devices produce images that are substantially different from ordinary visual scenes. Distortions in contrast and luminance and the introduction of visual interference and geometrical artifacts contribute to unusual viewing conditions. We carried out experiments to determine the effect of these parameters of the image on a highly controlled visual target detection task simulated on a computer graphics system that closely models a night vision device. Our results indicate that display luminance and geometrical artifacts degrade detection performance only slightly, whereas contrast and visual interference have a substantial degrading effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, C. L., and Braddick, O. J. (1985). Temporal properties of the short-range visual process in apparent motion. Perception, 14, 181–192.
2.
Barlow, H. B. (1978). The efficiency of detecting ranges of density in random dot patterns. Vision Research, 18, 637–650.
3.
Berkley, W. E. (1992). Night vision goggle illusions and visual training.Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Armstrong Laboratory, Aircrew Training Research Division.
4.
Brown, B., and Monk, T. H. (1975). The effect of local target surround and whole background constraint on visual search times. Human Factors, 17, 81–85.
5.
Farrell, J. E., Pavel, M., and Sperling, G. (1990). The visible persistence of stimuli in stroboscopic motion. Vision Research, 30, 921–936.
6.
Groner, R., Groner, M. T., Muller, P., Bischof, W. F., and Di Lollo, V. (1993). On the confounding effects of phosphor persistence in oscilloscopic displays. Vision Research, 33, 913–918.
7.
Monk, T. H., and Brown, B. (1975). The effect of target surround density on visual search performance. Human Factors, 17, 356–360.
8.
Neisser, U. (1963). Decision time without reaction time: Experiments in visual scanning. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 376–385.
9.
Rotman, S. R. (1989). Modeling human search and target acquisition performance: II. Simulating multiple observers in dynamic scenarios. Optical Engineering, 28, 1223–1226.
10.
Rotman, S. R., Gordon, E. S., Kowalczyk, M. L. (1989). Modeling human search and target acquisition multitarget scenario. Optical Engineering, 28, 1216–1222.
11.
Schmieder, D. E., and Weathersby, M. R. (1983). Detection performance in clutter with variable resolution. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-19, 622–630.
12.
Spillman, L., and Kurtenbach, A. (1992). Dynamic interference backgrounds facilitate target fading. Vision Research, 32, 1941–1946.
13.
Triesman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194–214.
14.
Uttal, W. R. (1975). An autocorrelation theory of form detection.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Uttal, W. R. (1983). Visual form detection in 3 dimensional space.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Uttal, W. R. (1985). The detection of nonplanar surfaces in visual space.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Uttal, W. R. (1987). The perception of dotted forms.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
van Meeteren, A., and Barlow, H. B. (1981). The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation of average dot density in random figures. Vision Research, 21, 765–777.
19.
Van Trees, H. L. (1968). Detection, estimation, and modulation theory.New York: Wiley.
20.
Venetsanopoulos, A. N. (1987). Digital image processing and analysis. In J-L. Lacoume, T. S. Durram, and R. Stora (Eds.), Signal processing (Vol. II). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21.
Wolfe, J. M., Stewart, M. I., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Yu, K. P., Shorter, A. D., and Cave, K. R. (1990). Limitations on parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 879–892.
