The effects of three types of flight simulator visual scene detail on detection of altitude change were evaluated in three experiments. Across all experiments and with a variety of tasks and display conditions, speed and accuracy of detecting altitude change improved with increases in the density of vertical objects in scenes. Adding detail to individual objects to increase their natural appearance produced no consistent effects on performance. In Experiment 3 complex texture distributed globally on terrain surfaces improved detection of altitude change but did not alleviate the need for high object density. These results indicate that available computer image generator processing capacity would be used more effectively by increasing the density of objects in scenes, rather than by increasing the complexity and detail of individual objects. Complex texture is used more effectively when distributed globally on terrain surfaces, rather than when allocated to individual objects.
Barfield, W., Rosenberg, C., and Kraft, C. (1989). The effects of visual cues to realism and perceived impact point during final approach. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 115–119). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3.
Buckland, G. H., Edwards, B. J., and Stephens, C. W. (1981). Flight simulator visual and instructional features for terrain flight simulation. In Proceedings of the Image Generation/Display Conference II (pp. 351–362). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Operations Training Division.
4.
Buckland, G. H., Monroe, E., and Mehrer, K. (1980). Flight simulator runway visual textural cues for landing (AFHRL-TR-79-81, AD A089434). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Operations Training Division.
5.
DeMaio, J., Rinalducci, E. J., Brooks, R., and Brunderman, J. (1983). Visual cueing effectiveness: Comparison of perception and flying performance. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Interservicellndustry Training Equipment Conference (pp. 92–96). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
6.
Eibeck, A. C., and Petrie, D. F. (1988). Advanced visual technology system computed image generation enhancements final report (Contract F33615-86-C-0011). Daytona Beach, FL: General Electric Company, Simulation and Control Systems Department.
7.
Engle, R. L. (1980). Use of low-altitude visual cues for flight simulation. Unpublished master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
8.
Fitzpatrick, V., Pasnak, R., and Tyer, Z. E. (1982). The effect of familiar size at familiar distances. Perception, 11, 85–91.
9.
Hettinger, L. J., and Owen, D. H. (1985). Increasing sensitivity to optical information specifying loss in altitude. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 483–490). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.
10.
Higashiyama, A. (1984). The effects of familiar size on judgments of size and distance: An interaction of viewing attitude with spatial cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 305–312.
11.
Kellogg, R. S., Prather, D. C., and Castore, C. H. (1981). Simulated A-10 combat environment (AFHRL-TR-81-48, AD-AltO 226). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Operations Training Division.
12.
Kleiss, J. A., and Hubbard, D. C. (1991). Effect of two types of scene detail on detection of change in altitude in a flight simulator (AL-TR-1991-0043). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Armstrong Laboratory, Aircrew Training Research Division.
13.
Kleiss, J. A., Hubbard, D. C., and Curry, D. G. (1989). Effect of three-dimensional object type and density in simulated low-level flight (AFHRL-TR-88-66, AD A209 756). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Operations Training Division.
14.
Lintem, G., Sheppard, D. J., Parker, D. L., Yates, K. E., and Nolan, M. D. (1989). Simulator design and instructional features for air-to-ground attack: A transfer study. Human Factors, 31, 87–99.
15.
Lintern, G., Thomley-Yates, K. E., Nelson, B. E., and Roscoe, S. N. (1987). Content, variety, and augmentation of simulated visual scenes for teaching air-to-ground attack. Human Factors, 29, 45–59.
16.
Martin, E. L., and Rinalducci, E. J. (1983). Low-level flight simulation vertical cues (AFHRL-TR-83-17, AD A133 612). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Operations Training Division.
17.
McCormick, D., Smith, T., Lewandowski, F., Preskar, W., and Martin, E. (1983). Low-altitude database development evaluation and research (LADDER). In Proceedings of the 5th InterservicelIndustry Training Equipment Conference (pp. ISO–ISS). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
18.
Owen, D. H., Warren, R., Jensen, R. S., and Mangold, S. J. (1981). Optical information for detecting toss in one's own altitude. In D. H. Owen and R. S. Jensen (Eds.), Methodological approaches to identifying relevant features for visual flight simulation (Final Tech. Report for AFOSR Contract F49620-79-C-0070, Task I). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Aviation Psychology Laboratory.
19.
Owen, D. H., Warren, R., Jensen, R. S., Mangold, S. J., Alexander, G. and Hettinger, L. J. (1981). Transformation realism: An interactive evaluation of optical information necessary for the visual simulation of flight. In Proceedings of the Image Generation/Display Conference II (pp. 385–400). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Operations Training Division.
20.
Owen, D. H., Warren, R., Jensen, R. S., Mangold, S. J., and Hettinger, L. J. (1981). Optical information for detecting loss in one's own forward speed. Acta Psychologica, 48, 203–213.
21.
Pierce, B. J. (1983). Low altitude simulator training: A-10 aircraft (AFHRL-TR-82-43). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Operations Training Division.
22.
Previc, F. H. (1989). Detection of optical flow patterns during low-altitude flight. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 708–714). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.
23.
Rock, I. (1975). An introduction to perception. New York: Macmillan.
24.
Searle, S. R. (1987). Linear models for unbalanced data. New York: Wiley.
25.
Stevens, K. A. (1982). Computational analysis: Implications for visual simulations of terrain. In W. Richards and K. Dismukes (Eds.), Vision research for flight simulation: A report on a workshop on simulation of lowlevel flight (pp. 38–64). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26.
Stevens, K. A. (1993). The detection of depth discontinuities from visual motion cues. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
Warren, R. (1982). Optical transformation during movement: Review of the optical concomitants of egomotion (AFOSR-TR-82-1028). Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation.
28.
Warren, R., and Riccio, G. E. (1985). Visual cue dominance hierarchies: Implications for simulator design. Transactions of the SAE, 6, 931–937.
29.
Wolpert, L. (1988). The active control of altitude over differing texture. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 15–19). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
