We assessed the degree to which a virtual environment system produced a faithful simulation of three-dimensional space by investigating the influence of a pitched optic array on the perception of gravity-referenced eye level (GREL). We compared the results with those obtained in a physical environment. In a within-subjects factorial design, 12 subjects indicated GREL while viewing virtual threedimensional arrays at different static orientations. A physical array biased GREL more than did a geometrically identical virtual pitched array. However, addition of two sets of orthogonal parallel lines (a grid) to the virtual pitched array resulted in as large a bias as that obtained with the physical pitched array. The increased bias was caused by the longitudinal, but not the transverse, components of the grid. We discuss implications of our results for spatial orientation models and for designs of virtual displays.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Airey, J. M., Rohlf, J. H., and Brooks, F. P., Jr. (1990). Toward image realism with interactive update rates in complex virtual building environments. Computer Graphics, 24(2), 41–50.
2.
Ballinger, C. (1988). The effects of a pitched field orientation on hand/eye coordination. Unpublished master's thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
3.
Bridgeman, B. (1986). Multiple sources of outflow in processing spatial information. Acta Psychologica, 63, 35–48.
4.
Brooks, F. P., Jr. (1988). Grasping reality through illusion---Interactive graphics serving science. In Proceedings of the CHI 1988 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-–12). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
5.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments.Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Carollo, J. T. (Ed.). (1989). Helmet-mounted displays: Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 1116). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
7.
Chung, J. C., Harris, M. R., Brooks, F. P., Fuchs, H., Kelley, M. T., Hughes, J., Ouh-Young, M., Cheung, C., Holloway, R. L., and Pique, M. (1989). Exploring virtual worlds with head-mounted displays. In W. E. Robbins and S. S. Fisher (Eds.), Three-dimensional visualization and display technologies: Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 1083, pp. 42–52). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
8.
Clark, F. J., and Horch, K. W. (1986). Kinesthesia. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol. I: Sensory processes and perception (pp. 13-1–13-62). New York: Wiley.
9.
Cohen, M. M., and Ballinger, C. (1989). Hand-eye coordination is altered by viewing a target in a pitched visual frame. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 477.
10.
Day, R. H., and Wade, N. J. (1966). Visual spatial aftereffects from prolonged head tilt. Science, 154, 1201–1202.
11.
Edwards, A. L. (1985). Experimental design and psychological research (5th ed.). New York: Harper.
12.
Ellis, S. R. (Ed.). (1991a). Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments.London: Taylor & Francis.
13.
Ellis, S. R. (1991b). The nature and origin of virtual environments: A bibliographical essay. Computer Systems in Engineering, 2, 321–347.
14.
Ellis, S. R., Tyler, M., Kim, W. S., and Stark, L. (1992). Three-dimensional tracking with misalignment between display and control axes. SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 100-1, 985–989.
15.
Fisher, S. S., McGreevy, M., Humphries, J., and Robinett, W. (1986, October). Virtual environment display system. Paper presented at ACM 1986 Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics, Chapel Hill, NC.
16.
Fisher, S. S., Wenzel, E. M., Coler, C. and McGreevy, M. (1988). Virtual interface environment workstations. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 91-–95). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17.
Furness, T. A., and Kocian, D. F. (1986). Putting humans into virtual space. In Aerospace Simulation II, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference (pp. 214-–230). San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation.
18.
Games, P. A. (1978). A three-factor model encompassing many possible statistical tests on independent groups. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 168–182.
19.
Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Gilensky, A. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460–482.
22.
Gilensky, A. S. (1955). The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 173–192.
23.
Grunwald, A. J., and Ellis, S. R. (1988). Spatial orientation by familiarity cues. In J. Patrick and K. D. Duncan (Eds.), Training, human decision making and control (pp. 257–279). Elsevier: North-Holland.
24.
Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation.Chichester, England: Wiley.
25.
Howlett, E. M. (1990). Wide-angle orthostereo. In J. O. Merritt and S. S. Fisher (Eds.), Stereoscopic displays and applications: Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 1256, pp. 210–223). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
26.
Johnson, W. W., Tsang, P. S., Bennett, C. T., and Phatak, A. V. (1989). The visually guided control of simulated altitude. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 152–156.
27.
Kim, W. S., Ellis, S. R., Hannaford, B., Tyler, M., and Stark, L. (1987). A quantitative evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays in three axis manual tracking tasks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-17, 61–71.
28.
Levy, K. J. (1975). Comparing the variances of several treatments with a control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 793–796.
29.
