This study was designed to test predictions from a model of mental workload. The model predicts that mental workload grows as perceived distance from a task goal increases and the effective time for action decreases. Decreases in workload can be achieved by actions that bring the task goal into the region of acceptable time/distance constraints for successful resolution. We reported an experiment that tested these assertions using the Timepools performance task. Timepools generates a spatial representation of a shrinking temporal target to assess the effects of path length (i.e., the number of sequential targets to be acquired) and shrink rate (i.e., elapsed time during which the circle is halved in area) on reaction time (RT), movement time (MT), error rate, and the subjective perception of workload. Data from the experiment indicated systematic effects for task-related factors across performance and workload measures. Path length and shrink rate had differential effects on both RT and MT, which were also reflected in the components of the individual workload scales. The results support a general form of the workload model which may help researchers and practitioners in the difficult task of work load prediction
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Åstrand, P.O., and Rodahl, K. (1970). Textbook of work physiology.New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Becker, A. B., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., and Hancock, P. A. (1991). Effects of feedback on perceived workload in vigilance performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1491–1494). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3.
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. (1986). An engineering model of human performance. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 45.1–45.35). New York: Wiley.
4.
Chignell, M. H., and Hancock, P. A. (1985). Knowledge based load leveling and task allocation in human-machine systems. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Manual Control (9.1–9.11). Columbus, OH: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
5.
Damos, D. L. (1988). Individual differences in subjective estimates of workload. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 231–237). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6.
Derrick, W. L. (1988). Dimensions of operator workload. Human Factors, 30, 950–110.
7.
Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
8.
Freeman, G. L. (1948). The energetics of human behavior.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
Gopher, D., and Donchin, E. (1986). Workload: An examination of the concept. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 41.1–41.49). New York: Wiley.
10.
Hancock, P. A. (1987). Arousal theory, stress and performance: Problems of incorporating energetic aspects of behavior into human-machine systems function. In
11.
L. S. Mark, J. S. Warm, and R. L. Huston (Eds.), Ergonomics and human factors: Recent research (pp. 170–179). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Hancock, P. A. (1989). The effect of performance failure and task demand on the perception of mental workload. Applied Ergonomics, 20, 197–205.
13.
Hancock, P. A., and Chignell, M. H. (1987). Adaptive control in human-machine systems. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human factors psychology (pp. 305–345). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14.
Hancock, P. A., and Chignell, M. H. (1988). Mental workload dynamics in adaptive interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18, 647–658.
15.
Hancock, P. A., Chignell, M. H., and Kerr, G. (1988, August). Defining task complexity and task difficulty. Presented at the XXIV International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia.
16.
Hancock, P. A., Chignell, M. H., Vercruyssen, M., and Denhoff, M. (1989). Experimental evaluations of a model of mental workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 1233–1237). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17.
Hancock, P. A., and Meshkati, N. (Eds.). (1988). Human mental workload.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
18.
Hancock, P. A., Meshkati, N., and Robertson, M. M. (1985). Physiological reflections of mental workload. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 56, 1110–1114.
19.
Hancock, P. A., and Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.
20.
Hancock, P. A., Warm, J. S. and Dember, W. M. (1991). The workload of sustained attention. (Tech. Report HFRL 91–02). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Human Factors Research Laboratory.
21.
Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
23.
Jex, H. R. (1988). Measuring mental workload: Problems, progress, and promises. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 5–39). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24.
Johnson, W. W., and Hart, S. G. (1987). Step tracking shrinking targets. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 248–252). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
25.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
Kantowitz, B. H. (1987). Mental workload. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human factors psychology (pp. 81–121). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27.
Kantowitz, B. H., and Sorkin, R. D. (1983). Human factors: Understanding people-system relationships.New York: Wiley.
28.
Moray, N. (Ed.). (1979). Mental workload: Its theory and measurement.New York: Plenum.
29.
O'Donnell, R. D., and Eggemeier, F. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 42.1–42.49). New York: Wiley.
30.
Poulton, E. C. (1982). Influential companions: Effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 673–690.
31.
Reid, G. B., and Nygren, T. E. (1988). The subjective workload assessment technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 185–218). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
32.
Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
33.
Shiffrin, R. M., and Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
34.
Vidulich, M. A. (1988). The cognitive psychology of subjective mental workload. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 219–229). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
35.
Westrum, R. (1991). Technologies and society: The shaping of people and things.Bellmont. CA: Wadsworth.
36.
Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson and R. Pew (Eds.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-104). Orlando, FL: Academic.
38.
Wickens, C. D. (1987). Attention. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human factors in psychology (pp. 29–80). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
39.
Wickens, C. D. (1988). Codes and modalities in multiple resources: A success and a qualification. Human Factors, 30, 599–616.
40.
Wilson, J. R., and Corlett, E. N. (1990). Evaluation of human work.London: Taylor & Francis.
41.
Yeh, Y. Y., and Wickens, C. D. (1988). Dissociation of performance and subjective measures of workload. Human Factors, 30, 111–120.
