This study investigated several factors that affect depth perception in stereoscopic displays: half-image separation magnitude, separation direction (crossed vs. uncrossed), viewing distance, stimulus size, and exposure duration. The depth perceived under various combinations of levels of these factors was compared with depth predicted by the geometry of stereopsis. Perceived depth in the crossed-separation direction was frequently close to predictions, such that increases in separation and viewing distance produced appropriate increases in perceived depth. Depth in the uncrossed direction was frequently less than that predicted, especially for small stimuli presented at a long viewing distance, with a large half-image separation, and/or with a brief duration. Thus depth in both crossed and uncrossed directions equaled predictions only for large stimuli exposed for a long duration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CormackR. H. (1982). Depth constancy in stereoscopic afterimages: Effects of viewing distance and measurement method (Tech. Report N14–0001 82C-0003). Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, Engineering Psychology Programs.
2.
CormackR. H., and FoxR. (1985). The computation of disparity and depth in stereograms. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 375–380.
3.
ErkelensC. J. (1988). Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram. Vision Research, 28, 345–353.
4.
FahleM. (1991). Psychophysical measurement of eye drifts and tremor by dichoptic or monocular vernier acuity. Vision Research, 31, 209–222.
5.
FoxR. (1985). Interaction of image characteristics of stereoscopic forms during depth perception (Tech. Report N14-0001-85C-0001). Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research, Engineering Psychology Programs.
6.
FoxR., and PattersonR. (1981). Depth separation and lateral interference. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 513–520.
7.
FurnessT. A. (1986). The super cockpit and its human challenges. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 48–52). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
8.
HeldR., BirchE. E., and GwiazdaJ. (1980). Stereoacuity of human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 77, 5572–5574.
9.
HochbergJ. (1972). Perception: II. Space and movement. In KlingJ.W., and RiggsL.A. (Eds.), Woodworth & Schlosberg's experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 475–550). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.
JuleszB. (1960). Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns. Bell System Technical Journal, 301125–1162.
11.
JuleszB. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
LeVayS., and VoigtT. (1988). Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 1, 395.
13.
MaunsellJ. H. R., and Van EssenD. C. (1983). Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey: II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 1148.
OnoH., and ComerfordT. (1977). Stereoscopic depth constancy. In EpsteinW. (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 91–128). New York: Wiley.
16.
ParrishR. V., and WilliamsS. P. (1990). Determination of depth-viewing volumes for stereo three-dimensional graphic display (Tech. Report AVSCOM 90-B-016). Hampton, VA: Langley Research Center.
17.
PattersonR., CaykoR., FlanaganR., and TaylorE. (1989). Sensitivity differences between crossed and uncrossed stereoscopic mechanisms. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 30 (Suppl.), 253.
18.
PattersonR., CaykoR., ShortG. L., FlanaganR., MoeL., and TaylorE. (1993). Temporal sensitivity differences between crossed and uncrossed stereoscopic mechanisms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19.
PattersonR., and FoxR. (1984). The effect of testing method on stereoanomaly. Vision Research, 24, 403–408.
20.
PattersonR., and FoxR. (1990). Metacontrast making between cyclopean and luminance stimuli. Vision Research, 30, 439–448.
21.
PattersonR., and MartinW. L. (1992). Human stereopsis. Human Factors, 34, 669–692.
22.
PattersonR., ShortG. L., and MoeL. (1989). Stereoscopic depth sensitivity differences between the crossed and uncrossed disparity directions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 1427–1429). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
23.
PoggioG. F., and FischerB. (1977). Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity of striate and prestriate cortical neurons of the behaving rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 40, 1392.
24.
PoggioG. F., MotterB. C., SquatritoS., and TrotterY. (1985). Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vision Research, 25, 397.
25.
PoggioG. F., and PoggioT. (1984). The analysis of stereopsis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 7, 379–412.
26.
RichardsW. (1970). Stereopsis and stereoblindness. Experimental Brain Research, 10, 380.
27.
RitterM. (1979). Perception of depth: Processing of simple positional disparity as a function of viewing distance. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 209–214.
28.
SchorC. M., and HowarthP. A. (1986). Suprathreshold stereo-depth matches as a function of contrast and spatial frequency. Perception, 15, 249–258.
29.
ShettyS. S., BrodersenA. J., and FoxR. (1979). System for generating dynamic random-element stereograms. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 11, 485–494.
30.
WallachH., and ZuckermanC. (1963). The constancy of stereoscopic depth. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 404–412.
31.
WestheimerG. (1954). Eye movement responses to a horizontally moving visual stimulus. American Medical Association Archives of Ophthalmology, 52, 932–941.
32.
WestheimerG. (1979). The spatial sense of the eye. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 18, 893–912.
33.
WestheimerG. (1986). Spatial interaction in the domain of disparity signals in human stereoscopic vision. Journal of Physiology (Lond.), 370, 619–629.
34.
WickensC. D., ToddS., and SeidlerK. (1989). Three-dimensional displays: Perception, implementation, applications (Tech. Report CSERIAC SOAR-89–01). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
35.
YehY. Y., and SilversteinL. D. (1990). Limits of fusion and depth judgment in stereoscopic color displays. Human Factors, 32, 45–60.