Lewandowski, R. J. (Ed.), (1990). Helmet-mounted displays II: Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 1290). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
30.
Lichtenstein, J. H., and Saucer, R. T. (1974). Visual dependency in the erect and supine positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 529–531.
31.
Lintern, G., and Liu, Y.-T. (1991). Explicit and implicit horizons for simulated landing approaches. Human Factors, 33, 401–417.
32.
Lippert, T. M. (Ed.), (1992). Helmet-mounted displays IV: Proceedings of SPIE (vol. 1695). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
33.
Matin, L., and Fox, C. R. (1989). Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity. Vision Research, 29, 315–324.
34.
Matin, L., and Fox, C. R. (1990). Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity (Corrigenda). Vision Research, 30, 1.
35.
Matin, L., Fox, C. R., and Doktorsky, Y. (1987). How high is up?Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 28, (Suppl.), 300.
36.
Matin, L., and Li, W. (1989a). A single pitched line in darkness controls elevation of visually perceived eye level. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 30, (Suppl.), 506.
37.
Matin, L., and Li, W. (1989b). Linear summation of visual influences on perceived eye level. Journal of the Optical Society of America (Technical Digest Series), 18, 161.
38.
Matin, L., and Li, W. (1991). Separate mechanisms for perceived eye level and perceived vertical: Dissection by pitch and roll of a 2-line stimulus. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 32 (Suppl.), 900.
39.
Matin, L., and Li, W. (1992). Visually perceived eye level: Changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 257–289.
40.
McGreevy, M. W., and Ellis, S. R. (1986). The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments. Human Factors, 28, 439–456.
41.
Morl, M. E., Kavanaugh, R. D., McConville, M. (1971). Intratest and sex differences on a portable rod-and-frame test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 727–733.
42.
Nemire, K., and Cohen, M. M. (1993). Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 106–116.
43.
Palmer, E. A., and Petitt, J. C. (1976). Visual space perception on a computer graphics night visual attachment. In Proceedings of the AlAA Visual and Motion Simulation Conference (#A76-29488) (pp. 88–95). New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
44.
Perrone, J. A. (1982). Visual slant underestimation. Perception, 11, 641–654.
45.
Perrone, J. A., and Wenderoth, P. (1991). Visual slant underestimation. In S. Ellis (Ed.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments, London: Taylor & Francis.
46.
Sedgwick, H. A. (1980). The geometry of spatial layout in pictorial representation. In M. A. Hagen (Ed.)., The perception of pictures (vol. I). New York: Academic.
47.
Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol. I: Sensory processes and perception (pp. 21-1–21-57). New York: Wiley.
48.
Shebilske, W. L. (1977). Visuomotor coordination in visual direction and position constancies. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 23–69). New York: Wiley.
49.
Shebilske, W. L., and Fogelgren, L. A. (1977). Eye-position aftereffects of backward head tilt manifested by illusory visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 77–82.
50.
Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. (1980). Statistical methods (7th ed.). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
51.
Stoper, A. E., and Cohen, M. M. (1989). Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 469–475.
52.
Streibel, M. J., Barnes, R. D., Julness, G. D., and Ebenholtz, S. M. (1980). Determinants of the rod and frame effect: Role of organization and subjective contour. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 136–140.
53.
Tachi, S., Arai, H., and Maeda, T. (1989). Tele-existence visual display for remote manipulation with a realtime sensation of presence. In Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Industrial Robotics (pp. 427-–434). Tokyo: International Federation of Robotics.
54.
Tharp, G., and Ellis, S. R. (1990). The effects of training on errors of perceived direction in perspective displays (NASA Tech. Memorandum, 102792). Moffett Field, CA: NASA.
55.
von Holst, E., and Mittelstaedt, H. (1971). The principle of reafference: Interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. In P. C. Dodwell (Ed. and trans.), Perceptual processing: Stimulus equivalence and pattern recognition.New York: Appleton. (Reprinted from Die Naturwissenschaften, 1950).
56.
Warren, R., and Riccio, G. E. (1985). Visual cue dominance hierarchies: Implications for simulator design. Transactions of the SAE for 1985, 6, 937–951.
57.
Witkin, H., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., and Wapner, S. (1954). Personality through perception.New York: Harper.
58.
Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
Wolpert, L., Owen, D. H., and Warren, R. (1983). The isolation of optical information and its metrics for the detection of descent. In D. H. Owen (Ed.), Optical flow and texture variables useful in simulating self motion (II) (Tech. Report for Grant No. AFOSR-81-0078). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Aviation Psychology Laboratory.
